“Cold feet”: A qualitative study of medical students who seriously considered emergency medicine but chose another specialty

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Arvin R. Akhavan MD, MPA, Amy V. Kontrick MD, Haley Egan MD, Stephanie A. Balint MSN, Bryan G. Kane MD, Joseph B. House MD, Charles S. Graffeo MD, D. Mark Courtney MD, MS, Dave W. Lu MD, MS, MBE
{"title":"“Cold feet”: A qualitative study of medical students who seriously considered emergency medicine but chose another specialty","authors":"Arvin R. Akhavan MD, MPA,&nbsp;Amy V. Kontrick MD,&nbsp;Haley Egan MD,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Balint MSN,&nbsp;Bryan G. Kane MD,&nbsp;Joseph B. House MD,&nbsp;Charles S. Graffeo MD,&nbsp;D. Mark Courtney MD, MS,&nbsp;Dave W. Lu MD, MS, MBE","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency medicine (EM) has historically been among the most competitive specialties in the United States. However, in 2022 and 2023, 219 of 2921 and 554 of 3010 respective National Resident Matching Program positions were initially unfilled. Medical students’ selection of a medical specialty is a complex process. To better understand recent trends in the EM residency match, this qualitative study explored through one-on-one interviews the rationale of senior medical students who seriously considered EM but ultimately pursued another specialty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A convenience sample of senior medical students from across the United States was recruited via multiple mechanisms after the 2023 match. Participant characteristics were collected via an online survey. Qualitative data were generated through a series of one-on-one semistructured interviews and thematic analysis of the data was performed using a constant comparative approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen senior medical students from 12 different institutions participated in the study. Thematic saturation was reached after 12 interviews but data from all 16 interviews were included for qualitative analyses. Five major themes emerged as important in students’ consideration but ultimate rejection of EM as a career: (1) innate features of EM attracted or dissuaded students, (2) widespread awareness of a recent workforce report, (3) burnout in EM, (4) their perception of EM's standing in the health care landscape, and (5) early EM experience and exposure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This qualitative study identified five major themes in the career decisions of senior medical students who seriously considered EM but chose another specialty. These findings may help inform the perceptions of students and guide future EM recruitment efforts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Emergency medicine (EM) has historically been among the most competitive specialties in the United States. However, in 2022 and 2023, 219 of 2921 and 554 of 3010 respective National Resident Matching Program positions were initially unfilled. Medical students’ selection of a medical specialty is a complex process. To better understand recent trends in the EM residency match, this qualitative study explored through one-on-one interviews the rationale of senior medical students who seriously considered EM but ultimately pursued another specialty.

Methods

A convenience sample of senior medical students from across the United States was recruited via multiple mechanisms after the 2023 match. Participant characteristics were collected via an online survey. Qualitative data were generated through a series of one-on-one semistructured interviews and thematic analysis of the data was performed using a constant comparative approach.

Results

Sixteen senior medical students from 12 different institutions participated in the study. Thematic saturation was reached after 12 interviews but data from all 16 interviews were included for qualitative analyses. Five major themes emerged as important in students’ consideration but ultimate rejection of EM as a career: (1) innate features of EM attracted or dissuaded students, (2) widespread awareness of a recent workforce report, (3) burnout in EM, (4) their perception of EM's standing in the health care landscape, and (5) early EM experience and exposure.

Conclusions

This qualitative study identified five major themes in the career decisions of senior medical students who seriously considered EM but chose another specialty. These findings may help inform the perceptions of students and guide future EM recruitment efforts.

"冷脚":对认真考虑过急诊医学但选择了其他专业的医学生的定性研究
引言 急诊医学(EM)历来是美国竞争最激烈的专业之一。然而,在 2022 年和 2023 年,分别有 2921 个和 3010 个国家住院医师配对计划职位中的 219 个和 554 个最初未填补。医学生选择医学专业是一个复杂的过程。为了更好地了解最近新兴医学住院医师匹配的趋势,本定性研究通过一对一访谈,探讨了认真考虑过新兴医学但最终选择了其他专业的高年级医学生的理由。 方法 在2023年比赛结束后,通过多种机制从美国各地招募高年级医学生作为方便样本。通过在线调查收集参与者的特征。通过一系列一对一的半结构化访谈获得定性数据,并采用恒定比较法对数据进行主题分析。 结果 来自 12 所不同院校的 16 名高年级医学生参与了研究。在进行了 12 次访谈后,主题达到饱和,但所有 16 次访谈的数据都被纳入定性分析。在学生考虑但最终拒绝将医学作为职业时,有五大主题:(1)医学的先天特征吸引或劝阻了学生;(2)对最近一份劳动力报告的广泛认识;(3)医学中的职业倦怠;(4)他们对医学在医疗保健领域地位的看法;(5)早期的医学经历和接触。 结论 这项定性研究发现了高年级医学生职业决定中的五大主题,他们曾认真考虑过电磁学,但最终选择了其他专业。这些发现可能有助于了解学生的看法,并指导未来的 EM 招聘工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信