Professional Skills in Family Support: A Systematic Review

Rita dos Santos, A. B. Isakov, Cátia Martins, A. Antunes, Nevenka Zegarac, Cristina Nunes
{"title":"Professional Skills in Family Support: A Systematic Review","authors":"Rita dos Santos, A. B. Isakov, Cátia Martins, A. Antunes, Nevenka Zegarac, Cristina Nunes","doi":"10.3390/socsci13030176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Family support encompasses a wide variety of professionals, sectors, and intervention paradigms that make it difficult to systematize and standardize the skills needed by the family support workforce. The present study aimed to describe the relevant skills of professionals, organize the main skills into different categories, and contribute to the development of intervention standardization guidelines in the field of family support. So, a systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out in five databases and included the analysis of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies, and all studies were qualitatively assessed. Of the initial 3334 articles identified, 59 studies were included, and four categories were identified: professionals’ qualities, essential skills common to all professions and contexts, specific knowledge, and theoretical approaches necessary for family support. Most of the studies were from the United Kingdom, qualitative, published in the last 10 years, used small samples, and included a specific group of professionals. The included studies did not specify whether some skills or characteristics were considered more effective in practice, and they had bias issues related to social desirability. The implications for family support practice are discussed, as well as the gaps to be covered in future studies.","PeriodicalId":94209,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences","volume":"2 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family support encompasses a wide variety of professionals, sectors, and intervention paradigms that make it difficult to systematize and standardize the skills needed by the family support workforce. The present study aimed to describe the relevant skills of professionals, organize the main skills into different categories, and contribute to the development of intervention standardization guidelines in the field of family support. So, a systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out in five databases and included the analysis of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies, and all studies were qualitatively assessed. Of the initial 3334 articles identified, 59 studies were included, and four categories were identified: professionals’ qualities, essential skills common to all professions and contexts, specific knowledge, and theoretical approaches necessary for family support. Most of the studies were from the United Kingdom, qualitative, published in the last 10 years, used small samples, and included a specific group of professionals. The included studies did not specify whether some skills or characteristics were considered more effective in practice, and they had bias issues related to social desirability. The implications for family support practice are discussed, as well as the gaps to be covered in future studies.
家庭支持的专业技能:系统回顾
家庭支持包括各种各样的专业人员、部门和干预模式,因此很难将家庭支持工作队伍所需的技能系统化和标准化。本研究旨在描述专业人员的相关技能,将主要技能分为不同类别,并为制定家庭支持领域的干预标准化指南做出贡献。因此,我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统的文献综述。在五个数据库中进行了搜索,包括定量、定性和混合方法研究分析,并对所有研究进行了定性评估。在最初确定的 3334 篇文章中,有 59 项研究被纳入其中,并确定了四个类别:专业人员的素质、所有专业和环境中通用的基本技能、特定知识以及家庭支持所需的理论方法。这些研究大多来自英国,属于定性研究,发表于过去十年间,使用的样本较少,并包含特定的专业群体。所纳入的研究没有具体说明某些技能或特征是否被认为在实践中更有效,而且这些研究还存在与社会可取性相关的偏差问题。本文讨论了这些研究对家庭支持实践的影响,以及未来研究中需要弥补的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信