Legal Protection of Consumers on the Sale of Vitamin D3 Without a Distribution Permit BPOM in the Digital Marketplace

Edi Wahjuni, Nuzulia Kumala Sari, Rizki Kurniawan Putra
{"title":"Legal Protection of Consumers on the Sale of Vitamin D3 Without a Distribution Permit BPOM in the Digital Marketplace","authors":"Edi Wahjuni, Nuzulia Kumala Sari, Rizki Kurniawan Putra","doi":"10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital trade has resulted in many health products being sold online through marketplaces. According to the facts that have occurred, several vitamin D3 that do not have distribution permits or imitations are sold in the digital marketplace. Vitamin D3 without a distribution license or imitation certainly causes harm to consumers. This is because the products received do not contain the proper composition of vitamins and can endanger human health. The purpose of writing is to forms of legal protection for consumers who are harmed and settlement of consumer disputes that are harmed due to vitamin D3 without a distribution permit in the digital marketplace. The approaches used are statutory approach and conceptual approach. Internal legal protection is obtained from agreements in the marketplace. External protection for consumers who are harmed by vitamin D3 without a distribution permit can use Article 143 of Law No.17 of 2023 concerning Health and Article 4, Article 8, Article 19 of the of the Consumer Protection Law and Article 1365 of the Civil Code that business actors must be responsible and fulfill consumer rights in getting returns as before. However, consumer legal protection for the sale of vitamin D3 in the digital marketplace is not optimal because it is influenced by factors of legal substance, legal structure and legal culture. Dispute resolution can be filed by consumers in non-litigation through BPSK and litigation through the court.","PeriodicalId":14024,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","volume":"5 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital trade has resulted in many health products being sold online through marketplaces. According to the facts that have occurred, several vitamin D3 that do not have distribution permits or imitations are sold in the digital marketplace. Vitamin D3 without a distribution license or imitation certainly causes harm to consumers. This is because the products received do not contain the proper composition of vitamins and can endanger human health. The purpose of writing is to forms of legal protection for consumers who are harmed and settlement of consumer disputes that are harmed due to vitamin D3 without a distribution permit in the digital marketplace. The approaches used are statutory approach and conceptual approach. Internal legal protection is obtained from agreements in the marketplace. External protection for consumers who are harmed by vitamin D3 without a distribution permit can use Article 143 of Law No.17 of 2023 concerning Health and Article 4, Article 8, Article 19 of the of the Consumer Protection Law and Article 1365 of the Civil Code that business actors must be responsible and fulfill consumer rights in getting returns as before. However, consumer legal protection for the sale of vitamin D3 in the digital marketplace is not optimal because it is influenced by factors of legal substance, legal structure and legal culture. Dispute resolution can be filed by consumers in non-litigation through BPSK and litigation through the court.
在数字市场销售无分销许可 BPOM 的维生素 D3 时对消费者的法律保护
数字贸易导致许多保健产品通过市场在网上销售。根据已经发生的事实,一些没有销售许可证或仿冒品的维生素 D3 在数字市场上销售。没有经销许可证或仿冒品的维生素 D3 当然会对消费者造成伤害。这是因为收到的产品不含有适当的维生素成分,会危害人体健康。撰写本文的目的在于为受到伤害的消费者提供法律保护,并解决因维生素 D3 在数字市场上无经销许可证而受到伤害的消费纠纷。采用的方法有法定方法和概念方法。内部法律保护来自市场协议。对于因维生素 D3 无销售许可证而受到损害的消费者的外部保护,可以利用 2023 年第 17 号法律《卫生法》第 143 条、《消费者保护法》第 4 条、第 8 条、第 19 条和《民法典》第 1365 条,即企业行为人必须负责任,并履行消费者权利,像以前一样获得退货。然而,由于受到法律实质、法律结构和法律文化等因素的影响,在数字市场上销售维生素 D3 的消费者法律保护并不理想。消费者可以通过 BPSK 提起非诉讼和通过法院提起诉讼来解决争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信