Restoring trust in sustainability reporting: the enabling role of the external assurance

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Simone Pizzi, Andrea Venturelli, Fabio Caputo
{"title":"Restoring trust in sustainability reporting: the enabling role of the external assurance","authors":"Simone Pizzi,&nbsp;Andrea Venturelli,&nbsp;Fabio Caputo","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the current scenario characterized by distrust about business contributions to sustainable development, it is necessary to identify new tools to legitimate companies’ operations. The main initiatives launched by supranational institutions and standard setters contributed to this goal by providing new reporting standards to encourage companies to disclose their environmental, social, and governance information on a mandatory or voluntary basis. However, the proliferation of reports prepared by companies with different attitudes toward sustainable development underlined the need to identify alternative accountability mechanisms to restore the signaling effects of adopting these technologies. In particular, a key role is covered by external assurance mechanisms, which represent an emerging research stream in accounting research. According to this evidence, our contribution aims to contribute to this debate through a science mapping of the existing knowledge about external assurance. The insights collected revealed that academics identified a set of information about the main constraints and opportunities related to adopting external assurance mechanisms that could support the recent initiatives launched by international organizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 101437"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343524000241/pdfft?md5=1a8ae47524db3f187781d9e1ba15effa&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343524000241-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343524000241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current scenario characterized by distrust about business contributions to sustainable development, it is necessary to identify new tools to legitimate companies’ operations. The main initiatives launched by supranational institutions and standard setters contributed to this goal by providing new reporting standards to encourage companies to disclose their environmental, social, and governance information on a mandatory or voluntary basis. However, the proliferation of reports prepared by companies with different attitudes toward sustainable development underlined the need to identify alternative accountability mechanisms to restore the signaling effects of adopting these technologies. In particular, a key role is covered by external assurance mechanisms, which represent an emerging research stream in accounting research. According to this evidence, our contribution aims to contribute to this debate through a science mapping of the existing knowledge about external assurance. The insights collected revealed that academics identified a set of information about the main constraints and opportunities related to adopting external assurance mechanisms that could support the recent initiatives launched by international organizations.

恢复对可持续发展报告的信任:外部保证的促进作用
在当前企业对可持续发展的贡献不被信任的情况下,有必要确定新的工具,使公司的运营合法化。超国家机构和标准制定者发起的主要倡议为实现这一目标做出了贡献,它们提供了新的报告标准,鼓励公司在强制或自愿的基础上披露其环境、社会和治理信息。然而,对可持续发展持不同态度的公司编写的报告大量涌现,这突出表明有必要确定替代问责机制,以恢复采用这些技术的信号效应。其中,外部保证机制发挥了关键作用,它是会计研究领域的一个新兴研究方向。根据这一证据,我们的贡献旨在通过对现有的外部保证知识进行科学规划,为这一辩论做出贡献。所收集到的见解表明,学术界确定了一套与采用外部保证机制有关的主要制约因素和机遇方面的信息,可为国际组织最近发起的倡议提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信