S. Saber, Tamer M. Elmahdy, S. Elgarf, A. Swelam, Gamal Mousa, Mahmoud A. Eissa
{"title":"The controversy of management of left-sided colon obstructions: our experience","authors":"S. Saber, Tamer M. Elmahdy, S. Elgarf, A. Swelam, Gamal Mousa, Mahmoud A. Eissa","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_295_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The controversy of treatment of acute colonic obstruction between the classical Hartmann’s procedure (HP) and the on-table lavage technique with primary colorectal anastomosis (PCA) for a safe, tolerable, and definitive operation with the least complications is still standing. So we conducted this prospective study to distinguish between both techniques as regards the efficacy and safety.\n \n \n \n In group A (n _ 30) the conventional Hartmann’s procedure was done by colonic resection and construction of left-sided stoma. In the B group (n _ 30), colonic resection was followed by colonic lavage, then a primary two-layered anastomosis with covering ileostomy was performed.\n \n \n \n The whole postoperative outcomes were comparable between both techniques.\n \n \n \n We believe that on table lavage technique with colorectal anastomosis is a notable choice during the treatment of acute obstruction of the left colon.\n","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_295_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The controversy of treatment of acute colonic obstruction between the classical Hartmann’s procedure (HP) and the on-table lavage technique with primary colorectal anastomosis (PCA) for a safe, tolerable, and definitive operation with the least complications is still standing. So we conducted this prospective study to distinguish between both techniques as regards the efficacy and safety.
In group A (n _ 30) the conventional Hartmann’s procedure was done by colonic resection and construction of left-sided stoma. In the B group (n _ 30), colonic resection was followed by colonic lavage, then a primary two-layered anastomosis with covering ileostomy was performed.
The whole postoperative outcomes were comparable between both techniques.
We believe that on table lavage technique with colorectal anastomosis is a notable choice during the treatment of acute obstruction of the left colon.
在治疗急性结肠梗阻时,传统的哈特曼手术(HP)与带原发性结肠直肠吻合术(PCA)的台上灌洗技术之间,如何选择一种安全、可耐受、彻底且并发症最少的手术方法仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了这项前瞻性研究,以区分这两种技术的有效性和安全性。 A 组(n _ 30)采用传统的哈特曼手术,切除结肠并造左侧造口。在 B 组(30 人)中,结肠切除后进行结肠灌洗,然后进行原发性两层吻合并覆盖回肠造口。 两种技术的术后效果相当。 我们认为,在治疗左侧结肠急性梗阻时,台上灌洗技术与结肠直肠吻合术是一个不错的选择。