There is No End to Learning, but How Does it Begin? A Meta-Analysis of the Team Learning Pathway

IF 7 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1111/joms.13064

Shannon L. Marlow, Christina N. Lacerenza

{"title":"There is No End to Learning, but How Does it Begin? A Meta-Analysis of the Team Learning Pathway","authors":"Shannon L. Marlow, Christina N. Lacerenza","doi":"10.1111/joms.13064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We complete a meta-analytic investigation across two phases to increase understanding about team learning, an important process that is a challenge for teams to enact. In the first phase, we create a meta-analytic database of 198 independent samples (N = 15,536 teams) to summarize the strength of the relationships between learning and team antecedents and outcomes. Motivational emergent states (e.g., potency) exhibited the strongest relationship with learning, followed by affective (e.g., psychological safety) and cognitive (e.g., trust) emergent states. Our results also highlight the positive relationship between learning and various antecedents, including team structure, supportive organizational context, environmental uncertainty, cognitive diversity, and gender diversity. In the second phase, we create an additional meta-analytic database with 53 independent samples (N = 4,468 teams) to test a serial mediation model, demonstrating that psychological safety and learning serially mediate the relationships between team learning orientation and salient team outcomes (i.e., performance and innovation).","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We complete a meta-analytic investigation across two phases to increase understanding about team learning, an important process that is a challenge for teams to enact. In the first phase, we create a meta-analytic database of 198 independent samples (N = 15,536 teams) to summarize the strength of the relationships between learning and team antecedents and outcomes. Motivational emergent states (e.g., potency) exhibited the strongest relationship with learning, followed by affective (e.g., psychological safety) and cognitive (e.g., trust) emergent states. Our results also highlight the positive relationship between learning and various antecedents, including team structure, supportive organizational context, environmental uncertainty, cognitive diversity, and gender diversity. In the second phase, we create an additional meta-analytic database with 53 independent samples (N = 4,468 teams) to test a serial mediation model, demonstrating that psychological safety and learning serially mediate the relationships between team learning orientation and salient team outcomes (i.e., performance and innovation).

查看原文本刊更多论文

学习没有终点，但如何开始？团队学习途径的元分析

我们分两个阶段完成了一项荟萃分析调查，以加深对团队学习的理解，团队学习是一个重要的过程，但对团队来说却是一项挑战。在第一阶段，我们创建了一个包含 198 个独立样本（N = 15,536 个团队）的元分析数据库，以总结学习与团队前因后果之间的关系强度。激励性突发状态（如效力）与学习的关系最为密切，其次是情感性突发状态（如心理安全）和认知性突发状态（如信任）。我们的研究结果还强调了学习与各种先决条件之间的积极关系，包括团队结构、支持性组织环境、环境不确定性、认知多样性和性别多样性。在第二阶段，我们创建了一个额外的元分析数据库，包含 53 个独立样本（N = 4468 个团队），以检验序列中介模型，证明心理安全和学习序列中介了团队学习导向与团队显著结果（即绩效和创新）之间的关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Management Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

16.40

自引率

5.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.