Assessing the performance of five adult mosquito sampling methods for malaria vector surveillance in various ecosystems in Cameroon

P. Nwane, Michael Piameu, Yannick Niamsi Emalio, W. Ekoko, S. Mandeng, L. R. Mbakop, Salomon Patchoké, J. Toto, L. D. Alenou, Elisabeth Ngo Bikoi, Hugues Onguina, Narcisse Nvondo, R. Mimpfoundi, R. Tabue, J. Bigoga, E. Fondjo, P. Awono-ambene, J. Etang
{"title":"Assessing the performance of five adult mosquito sampling methods for malaria vector surveillance in various ecosystems in Cameroon","authors":"P. Nwane, Michael Piameu, Yannick Niamsi Emalio, W. Ekoko, S. Mandeng, L. R. Mbakop, Salomon Patchoké, J. Toto, L. D. Alenou, Elisabeth Ngo Bikoi, Hugues Onguina, Narcisse Nvondo, R. Mimpfoundi, R. Tabue, J. Bigoga, E. Fondjo, P. Awono-ambene, J. Etang","doi":"10.3389/fitd.2024.1235146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many sampling methods are used for entomological surveillance of vector borne diseases. This paper, evaluated the performance of five methods with regard to various ecosystems encountered in Cameroon. Two entomological databases generated during two study periods were examined: 2011-2014 in the North Region, and 2018-2019 in the Centre Region. Mosquitoes were collected using the (Human Landing Catches) (HLC) and four alternative methods including Clay Pots (CPs), Pyrethroid Spray Catches (PSCs), Window Exit Traps (WETs) and Centers for Disease Control-Light Traps (CDC-LTs) for which the performance was assessed in this study.A total of 29 anopheline species were identified from samples collected during the two study periods. All these anopheline species were found in North Region, with 5 species being the most abundant and prévalent, i.e. An. gambiae s.l, An. funestus, An. rufipes, An. paludis and An. pharoensis. In the Centre Region, only five species including An. gambiae s.l, An. funestus, An. coustani, An. ziemanni and An. paludis were recorded. Among these, An. gambiae s.l was the most abundant and prevalent species. Data confirmed HLC as the best in sampling outdoor and indoor mosquitoes in the surveyed HDs. The alternative methods showed variable records regarding the species richness. Based on the number of mosquitoes collected, CP was an alternative to HLC for outdoor collections in Garoua and Pitoa HDs, while WET was an alternative in Mayo Oulo HD. In the Centre Region, CDC-LT was an alternative to HLC for indoor collections in Ekié and Nkolbisson HDs, while PSC proved to be the best alternative in Nkolondom HD. Regarding the species richness WET appeared as an alternative to HLC in sampling outdoor mosquitoes in Garoua and Mayo Oulo HDs, while CP was the best alternative in Pitoa HD. In the Centre Region, CDC-LT was an alternative for outdoor and indoor collections in Nkolbisson HD, and the best alternative for outdoor collections in Ekie HD. The current study revealed variable performance of the five tested adult mosquito collection methods across the prospected HDs in North and Centre Regions of Cameroon. Further investigations will be conducted on other collection methods, e.g., aspiration, mosquito electrocuting grid trap, ovitraps and human-baited double net trap.","PeriodicalId":73112,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in tropical diseases","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in tropical diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2024.1235146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many sampling methods are used for entomological surveillance of vector borne diseases. This paper, evaluated the performance of five methods with regard to various ecosystems encountered in Cameroon. Two entomological databases generated during two study periods were examined: 2011-2014 in the North Region, and 2018-2019 in the Centre Region. Mosquitoes were collected using the (Human Landing Catches) (HLC) and four alternative methods including Clay Pots (CPs), Pyrethroid Spray Catches (PSCs), Window Exit Traps (WETs) and Centers for Disease Control-Light Traps (CDC-LTs) for which the performance was assessed in this study.A total of 29 anopheline species were identified from samples collected during the two study periods. All these anopheline species were found in North Region, with 5 species being the most abundant and prévalent, i.e. An. gambiae s.l, An. funestus, An. rufipes, An. paludis and An. pharoensis. In the Centre Region, only five species including An. gambiae s.l, An. funestus, An. coustani, An. ziemanni and An. paludis were recorded. Among these, An. gambiae s.l was the most abundant and prevalent species. Data confirmed HLC as the best in sampling outdoor and indoor mosquitoes in the surveyed HDs. The alternative methods showed variable records regarding the species richness. Based on the number of mosquitoes collected, CP was an alternative to HLC for outdoor collections in Garoua and Pitoa HDs, while WET was an alternative in Mayo Oulo HD. In the Centre Region, CDC-LT was an alternative to HLC for indoor collections in Ekié and Nkolbisson HDs, while PSC proved to be the best alternative in Nkolondom HD. Regarding the species richness WET appeared as an alternative to HLC in sampling outdoor mosquitoes in Garoua and Mayo Oulo HDs, while CP was the best alternative in Pitoa HD. In the Centre Region, CDC-LT was an alternative for outdoor and indoor collections in Nkolbisson HD, and the best alternative for outdoor collections in Ekie HD. The current study revealed variable performance of the five tested adult mosquito collection methods across the prospected HDs in North and Centre Regions of Cameroon. Further investigations will be conducted on other collection methods, e.g., aspiration, mosquito electrocuting grid trap, ovitraps and human-baited double net trap.
评估喀麦隆不同生态系统中用于疟疾病媒监测的五种成蚊采样方法的性能
病媒传播疾病的昆虫学监测使用了许多取样方法。本文评估了五种方法在喀麦隆各种生态系统中的表现。本文研究了在两个研究期间生成的两个昆虫学数据库:2011-2014 年在北部大区,2018-2019 年在中部大区。本研究使用人类着陆捕捉器(HLC)和四种替代方法收集蚊子,包括粘土罐(CPs)、拟除虫菊酯喷雾捕捉器(PSCs)、窗口出口诱捕器(WETs)和疾病控制中心-灯光诱捕器(CDC-LTs),并对这些方法的性能进行了评估。所有这些疟原虫种类都出现在北部地区,其中 5 种疟原虫种类最多且最普遍,即冈比亚疟原虫(An. gambiae s.l)、疟原虫(An. funestus)、疟原虫(An. rufipes)、疟原虫(An. paludis)和疟原虫(An. pharoensis)。在中部地区,只记录到五个物种,包括 An. gambiae s.l、An. funestus、An. coustani、An. ziemanni 和 An. paludis。其中,An. gambiae s.l.是数量最多和最普遍的物种。数据证实,在调查的房屋署中,以高频荧光法采集室外和室内蚊子样本效果最佳。其他方法在物种丰富度方面的记录各不相同。根据采集到的蚊子数量,在加鲁阿和皮托阿人类发展区,CP 是室外采集 HLC 的替代方法,而在马约乌洛人类发展区,WET 是替代方法。在中部地区,在 Ekié 和 Nkolbisson HDs 的室内采集中,CDC-LT 是 HLC 的替代品,而在 Nkolondom HDs,PSC 被证明是最佳替代品。在物种丰富度方面,在加鲁阿和 Mayo Oulo 人类发展区,WET 可替代 HLC 进行室外蚊子采样,而在 Pitoa 人类发展区,CP 是最佳选择。在中部地区,CDC-LT 是 Nkolbisson HD 室外和室内采集的替代方法,是 Ekie HD 室外采集的最佳替代方法。目前的研究表明,在喀麦隆北部和中部地区的疑似人类发展区,五种经过测试的成蚊收集方法性能各异。还将对其他收集方法进行进一步调查,如抽吸法、蚊子电击网格诱捕器、椭圆形诱捕器和人诱双网诱捕器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信