Comparing Drug Handling Efficiencies and Expenses for Short- Acting Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Injection Originators and Biosimilars from the Perspective of Hospital Resource Management in Formulary Decision-Making

Shao- Chin Chiang
{"title":"Comparing Drug Handling Efficiencies and Expenses for Short- Acting Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Injection Originators and Biosimilars from the Perspective of Hospital Resource Management in Formulary Decision-Making","authors":"Shao- Chin Chiang","doi":"10.31579/2639-4162/146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: With the availability of biosimilars, hospital formulary drug selection among biologics extends beyond clinical and safety considerations when comes to hospital resource management, to factors like human resource allocation and financial sustainability. However, research assessing the time and cost of labor, supplies, and waste disposal of biologics from the standpoint of hospitals remains limited. This study focuses on short-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor originators (Granocyte® and Neupogen®) and biosimilar (Nivestim®), comparing them based on mean total handling times per dose and total annual expenses. Materials and Methods: Ten nursesfrom a Taiwanese cancer centerwere recruited; they each prepared three doses of each drug. Results: Findings showedthat the mean total handlingtimes per dose of Granocyte® and Neupogen® were significantly higherthan that of Nivestim®. Handling Nivestim® required the lowest total annual expense. Conclusion: Nivestim® is an advantageous alternative to Granocyte® and Neupogen®, benefiting hospital resource management.","PeriodicalId":93288,"journal":{"name":"General medicine and clinical practice","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General medicine and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: With the availability of biosimilars, hospital formulary drug selection among biologics extends beyond clinical and safety considerations when comes to hospital resource management, to factors like human resource allocation and financial sustainability. However, research assessing the time and cost of labor, supplies, and waste disposal of biologics from the standpoint of hospitals remains limited. This study focuses on short-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor originators (Granocyte® and Neupogen®) and biosimilar (Nivestim®), comparing them based on mean total handling times per dose and total annual expenses. Materials and Methods: Ten nursesfrom a Taiwanese cancer centerwere recruited; they each prepared three doses of each drug. Results: Findings showedthat the mean total handlingtimes per dose of Granocyte® and Neupogen® were significantly higherthan that of Nivestim®. Handling Nivestim® required the lowest total annual expense. Conclusion: Nivestim® is an advantageous alternative to Granocyte® and Neupogen®, benefiting hospital resource management.
从处方决策中医院资源管理的角度比较短效粒细胞集落刺激因子注射液原研药和生物仿制药的药物处理效率和费用
背景/目的:随着生物仿制药的出现,医院在处方药中选择生物制剂时,除了要考虑临床和安全因素外,还要考虑医院资源管理、人力资源分配和财务可持续性等因素。然而,从医院角度评估生物制剂的人力、供应和废物处理所需的时间和成本的研究仍然有限。本研究重点关注短效粒细胞集落刺激因子原研药(Granocyte® 和 Neupogen®)和生物仿制药(Nivestim®),根据每剂平均总处理时间和年度总支出对它们进行比较。材料与方法:招募台湾一家癌症中心的 10 名护士,每人准备三剂药物。结果结果显示,Granocyte® 和 Neupogen® 每剂平均总处理时间明显高于 Nivestim®。处理 Nivestim® 所需的年度总费用最低。结论:NivestimNivestim® 是 Granocyte® 和 Neupogen® 的有利替代品,有利于医院的资源管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信