Cause-of-Death Determinants of Lifespan Inequality.

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Iñaki Permanyer, Serena Vigezzi
{"title":"Cause-of-Death Determinants of Lifespan Inequality.","authors":"Iñaki Permanyer, Serena Vigezzi","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11245278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We propose a novel decomposition approach that breaks down the levels and trends of lifespan inequality as the sum of cause-of-death contributions. The suggested method shows whether the levels and changes in lifespan inequality are attributable to the levels and changes in (1) the extent of inequality in the cause-specific age-at-death distribution (the \"Inequality\" component), (2) the total share of deaths attributable to each cause (the \"Proportion\" component), or (3) the cause-specific mean age at death (the \"Mean\" component). This so-called Inequality-Proportion-Mean (or IPM) method is applied to 10 low-mortality countries in Europe. Our findings suggest that the most prevalent causes of death (in our setting, \"circulatory system\" and \"neoplasms\") do not necessarily contribute the most to overall levels of lifespan inequality. In fact, \"perinatal and congenital\" causes are the strongest drivers of lifespan inequality declines. The contribution of the IPM components to changes in lifespan inequality varies considerably across causes, genders, and countries. Among the three components, the Mean one explains the least lifespan inequality dynamics, suggesting that shifts in cause-specific mean ages at death alone contributed little to changes in lifespan inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48394,"journal":{"name":"Demography","volume":" ","pages":"513-540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11245278","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a novel decomposition approach that breaks down the levels and trends of lifespan inequality as the sum of cause-of-death contributions. The suggested method shows whether the levels and changes in lifespan inequality are attributable to the levels and changes in (1) the extent of inequality in the cause-specific age-at-death distribution (the "Inequality" component), (2) the total share of deaths attributable to each cause (the "Proportion" component), or (3) the cause-specific mean age at death (the "Mean" component). This so-called Inequality-Proportion-Mean (or IPM) method is applied to 10 low-mortality countries in Europe. Our findings suggest that the most prevalent causes of death (in our setting, "circulatory system" and "neoplasms") do not necessarily contribute the most to overall levels of lifespan inequality. In fact, "perinatal and congenital" causes are the strongest drivers of lifespan inequality declines. The contribution of the IPM components to changes in lifespan inequality varies considerably across causes, genders, and countries. Among the three components, the Mean one explains the least lifespan inequality dynamics, suggesting that shifts in cause-specific mean ages at death alone contributed little to changes in lifespan inequality.

寿命不平等的死因决定因素。
我们提出了一种新的分解方法,将寿命不平等的水平和趋势分解为死因贡献的总和。所建议的方法显示了寿命不平等的水平和变化是否可归因于以下方面的水平和变化:(1)特定死因年龄分布的不平等程度("不平等 "部分),(2)可归因于每个死因的死亡总份额("比例 "部分),或(3)特定死因的平均死亡年龄("平均 "部分)。这种所谓的 "不平等-比例-平均"(或 IPM)方法适用于欧洲 10 个死亡率较低的国家。我们的研究结果表明,最常见的死亡原因(在我们的研究中为 "循环系统 "和 "肿瘤")并不一定是造成寿命不平等总体水平的最主要原因。事实上,"围产期和先天性 "原因是寿命不平等下降的最大驱动力。不同原因、不同性别和不同国家的 IPM 构成要素对寿命不平等变化的贡献有很大差异。在这三个组成部分中,"平均年龄 "对寿命不平等动态的解释作用最小,这表明仅特定死因平均年龄的变化对寿命不平等变化的贡献很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Demography
Demography DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1964, the journal Demography has mirrored the vitality, diversity, high intellectual standard and wide impact of the field on which it reports. Demography presents the highest quality original research of scholars in a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, biology, economics, geography, history, psychology, public health, sociology, and statistics. The journal encompasses a wide variety of methodological approaches to population research. Its geographic focus is global, with articles addressing demographic matters from around the planet. Its temporal scope is broad, as represented by research that explores demographic phenomena spanning the ages from the past to the present, and reaching toward the future. Authors whose work is published in Demography benefit from the wide audience of population scientists their research will reach. Also in 2011 Demography remains the most cited journal among population studies and demographic periodicals. Published bimonthly, Demography is the flagship journal of the Population Association of America, reaching the membership of one of the largest professional demographic associations in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信