Acordo de Não Persecução Penal (ANPP): aspectos gerais e observações sobre a confissão extrajudicial

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Rogerio Schietti Cruz, Eduardo Martins Neiva Monteiro
{"title":"Acordo de Não Persecução Penal (ANPP): aspectos gerais e observações sobre a confissão extrajudicial","authors":"Rogerio Schietti Cruz, Eduardo Martins Neiva Monteiro","doi":"10.22197/tf0g7z22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement in the criminal procedural law by L. 13.964, of 2019, the criminal consensual justice system now has yet another important institute. Although initially provided for in CNMP Resolution n. 181, of 2017, its legal provision permanently removed the criticisms directed at its implementation through an infralegal act. In addition to exploring the legal nature of the ANPP, the possibility of its application in various crimes, its relationship with the constitutional right to silence, as well as the need for the Investigated to know the evidence produced against him to better evaluate the proposed agreement, the study analyzes the extrajudicial confession as an essential requirement for its celebration and approval by the Judiciary, including the exposition of the understandings of the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice that are formed on the subject. In the end, in view of the researched precedents, we seek to answer the following questions: do the STF and the STJ require certain requirements to validate the extrajudicial confession? Do you understand that judicial appreciation is relevant?","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22197/tf0g7z22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the introduction of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement in the criminal procedural law by L. 13.964, of 2019, the criminal consensual justice system now has yet another important institute. Although initially provided for in CNMP Resolution n. 181, of 2017, its legal provision permanently removed the criticisms directed at its implementation through an infralegal act. In addition to exploring the legal nature of the ANPP, the possibility of its application in various crimes, its relationship with the constitutional right to silence, as well as the need for the Investigated to know the evidence produced against him to better evaluate the proposed agreement, the study analyzes the extrajudicial confession as an essential requirement for its celebration and approval by the Judiciary, including the exposition of the understandings of the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice that are formed on the subject. In the end, in view of the researched precedents, we seek to answer the following questions: do the STF and the STJ require certain requirements to validate the extrajudicial confession? Do you understand that judicial appreciation is relevant?
非起诉协议(NPA):一般方面和关于庭外供述的意见
随着 2019 年第 13.964 号法律在刑事诉讼法中引入《刑事不起诉协议》,刑事合意司法系统现在又多了一个重要机构。虽然最初是在2017年的第181号CNMP决议中规定的,但其法律规定永久性地消除了针对其通过非法行为实施的批评。除了探讨ANPP的法律性质、其在各种犯罪中适用的可能性、其与宪法规定的沉默权的关系,以及被调查人了解对其不利的证据以更好地评估拟议协议的必要性之外,本研究还分析了法外供词作为其获得司法机构庆祝和批准的基本要求,包括阐述联邦最高法院和高级法院在这一问题上形成的理解。最后,根据所研究的先例,我们试图回答以下问题:STF 和 STJ 是否要求某些条件才能使法外供词生效?您是否理解司法鉴定的相关性?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
66.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信