Fighting for IP Equity: A Zoom on the Forthcoming Who Pandemic Agreement

LSE Law Review Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.61315/lselr.666
Marie-Denise Vane
{"title":"Fighting for IP Equity: A Zoom on the Forthcoming Who Pandemic Agreement","authors":"Marie-Denise Vane","doi":"10.61315/lselr.666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faced with the impact of COVID-19, WHO Member States agreed to draft and negotiate an agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. A proposal for negotiating text of this WHO Pandemic Agreement was prepared by the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body’s Bureau and shared with its Drafting Group in October 2023 for its consideration. This process should lead to the adoption of a legally binding accord. This article considers the usefulness of this international instrument for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response in relation to intellectual property (IP) to ultimately recognise such usefulness but to argue that the negotiating text could be more ambitious. It focuses on the Agreement potential to mitigate the impact of IP regulations that favour developed countries and their pharmaceutical industries. The article first highlights how the international IP system, through the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, disempowered developing countries in their battle against COVID-19. It then focuses on provisions relating to IP law found in the negotiating text to explore and question its potential to contribute to IP equity for developing countries for future pandemics. Finally, the article proposes recommendations to strengthen the impact of a WHO Pandemic Agreement in the fight for IP equity.","PeriodicalId":514338,"journal":{"name":"LSE Law Review","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61315/lselr.666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Faced with the impact of COVID-19, WHO Member States agreed to draft and negotiate an agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. A proposal for negotiating text of this WHO Pandemic Agreement was prepared by the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body’s Bureau and shared with its Drafting Group in October 2023 for its consideration. This process should lead to the adoption of a legally binding accord. This article considers the usefulness of this international instrument for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response in relation to intellectual property (IP) to ultimately recognise such usefulness but to argue that the negotiating text could be more ambitious. It focuses on the Agreement potential to mitigate the impact of IP regulations that favour developed countries and their pharmaceutical industries. The article first highlights how the international IP system, through the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, disempowered developing countries in their battle against COVID-19. It then focuses on provisions relating to IP law found in the negotiating text to explore and question its potential to contribute to IP equity for developing countries for future pandemics. Finally, the article proposes recommendations to strengthen the impact of a WHO Pandemic Agreement in the fight for IP equity.
为知识产权公平而战:即将签署的《谁是大流行病协议》放大图
面对 COVID-19 的影响,世卫组织成员国同意起草并谈判一项关于预防、准备和应对大流行病的协定。政府间谈判机构主席团编写了世卫组织大流行病协定谈判文本提案,并于 2023 年 10 月提交其起草小组审议。这一进程应导致通过一项具有法律约束力的协定。本文探讨了这一国际文书在知识产权(IP)方面对大流行病的预防、准备和应对的作用,最终承认了这一作用,但认为谈判文本可以更加雄心勃勃。文章重点论述了《协定》在减轻有利于发达国家及其制药业的知识产权法规的影响方面的潜力。文章首先强调了国际知识产权体系如何通过《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》使发展中国家在与 COVID-19 的斗争中丧失了权力。然后,文章重点论述了谈判文本中与知识产权法有关的条款,探讨并质疑其在促进发展中国家在未来大流行病中知识产权公平方面的潜力。最后,文章提出建议,以加强世卫组织《流行病协定》在争取知识产权公平方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信