MEASURING SUSTAINABILITY IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES

Ieva Cataldo
{"title":"MEASURING SUSTAINABILITY IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES","authors":"Ieva Cataldo","doi":"10.3846/mla.2024.19088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an analysis of the most important sustainability indicators for SSCM in construction and gives a detailed overview of what has been scientifically accomplished in the field to date, and identifies areas for further research. The most important sustainability indicators were also grouped and presented in the literature review into the main seven assessment groups of the SSCM construction industry and ranked by experts from Northern Italy and Lithuania in several different ways. Based on the data from the Table 3, it can be inferred that a harmonious work environment among ecological sustainability indicators appeared as the most crucial indicator for respondents. Environmental education was among the most important social indicators. In the legal group, work efficiency emerged as the most significant indicator, while in the physical group, sustainable resource use was crucial. In the political realm, economic and political stability was the most important, and among technological indicators, innovation stood out. Among economic indicators, profit was the most significant sustainability indicator for respondents. A general indicator importance method combined results obtained from expert surveys using various methods. The ranking of sustainability indicators in each group was not included in the calculation of the overall indicator importance, but the results were similar in both cases. The determined importance of indicator values could be adapted for further analysis, specifically for multicriteria evaluation, as per the conceptual model shown in Figure 1. This article provides members of the construction industry with detailed calculations and results of the evaluation of key sustainability indicators related to supply chain groups. This study explores several possible ways to measure the importance of sustainability indicators, which could provide further theoretical insights into SSCM in the construction industry and help develop an accurate sustainability index model.","PeriodicalId":509183,"journal":{"name":"Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis","volume":"86 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2024.19088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the most important sustainability indicators for SSCM in construction and gives a detailed overview of what has been scientifically accomplished in the field to date, and identifies areas for further research. The most important sustainability indicators were also grouped and presented in the literature review into the main seven assessment groups of the SSCM construction industry and ranked by experts from Northern Italy and Lithuania in several different ways. Based on the data from the Table 3, it can be inferred that a harmonious work environment among ecological sustainability indicators appeared as the most crucial indicator for respondents. Environmental education was among the most important social indicators. In the legal group, work efficiency emerged as the most significant indicator, while in the physical group, sustainable resource use was crucial. In the political realm, economic and political stability was the most important, and among technological indicators, innovation stood out. Among economic indicators, profit was the most significant sustainability indicator for respondents. A general indicator importance method combined results obtained from expert surveys using various methods. The ranking of sustainability indicators in each group was not included in the calculation of the overall indicator importance, but the results were similar in both cases. The determined importance of indicator values could be adapted for further analysis, specifically for multicriteria evaluation, as per the conceptual model shown in Figure 1. This article provides members of the construction industry with detailed calculations and results of the evaluation of key sustainability indicators related to supply chain groups. This study explores several possible ways to measure the importance of sustainability indicators, which could provide further theoretical insights into SSCM in the construction industry and help develop an accurate sustainability index model.
衡量建筑公司供应链管理的可持续性
本文对建筑业 SSCM 最重要的可持续性指标进行了分析,详细概述了该领域迄今为止所取得的科学成就,并确定了有待进一步研究的领域。在文献综述中还将最重要的可持续性指标归纳为 SSCM 建筑行业的七个主要评估组,并由来自意大利北部和立陶宛的专家以几种不同的方式进行排序。根据表 3 的数据可以推断,在生态可持续性指标中,和谐的工作环境是受访者认为最重要的指标。环境教育是最重要的社会指标之一。在法律组中,工作效率是最重要的指标,而在物质组中,资源的可持续利用至关重要。在政治领域,经济和政治稳定是最重要的指标,而在技术指标中,创新尤为突出。在经济指标中,利润是受访者认为最重要的可持续发展指标。一般指标重要性方法综合了使用各种方法进行的专家调查的结果。在计算总体指标重要性时,不包括各组可持续性指标的排序,但两者的结果相似。根据图 1 所示的概念模型,确定的指标值重要性可用于进一步分析,特别是多标准评价。本文为建筑行业成员提供了与供应链组相关的关键可持续发展指标的详细计算和评估结果。本研究探讨了衡量可持续发展指标重要性的几种可能方法,可为建筑行业的 SSCM 提供进一步的理论见解,并有助于开发精确的可持续发展指数模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信