Forum: Authority, Sovereignty, Interpretation … Subtext? Controversies in Recent German Historiography

IF 0.4 3区 人文科学 Q1 HISTORY
B. Hett, Jennifer V. Evans, Anna Hájková, Hedwig Richter, Nathan Stoltzfus
{"title":"Forum: Authority, Sovereignty, Interpretation … Subtext? Controversies in Recent German Historiography","authors":"B. Hett, Jennifer V. Evans, Anna Hájková, Hedwig Richter, Nathan Stoltzfus","doi":"10.1017/s0008938923000857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like other historiographical fields, that of German history has been defined through most of its existence by the things historians argued about. We could go back well over a hundred years to the Methodenstreit over Karl Lamprecht's efforts to write multidisciplinary history, follow the line through the work of Eckart Kehr, Fritz Fischer, Hans Ulrich Wehler, and the Sonderweg debate, and continue on through the Historikerstreit and the Historikerinnenstreit of the 1980s, and the Goldhagen and Wehrmacht exhibit fights in the mid-1990s, to recent debates over the relative weight of colonial and Holocaust memory.","PeriodicalId":45053,"journal":{"name":"Central European History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938923000857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"人文科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like other historiographical fields, that of German history has been defined through most of its existence by the things historians argued about. We could go back well over a hundred years to the Methodenstreit over Karl Lamprecht's efforts to write multidisciplinary history, follow the line through the work of Eckart Kehr, Fritz Fischer, Hans Ulrich Wehler, and the Sonderweg debate, and continue on through the Historikerstreit and the Historikerinnenstreit of the 1980s, and the Goldhagen and Wehrmacht exhibit fights in the mid-1990s, to recent debates over the relative weight of colonial and Holocaust memory.
论坛:权威、主权、解释......潜台词?近期德国史学界的争议
与其他史学领域一样,德国史在其存在的大部分时间里都是由史学家们争论的事物所定义的。我们可以追溯到一百多年前关于卡尔-兰普雷希特(Karl Lamprecht)撰写多学科历史的 "方法论争论"(Methodenstreit),沿着埃卡特-克尔(Eckart Kehr)、弗里茨-菲舍尔(Fritz Fischer)、汉斯-乌尔里希-韦勒(Hans Ulrich Wehler)的著作和 "桑德韦格"(Sonderweg)争论的脉络,继续追溯到 20 世纪 80 年代的 "历史学家争论"(Historikerstreit)和 "历史学家之争"(Historikerinnenstreit),以及 20 世纪 90 年代中期的 "戈尔哈根"(Goldhagen)和 "国防军"(Wehrmacht)展览之争,直到最近关于殖民记忆和大屠杀记忆的相对重要性的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Central European History offers articles, review essays, and book reviews that range widely through the history of Germany, Austria, and other German-speaking regions of Central Europe from the medieval era to the present. All topics and approaches to history are welcome, whether cultural, social, political, diplomatic, intellectual, economic, and military history, as well as historiography and methodology. Contributions that treat new fields, such as post-1945 and post-1989 history, maturing fields such as gender history, and less-represented fields such as medieval history and the history of the Habsburg lands are especially desired. The journal thus aims to be the primary venue for scholarly exchange and debate among scholars of the history of Central Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信