Distinct changes in soil organic matter quality, quantity and biochemical composition in response to land-use change to diverse cropping systems and agroforestry in north-western India

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Sandeep Sharma, Gagandeep Kaur, Pritpal Singh, Raminder Singh Ghuman, Pawitar Singh, Pratibha Vyas
{"title":"Distinct changes in soil organic matter quality, quantity and biochemical composition in response to land-use change to diverse cropping systems and agroforestry in north-western India","authors":"Sandeep Sharma,&nbsp;Gagandeep Kaur,&nbsp;Pritpal Singh,&nbsp;Raminder Singh Ghuman,&nbsp;Pawitar Singh,&nbsp;Pratibha Vyas","doi":"10.1007/s10457-024-00976-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The quantification of change in total organic carbon (TOC) pool and its fractions in relation to altered soil enzymatic activity during long-term vegetation refurbishment is considered critically important for managing and restoration of landscapes. Landscapes have contrasting impacts on soils’ biochemical and biological composition, which eventually affect soil aggregation, carbon (C) fractions and enzyme activities. We therefore, examined the response of different landscapes viz. poplar-based agroforestry, rice–potato–maize, rice–wheat and maize–wheat cropping vis-à-vis uncultivated soils of north-western India on soil aggregation, C fractions and enzyme activities. We hypothesized that both plants mediated C and exogenous C input would exert differential impacts on organic C pool in soils under different landscapes in response to diverse cropping practices. Landscapes significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) influenced microbial activities, soil enzymes, C fractions, TOC and the process of soil aggregation. Soils’ physical, chemical and biological properties were significantly improved under poplar-based agroforestry system, following rice–potato–maize system, whilst had the lowest effect in the uncultivated soils. The uncultivated landscapes significantly lost TOC by ~ 1.6, 2.1, 2.9 and 2.7-times, respectively than the soils under maize–wheat, rice–wheat, rice–potato–maize and poplar-based agroforestry. Rice–potato–maize cropping resulted in ~ 13.6% higher C stabilization in passive C pool, compared with rice–wheat cropping system. Macro-and micro-aggregates formation was significantly improved due to establishment of poplar-based agroforestry as well as rice–potato–maize systems over the others. Correlation matrix elucidated easily extractable glomalin concentration as potential determinant influencing soil enzymatic activity; e.g. cellulase (r = 0.854**; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and xylanase (r = 0.969**; <i>p</i>&lt; 0.001 ). These results enlightened knowledge on soil aggregation, C fractions and enzyme activities in different landscapes, which help enhance C sequestration and eventually the C restoration in studied landscapes. This study suggests that to overcome problems originated from intensive rice–wheat cropping system for which poplar-based agroforestry and rice–potato–maize system could be another best option.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"98 4","pages":"1049 - 1073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-024-00976-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quantification of change in total organic carbon (TOC) pool and its fractions in relation to altered soil enzymatic activity during long-term vegetation refurbishment is considered critically important for managing and restoration of landscapes. Landscapes have contrasting impacts on soils’ biochemical and biological composition, which eventually affect soil aggregation, carbon (C) fractions and enzyme activities. We therefore, examined the response of different landscapes viz. poplar-based agroforestry, rice–potato–maize, rice–wheat and maize–wheat cropping vis-à-vis uncultivated soils of north-western India on soil aggregation, C fractions and enzyme activities. We hypothesized that both plants mediated C and exogenous C input would exert differential impacts on organic C pool in soils under different landscapes in response to diverse cropping practices. Landscapes significantly (p < 0.05) influenced microbial activities, soil enzymes, C fractions, TOC and the process of soil aggregation. Soils’ physical, chemical and biological properties were significantly improved under poplar-based agroforestry system, following rice–potato–maize system, whilst had the lowest effect in the uncultivated soils. The uncultivated landscapes significantly lost TOC by ~ 1.6, 2.1, 2.9 and 2.7-times, respectively than the soils under maize–wheat, rice–wheat, rice–potato–maize and poplar-based agroforestry. Rice–potato–maize cropping resulted in ~ 13.6% higher C stabilization in passive C pool, compared with rice–wheat cropping system. Macro-and micro-aggregates formation was significantly improved due to establishment of poplar-based agroforestry as well as rice–potato–maize systems over the others. Correlation matrix elucidated easily extractable glomalin concentration as potential determinant influencing soil enzymatic activity; e.g. cellulase (r = 0.854**; p < 0.01) and xylanase (r = 0.969**; p< 0.001 ). These results enlightened knowledge on soil aggregation, C fractions and enzyme activities in different landscapes, which help enhance C sequestration and eventually the C restoration in studied landscapes. This study suggests that to overcome problems originated from intensive rice–wheat cropping system for which poplar-based agroforestry and rice–potato–maize system could be another best option.

Abstract Image

印度西北部土壤有机物质的质量、数量和生化组成随着土地使用方式转变为多样化种植系统和农林业而发生的不同变化
在长期植被恢复过程中,总有机碳(TOC)库及其组分的变化与土壤酶活性的改变有关,对管理和恢复景观至关重要。景观对土壤的生物化学和生物组成有着截然不同的影响,这些影响最终会影响土壤团聚、碳(C)组分和酶活性。因此,我们研究了印度西北部以杨树为基础的农林业、水稻-土豆-玉米、水稻-小麦和玉米-小麦种植等不同景观与未开垦土壤对土壤团聚、碳组分和酶活性的影响。我们假设,在不同地貌条件下,植物介导的碳和外源碳输入会对土壤中的有机碳库产生不同的影响,以应对不同的种植方式。地貌对微生物活动、土壤酶、碳组分、总有机碳和土壤团聚过程有明显影响(p < 0.05)。在以杨树为基础的农林系统中,土壤的物理、化学和生物特性在水稻-土豆-玉米系统之后得到了明显改善,而在未开垦的土壤中影响最小。与玉米-小麦、水稻-小麦、水稻-土豆-玉米和以杨树为主的农林业相比,未开垦土壤的总有机碳损失分别为 1.6 倍、2.1 倍、2.9 倍和 2.7 倍。与水稻-小麦种植系统相比,水稻-土豆-玉米种植系统在被动碳库中的碳稳定度高出约 13.6%。杨树农林业和水稻-马铃薯-玉米种植系统与其他种植系统相比,大大改善了宏观和微观聚集体的形成。相关矩阵阐明了易提取的胶霉素浓度是影响土壤酶活性的潜在决定因素,如纤维素酶(r = 0.854**;p <;0.01)和木聚糖酶(r = 0.969**;p <;0.001)。这些结果启发了人们对不同景观中土壤团聚、碳组分和酶活性的认识,有助于提高固碳能力,并最终恢复所研究景观中的碳含量。这项研究表明,要克服密集型水稻-小麦种植系统带来的问题,以杨树为基础的农林业和水稻-土豆-玉米系统可能是另一种最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信