Comparative evaluation of Borrelia burgdorferi antibody detection between the VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Elise H. Krcatovich, Jason Workman, Karen Stasiak, Richard E Goldstein
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of Borrelia burgdorferi antibody detection between the VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus","authors":"Elise H. Krcatovich,&nbsp;Jason Workman,&nbsp;Karen Stasiak,&nbsp;Richard E Goldstein","doi":"10.1016/j.tcam.2024.100862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two studies were developed to compare <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> antibody detection between the VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus tests. The objective of the first study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus <em>B. burgdorferi</em> results using field sourced samples compared to a Western Blot reference method. The sensitivity and specificity of VetScan Flex4 were 81.9 % (95 % CI: 71.9 %-89.5 %) and 89.3 % (95 % CI: 85.2 %-92.9 %) respectively, and SNAP 4Dx Plus's sensitivity and specificity were 80.7 % (95 % CI: 70.6 %-88.6 %) and 92.8 % (95 % CI: 89.1 %-95.5 %) respectively. When comparing VetScan Flex4 and Snap 4Dx Plus, the Simple Kappa Coefficient estimate was 0.76 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.84) indicating substantial agreement between the two methods. McNemar's Test revealed concordance between the two methods was not statistically significant (<em>P</em> = 0.05). The objective of the second study was to evaluate whether VetScan Flex4 differentiates between <em>B. burgdorferi</em> antibodies derived from infection versus vaccination with commonly used canine Lyme vaccines. The sensitivity and specificity of the VetScan Flex4 in differentiating canine Lyme vaccination from infection with <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> were 100 % (Se 95 % CI: 78.2 %-100 %; Sp 95 % CI: 91.2 %-100 %). In conclusion, the VetScan Flex4 is a reliably sensitive and specific point-of-care test that is similar to Snap 4Dx Plus, can differentiate between infection and Lyme vaccination, and can be utilized by veterinarians for Lyme disease diagnosis and surveillance of <em>B. burgdorferi</em> exposure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23144,"journal":{"name":"Topics in companion animal medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1938973624000187/pdfft?md5=dd65bd192700c98f4072fa03e5826a69&pid=1-s2.0-S1938973624000187-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in companion animal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1938973624000187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two studies were developed to compare Borrelia burgdorferi antibody detection between the VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus tests. The objective of the first study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus B. burgdorferi results using field sourced samples compared to a Western Blot reference method. The sensitivity and specificity of VetScan Flex4 were 81.9 % (95 % CI: 71.9 %-89.5 %) and 89.3 % (95 % CI: 85.2 %-92.9 %) respectively, and SNAP 4Dx Plus's sensitivity and specificity were 80.7 % (95 % CI: 70.6 %-88.6 %) and 92.8 % (95 % CI: 89.1 %-95.5 %) respectively. When comparing VetScan Flex4 and Snap 4Dx Plus, the Simple Kappa Coefficient estimate was 0.76 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.84) indicating substantial agreement between the two methods. McNemar's Test revealed concordance between the two methods was not statistically significant (P = 0.05). The objective of the second study was to evaluate whether VetScan Flex4 differentiates between B. burgdorferi antibodies derived from infection versus vaccination with commonly used canine Lyme vaccines. The sensitivity and specificity of the VetScan Flex4 in differentiating canine Lyme vaccination from infection with Borrelia burgdorferi were 100 % (Se 95 % CI: 78.2 %-100 %; Sp 95 % CI: 91.2 %-100 %). In conclusion, the VetScan Flex4 is a reliably sensitive and specific point-of-care test that is similar to Snap 4Dx Plus, can differentiate between infection and Lyme vaccination, and can be utilized by veterinarians for Lyme disease diagnosis and surveillance of B. burgdorferi exposure.

VetScan Flex4 和 SNAP 4Dx Plus 对布氏杆菌抗体检测的比较评估。
为了比较 VetScan Flex4 和 SNAP 4Dx Plus 两种检测方法对布氏杆菌抗体的检测效果,我们进行了两项研究。第一项研究的目的是评估 VetScan Flex4 和 SNAP 4Dx Plus B. burgdorferi 检测结果的诊断灵敏度(Se)和特异性(Sp)。VetScan Flex4的灵敏度和特异性分别为81.9%(95% CI:71.9%-89.5%)和89.3%(95% CI:85.2%-92.9%),SNAP 4Dx Plus的灵敏度和特异性分别为80.7%(95% CI:70.6%-88.6%)和92.8%(95% CI:89.1%-95.5%)。在比较 VetScan Flex4 和 Snap 4Dx Plus 时,简单卡帕系数估计值为 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84),表明两种方法的一致性很高。McNemar 检验表明,两种方法之间的一致性没有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。第二项研究的目的是评估 VetScan Flex4 是否能区分来自感染的 B. burgdorferi 抗体和来自接种常用莱姆犬疫苗的 B. burgdorferi 抗体。VetScan Flex4在区分犬莱姆疫苗接种和感染布氏杆菌方面的灵敏度和特异性均为100%(Se 95% CI:78.2%-100%;Sp 95% CI:91.2%-100%)。总之,VetScan Flex4 是一种灵敏度高、特异性强的可靠的护理点检验,它与 Snap 4Dx Plus 相似,可以区分感染和莱姆疫苗接种,兽医可以用它来诊断莱姆病和监测布氏杆菌暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in companion animal medicine
Topics in companion animal medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Published quarterly, Topics in Companion Animal Medicine is a peer-reviewed veterinary scientific journal dedicated to providing practitioners with the most recent advances in companion animal medicine. The journal publishes high quality original clinical research focusing on important topics in companion animal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信