Xylem safety in relation to the stringency of plant water potential regulation of European beech, Norway spruce, and Douglas-fir trees during severe drought

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Trees Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1007/s00468-024-02499-5
Katja Schumann, Bernhard Schuldt, Miriam Fischer, Christian Ammer, Christoph Leuschner
{"title":"Xylem safety in relation to the stringency of plant water potential regulation of European beech, Norway spruce, and Douglas-fir trees during severe drought","authors":"Katja Schumann,&nbsp;Bernhard Schuldt,&nbsp;Miriam Fischer,&nbsp;Christian Ammer,&nbsp;Christoph Leuschner","doi":"10.1007/s00468-024-02499-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Key message</h3><p>Norway spruce operates with larger hydraulic safety margins (HSM) than beech and Douglas-fir despite the known drought sensitivity of spruce, questioning a pivotal role of HSM in drought tolerance.</p><h3>Abstract</h3><p>The exceptional 2018/2019 drought exposed Central Europe’s forests to severe stress, highlighting the need to better understand stomatal regulation strategies and their relationship to xylem safety under extreme drought. We studied diurnal, seasonal, and inter-annual variation in stomatal conductance (<i>g</i><sub>s</sub>) and leaf water potential (<i>Ψ</i><sub>Leaf</sub>) in co-occurring European beech (<i>F. sylvatica</i>), Norway spruce (<i>P. abies</i>), and Douglas-fir (<i>P. menziesii</i>) trees in the two summers and related them to hydraulic traits characterizing drought resistance. In 2018, <i>F. sylvatica</i> exhibited a continuous <i>Ψ</i><sub>Leaf</sub> decline from June to September, as is characteristic for an anisohydric strategy, while <i>P. abies</i> closed stomata early and reached the least negative <i>Ψ</i><sub>Leaf</sub>-values at the end of summer. <i>P. menziesii</i> showed low <i>Ψ</i><sub>Leaf</sub>-values close to <i>P</i><sub>12</sub> (the xylem pressure at onset of embolism) already in July. Both conifers closed stomata when approaching <i>P</i><sub>12</sub> and maintained low <i>g</i><sub>s</sub>-levels throughout summer, indicative for isohydric regulation. In 2019, all three species showed a linear decline in <i>Ψ</i><sub>Leaf</sub>, but <i>F. sylvatica</i> crossed P<sub>12</sub> in contrast to the conifers. The three species exhibited similar water potentials at turgor loss point (− 2.44 to − 2.51 MPa) and branch <i>P</i><sub>50</sub> (xylem pressure at 50% loss of hydraulic conductance; − 3.3 to − 3.8 MPa). Yet, <i>F. sylvatica</i> and <i>P. menziesii</i> operated with smaller hydraulic safety margins (HSM means: 0.79 and 0.77 MPa) than <i>P. abies</i> (1.28 MPa). <i>F. sylvatica</i> reduced leaf size and specific leaf area in 2019 and increased Huber value. Our species comparison during extreme drought contradicts the general assumption that conifers operate with larger HSMs than angiosperm trees. Contrary to expectation, <i>P. abies</i> appeared as hydraulically less vulnerable than Douglas-fir.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":805,"journal":{"name":"Trees","volume":"38 3","pages":"607 - 623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00468-024-02499-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-024-02499-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Key message

Norway spruce operates with larger hydraulic safety margins (HSM) than beech and Douglas-fir despite the known drought sensitivity of spruce, questioning a pivotal role of HSM in drought tolerance.

Abstract

The exceptional 2018/2019 drought exposed Central Europe’s forests to severe stress, highlighting the need to better understand stomatal regulation strategies and their relationship to xylem safety under extreme drought. We studied diurnal, seasonal, and inter-annual variation in stomatal conductance (gs) and leaf water potential (ΨLeaf) in co-occurring European beech (F. sylvatica), Norway spruce (P. abies), and Douglas-fir (P. menziesii) trees in the two summers and related them to hydraulic traits characterizing drought resistance. In 2018, F. sylvatica exhibited a continuous ΨLeaf decline from June to September, as is characteristic for an anisohydric strategy, while P. abies closed stomata early and reached the least negative ΨLeaf-values at the end of summer. P. menziesii showed low ΨLeaf-values close to P12 (the xylem pressure at onset of embolism) already in July. Both conifers closed stomata when approaching P12 and maintained low gs-levels throughout summer, indicative for isohydric regulation. In 2019, all three species showed a linear decline in ΨLeaf, but F. sylvatica crossed P12 in contrast to the conifers. The three species exhibited similar water potentials at turgor loss point (− 2.44 to − 2.51 MPa) and branch P50 (xylem pressure at 50% loss of hydraulic conductance; − 3.3 to − 3.8 MPa). Yet, F. sylvatica and P. menziesii operated with smaller hydraulic safety margins (HSM means: 0.79 and 0.77 MPa) than P. abies (1.28 MPa). F. sylvatica reduced leaf size and specific leaf area in 2019 and increased Huber value. Our species comparison during extreme drought contradicts the general assumption that conifers operate with larger HSMs than angiosperm trees. Contrary to expectation, P. abies appeared as hydraulically less vulnerable than Douglas-fir.

Abstract Image

欧洲山毛榉、挪威云杉和花旗松在严重干旱期间木质部安全与植物水势调节严格程度的关系
关键信息尽管已知云杉对干旱敏感,但与山毛榉和花旗松相比,挪威云杉具有更大的水力安全裕度(HSM),这质疑了水力安全裕度在耐旱性中的关键作用.摘要2018/2019年的特大干旱使中欧森林面临严重胁迫,突出表明需要更好地了解气孔调节策略及其与极端干旱下木质部安全的关系。我们研究了共生欧洲山毛榉(F. sylvatica)、挪威云杉(P. abies)和花旗松(P. menziesii)树木的气孔导度(gs)和叶片水势(ΨLeaf)在两个夏季的昼夜、季节和年际变化,并将它们与表征抗旱性的水力特征联系起来。2018年,F. sylvatica的ΨLeaf值从6月到9月持续下降,这是异水策略的特征;而P. abies则很早就关闭了气孔,并在夏末达到最小的负ΨLeaf值。红叶石楠的ΨLeaf-值很低,在七月份就已接近 P12(栓塞开始时的木质部压力)。两种针叶树在接近 P12 时都关闭了气孔,并在整个夏季保持较低的 gs 水平,这表明存在等水调节。2019 年,所有三个树种的Ψ叶片都呈线性下降趋势,但与针叶树不同的是,箭叶榕越过了 P12。这三个物种在失去张力点(- 2.44 到 - 2.51 兆帕)和枝条 P50(失去 50%水力传导时的木质部压力;- 3.3 到 - 3.8 兆帕)处表现出相似的水势。然而,F. sylvatica 和 P. menziesii 的水力安全裕度(HSM 平均值:0.79 和 0.77 兆帕)小于 P. abies(1.28 兆帕)。2019年,F. sylvatica的叶片尺寸和比叶面积减小,Huber值增大。我们在极端干旱期间进行的物种比较与针叶树比被子植物具有更大 HSM 的一般假设相矛盾。与预期相反的是,黑松的水力脆弱程度低于花旗松。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees
Trees 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Trees - Structure and Function publishes original articles on the physiology, biochemistry, functional anatomy, structure and ecology of trees and other woody plants. Also presented are articles concerned with pathology and technological problems, when they contribute to the basic understanding of structure and function of trees. In addition to original articles and short communications, the journal publishes reviews on selected topics concerning the structure and function of trees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信