Reconciling Children’s Best Interests and Right to be Heard

Hege Stein Helland
{"title":"Reconciling Children’s Best Interests and Right to be Heard","authors":"Hege Stein Helland","doi":"10.1163/15718182-32010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article explores the tension between the child’s best interests principle and children’s participation and examines the inherent challenges and different approaches to reconcile the dilemma in law and practice: how can children’s best interests be reconciled with their right to be heard? By exploring different systems’ institutional approaches and empirical ability to implement and honour children’s right to participation in national contexts, this article reviews the literature and suggests a framework for understanding participation through a lens of a global typology of child protection systems. Drawing on the conceptual and empirical reviews and elements from the deliberative ideal for decision-making, the article concludes by drawing up a sketch for a best interest model for meaningful, respectful and successful participation with global applicability. The model aims to enhance children’s citizenship and legitimacy of decision-making in child protection.","PeriodicalId":217193,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-32010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the tension between the child’s best interests principle and children’s participation and examines the inherent challenges and different approaches to reconcile the dilemma in law and practice: how can children’s best interests be reconciled with their right to be heard? By exploring different systems’ institutional approaches and empirical ability to implement and honour children’s right to participation in national contexts, this article reviews the literature and suggests a framework for understanding participation through a lens of a global typology of child protection systems. Drawing on the conceptual and empirical reviews and elements from the deliberative ideal for decision-making, the article concludes by drawing up a sketch for a best interest model for meaningful, respectful and successful participation with global applicability. The model aims to enhance children’s citizenship and legitimacy of decision-making in child protection.
兼顾儿童的最大利益和倾诉权
本文探讨了儿童最大利益原则与儿童参与之间的紧张关系,并研究了在法律和实践中调和这一困境的内在挑战和不同方法:如何调和儿童的最大利益与儿童发表意见的权利?通过探讨不同体系的制度方法以及在国家背景下落实和尊重儿童参与权的实证能力,本文回顾了相关文献,并提出了一个通过全球儿童保护体系类型学的视角来理解参与权的框架。文章借鉴了概念和实证评论以及决策审议理想的要素,最后勾勒出一个具有全球适用性的有意义、受尊重和成功参与的最佳利益模式。该模式旨在增强儿童的公民意识和儿童保护决策的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信