Better together: A multistakeholder approach to developing specialty-wide entrustable professional activities in emergency medicine

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Holly A. Caretta-Weyer MD, MHPE, Stefanie S. Sebok-Syer PhD, Amanda M. Morris MA, Benjamin H. Schnapp MD, MEd, Abra L. Fant MD, MS, Kevin R. Scott MD, MSEd, Matthew Pirotte MD, Michael A. Gisondi MD, Lalena M. Yarris MD, MCR
{"title":"Better together: A multistakeholder approach to developing specialty-wide entrustable professional activities in emergency medicine","authors":"Holly A. Caretta-Weyer MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Stefanie S. Sebok-Syer PhD,&nbsp;Amanda M. Morris MA,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Schnapp MD, MEd,&nbsp;Abra L. Fant MD, MS,&nbsp;Kevin R. Scott MD, MSEd,&nbsp;Matthew Pirotte MD,&nbsp;Michael A. Gisondi MD,&nbsp;Lalena M. Yarris MD, MCR","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a widely used framework for curriculum and assessment, yet the variability in emergency medicine (EM) training programs mandates the development of EPAs that meet the needs of the specialty as a whole. This requires eliciting and incorporating the perspectives of multiple stakeholders (i.e., faculty, residents, and patients) in the development of EPAs. Without a shared understanding of what a resident must be able to do upon graduation, we run the risk of advancing ill-prepared residents that may provide inconsistent care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In an effort to address these challenges, beginning in February 2020, the authors assembled an advisory board of 25 EM faculty to draft and reach consensus on a final list of EPAs that can be used across all training programs within the specialty of EM. Using modified Delphi methodology, the authors came to consensus on an initial list of 22 EPAs. The authors presented these EPAs to faculty supervisors, residents, and patients for refinement. The authors collated and analyzed feedback from focus groups of residents and patients using thematic analysis. The EPAs were subsequently refined based on this feedback.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Stakeholders in EM residency training endorsed a final revised list of 22 EPAs. Stakeholder focus groups highlighted two main thematic considerations that helped shape the finalized list of EM EPAs: attention to the meaningful nuances of EPA language and contextualizing the EPAs and viewing them developmentally.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>To foreground all key stakeholders within the EPA process for EM, the authors chose within the development process to draft; come to consensus; and refine EPAs for EM in collaboration with relevant faculty, patient, and resident stakeholders. Each stakeholder group contributed meaningfully to the content and intended implementation of the EPAs. This process may serve as a model for others in developing stakeholder-responsive EPAs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a widely used framework for curriculum and assessment, yet the variability in emergency medicine (EM) training programs mandates the development of EPAs that meet the needs of the specialty as a whole. This requires eliciting and incorporating the perspectives of multiple stakeholders (i.e., faculty, residents, and patients) in the development of EPAs. Without a shared understanding of what a resident must be able to do upon graduation, we run the risk of advancing ill-prepared residents that may provide inconsistent care.

Methods

In an effort to address these challenges, beginning in February 2020, the authors assembled an advisory board of 25 EM faculty to draft and reach consensus on a final list of EPAs that can be used across all training programs within the specialty of EM. Using modified Delphi methodology, the authors came to consensus on an initial list of 22 EPAs. The authors presented these EPAs to faculty supervisors, residents, and patients for refinement. The authors collated and analyzed feedback from focus groups of residents and patients using thematic analysis. The EPAs were subsequently refined based on this feedback.

Results

Stakeholders in EM residency training endorsed a final revised list of 22 EPAs. Stakeholder focus groups highlighted two main thematic considerations that helped shape the finalized list of EM EPAs: attention to the meaningful nuances of EPA language and contextualizing the EPAs and viewing them developmentally.

Conclusions

To foreground all key stakeholders within the EPA process for EM, the authors chose within the development process to draft; come to consensus; and refine EPAs for EM in collaboration with relevant faculty, patient, and resident stakeholders. Each stakeholder group contributed meaningfully to the content and intended implementation of the EPAs. This process may serve as a model for others in developing stakeholder-responsive EPAs.

更好地合作:以多方参与的方式开展急诊医学专业范围内的可委托专业活动
目的 可委托专业活动(EPAs)是一种广泛使用的课程和评估框架,但急诊医学(EM)培训项目的差异性要求制定的 EPAs 必须满足整个专业的需求。这就要求在制定 EPAs 时征求并采纳多方利益相关者(即教师、住院医师和患者)的观点。如果对住院医师毕业时必须具备的能力缺乏共识,我们就有可能培养出准备不足的住院医师,从而提供不一致的医疗服务。 方法 为了应对这些挑战,从 2020 年 2 月开始,作者组建了一个由 25 名急诊科教师组成的顾问委员会,以起草一份可用于急诊科专业内所有培训项目的 EPAs 最终清单并达成共识。作者使用修改过的德尔菲方法,就一份包含 22 项 EPA 的初步清单达成了共识。作者将这些 EPA 介绍给教师督导、住院医师和患者,以便对其进行完善。作者采用主题分析法整理并分析了住院医师和患者焦点小组的反馈意见。随后根据这些反馈意见对 EPA 进行了改进。 结果 急诊科住院医师培训的利益相关者认可了最终修订的 22 项 EPA。利益相关者焦点小组强调了两个主要的专题考虑因素,这有助于形成最终的EM EPAs清单:关注EPA语言的有意义的细微差别,以及EPAs的上下文和从发展的角度看待它们。 结论 为了使EPA过程中的所有关键利益相关者都能参与其中,作者选择在开发过程中与相关教师、患者和住院医师利益相关者合作起草、达成共识并完善EPA。每个利益相关群体都为 EPAs 的内容和预期实施做出了有意义的贡献。这一过程可作为其他方面制定利益相关者响应型 EPA 的范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信