Amitriptyline effectiveness in burning mouth syndrome: An in-depth case series analysis.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gerodontology Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1111/ger.12750
Douglas Rodrigues Gonçalves, Leonardo Monteiro Botelho, Vinícius Coelho Carrard, Marco Antônio Trevizani Martins, Fernanda Visioli
{"title":"Amitriptyline effectiveness in burning mouth syndrome: An in-depth case series analysis.","authors":"Douglas Rodrigues Gonçalves, Leonardo Monteiro Botelho, Vinícius Coelho Carrard, Marco Antônio Trevizani Martins, Fernanda Visioli","doi":"10.1111/ger.12750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of amitriptyline (AMT), and to identify the determinants of the treatment's effectiveness in patients diagnosed with burning mouth syndrome (BMS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of BMS is challenging and no established treatment protocol is available. AMT may be an important treatment option, cout not all patients benefit from this drug. Studies assessing factors related to treatment response are valuable in improving decision-making.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This case series study examined the medical records of all patients diagnosed with BMS at an oral medicine unit in a university hospital from 2008 to 2022. The patients were divided into responders to AMT and non-responders to AMT. Data on demographic information, comorbidities, medications, types of symptoms and oral subsites affected were collected. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association between the independent variables and the outcome, using the Chi-squared test (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and fourty-nine patients reported a burning mouth sensation, 50 of them (14.3%) being diagnosed with primary BMS. Of these, 35 were treated with AMT, and 26 (74.2%) responded significantly to AMT. All males responded to AMT, whereas only 67.9% of females responded. The mean dose of AMT among responders was 29.8 ± 12.3 mg, with most patients achieving a response with 25 mg (61.5% of patients), followed by 50 mg (23%). The concomitant use of an anticonvulsant resulted in non-response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMT may be effective in BMS management for most patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12583,"journal":{"name":"Gerodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of amitriptyline (AMT), and to identify the determinants of the treatment's effectiveness in patients diagnosed with burning mouth syndrome (BMS).

Background: Treatment of BMS is challenging and no established treatment protocol is available. AMT may be an important treatment option, cout not all patients benefit from this drug. Studies assessing factors related to treatment response are valuable in improving decision-making.

Materials and methods: This case series study examined the medical records of all patients diagnosed with BMS at an oral medicine unit in a university hospital from 2008 to 2022. The patients were divided into responders to AMT and non-responders to AMT. Data on demographic information, comorbidities, medications, types of symptoms and oral subsites affected were collected. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association between the independent variables and the outcome, using the Chi-squared test (P < .05).

Results: Three hundred and fourty-nine patients reported a burning mouth sensation, 50 of them (14.3%) being diagnosed with primary BMS. Of these, 35 were treated with AMT, and 26 (74.2%) responded significantly to AMT. All males responded to AMT, whereas only 67.9% of females responded. The mean dose of AMT among responders was 29.8 ± 12.3 mg, with most patients achieving a response with 25 mg (61.5% of patients), followed by 50 mg (23%). The concomitant use of an anticonvulsant resulted in non-response.

Conclusions: AMT may be effective in BMS management for most patients.

阿米替林对灼口综合征的疗效:深入病例系列分析
目的:评估阿米替林(AMT)的疗效,并确定诊断为烧灼口腔综合征(BMS)患者的疗效决定因素:评估阿米替林(AMT)的疗效,并确定对确诊为烧灼口腔综合征(BMS)患者的疗效决定因素:背景:灼热口腔综合征的治疗具有挑战性,目前尚无成熟的治疗方案。背景:口腔灼烧综合征的治疗具有挑战性,目前尚无成熟的治疗方案。AMT可能是一种重要的治疗选择,但并非所有患者都能从这种药物中获益。评估治疗反应相关因素的研究对于改善决策很有价值:这项病例系列研究调查了一家大学医院口腔内科在 2008 年至 2022 年期间诊断为 BMS 的所有患者的病历。患者被分为对 AMT 有反应者和对 AMT 无反应者。收集的数据包括人口统计学信息、合并症、药物、症状类型和受影响的口腔亚部位。使用卡方检验(P 结果)对自变量和结果之间的关联进行了描述性分析和双变量分析:349 名患者报告有口腔烧灼感,其中 50 人(14.3%)被诊断为原发性 BMS。其中 35 人接受了 AMT 治疗,26 人(74.2%)对 AMT 有明显反应。所有男性都对 AMT 有反应,而只有 67.9% 的女性有反应。应答者的 AMT 平均剂量为 29.8 ± 12.3 毫克,大多数患者在服用 25 毫克(61.5% 的患者)后出现应答,其次是 50 毫克(23% 的患者)。同时使用抗惊厥药会导致无应答:结论:对大多数患者而言,AMT 可有效治疗 BMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerodontology
Gerodontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Gerodontology is to improve the quality of life and oral health of older people. The boundaries of most conventional dental specialties must be repeatedly crossed to provide optimal dental care for older people. In addition, management of other health problems impacts on dental care and clinicians need knowledge in these numerous overlapping areas. Bringing together these diverse topics within one journal serves clinicians who are seeking to read and to publish papers across a broad spectrum of specialties. This journal provides the juxtaposition of papers from traditional specialties but which share this patient-centred interest, providing a synergy that serves progress in the subject of gerodontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信