Make peer review great (again?)

IF 1 2区历史学 Q4 BUSINESS

Business History Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1080/00076791.2024.2324877

Anders Ravn Sørensen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this reply I comment on the editorial by Lubinski, Decker, and MacKenzie. I applaud the editors’ initiative to raise a discussion on peer-review, and point to the need for a new valuation of the...

查看原文本刊更多论文

让同行评审变得伟大（再次？）

在这篇回信中，我对 Lubinski、Decker 和 MacKenzie 的社论进行了评论。我赞赏编辑们提出关于同行评审讨论的倡议，并指出需要对同行评审进行新的评估。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Business History Multiple-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Business History is an international journal concerned with the long-run evolution and contemporary operation of business systems and enterprises. Its primary purpose is to make available the findings of advanced research, empirical and conceptual, into matters of global significance, such as corporate organization and growth, multinational enterprise, business efficiency, entrepreneurship, technological change, finance, marketing, human resource management, professionalization and business culture. The journal has won a reputation for academic excellence and has a wide readership amongst management specialists, economists and other social scientists and economic, social, labour and business historians.