Effectiveness of a Smartphone App to Promote Physical Activity Among Persons With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Stephanie E Bonn, Madeleine Hummel, Giulia Peveri, Helén Eke, Christina Alexandrou, Rino Bellocco, Marie Löf, Ylva Trolle Lagerros
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Smartphone App to Promote Physical Activity Among Persons With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Stephanie E Bonn, Madeleine Hummel, Giulia Peveri, Helén Eke, Christina Alexandrou, Rino Bellocco, Marie Löf, Ylva Trolle Lagerros","doi":"10.2196/53054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity is well known to have beneficial effects on glycemic control and to reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease in persons with type 2 diabetes. Yet, successful implementation of lifestyle interventions targeting physical activity in primary care has shown to be difficult. Smartphone apps may provide useful tools to support physical activity. The DiaCert app was specifically designed for integration into primary care and is an automated mobile health (mHealth) solution promoting daily walking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of a 3-month-long intervention promoting physical activity through the use of the DiaCert app among persons with type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Our primary objective was to assess the effect on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 3 months of follow-up. Our secondary objective was to assess the effect on MVPA at 6 months of follow-up and on BMI, waist circumference, hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub>, blood lipids, and blood pressure at 3 and 6 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited men and women with type 2 diabetes from 5 primary health care centers and 1 specialized center. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control group. The intervention group was administered standard care and access to the DiaCert app at baseline and 3 months onward. The control group received standard care only. Outcomes of objectively measured physical activity using accelerometers, BMI, waist circumference, biomarkers, and blood pressure were assessed at baseline and follow-ups. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences in outcomes between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 study participants, 65.7% (119/181) men and 34.3% (62/181) women, were recruited into the study and randomized to the intervention (n=93) or control group (n=88). The participants' mean age and BMI were 60.0 (SD 11.4) years and 30.4 (SD 5.3) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. We found no significant effect of the intervention (group by time interaction) on MVPA at either the 3-month (β=1.51, 95% CI -5.53 to 8.55) or the 6-month (β=-3.53, 95% CI -10.97 to 3.92) follow-up. We found no effect on any of the secondary outcomes at follow-ups, except for a significant effect on BMI at 6 months (β=0.52, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.84). However, mean BMI did not differ between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that persons with type 2 diabetes being randomized to use an app promoting daily walking increased their levels of MVPA at 3 or 6 months' follow-up compared with controls receiving standard care. The effect of the app on BMI was unclear, and we found nothing to support an effect on secondary outcomes. Further research is needed to determine what type of mHealth intervention could be effective to increase physical activity among persons with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03053336; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03053336.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"e53054"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10995783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity is well known to have beneficial effects on glycemic control and to reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease in persons with type 2 diabetes. Yet, successful implementation of lifestyle interventions targeting physical activity in primary care has shown to be difficult. Smartphone apps may provide useful tools to support physical activity. The DiaCert app was specifically designed for integration into primary care and is an automated mobile health (mHealth) solution promoting daily walking.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of a 3-month-long intervention promoting physical activity through the use of the DiaCert app among persons with type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Our primary objective was to assess the effect on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 3 months of follow-up. Our secondary objective was to assess the effect on MVPA at 6 months of follow-up and on BMI, waist circumference, hemoglobin A1c, blood lipids, and blood pressure at 3 and 6 months of follow-up.

Methods: We recruited men and women with type 2 diabetes from 5 primary health care centers and 1 specialized center. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control group. The intervention group was administered standard care and access to the DiaCert app at baseline and 3 months onward. The control group received standard care only. Outcomes of objectively measured physical activity using accelerometers, BMI, waist circumference, biomarkers, and blood pressure were assessed at baseline and follow-ups. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences in outcomes between the groups.

Results: A total of 181 study participants, 65.7% (119/181) men and 34.3% (62/181) women, were recruited into the study and randomized to the intervention (n=93) or control group (n=88). The participants' mean age and BMI were 60.0 (SD 11.4) years and 30.4 (SD 5.3) kg/m2, respectively. We found no significant effect of the intervention (group by time interaction) on MVPA at either the 3-month (β=1.51, 95% CI -5.53 to 8.55) or the 6-month (β=-3.53, 95% CI -10.97 to 3.92) follow-up. We found no effect on any of the secondary outcomes at follow-ups, except for a significant effect on BMI at 6 months (β=0.52, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.84). However, mean BMI did not differ between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions: We found no evidence that persons with type 2 diabetes being randomized to use an app promoting daily walking increased their levels of MVPA at 3 or 6 months' follow-up compared with controls receiving standard care. The effect of the app on BMI was unclear, and we found nothing to support an effect on secondary outcomes. Further research is needed to determine what type of mHealth intervention could be effective to increase physical activity among persons with type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03053336; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03053336.

智能手机应用程序对促进 2 型糖尿病患者体育锻炼的效果:随机对照试验
背景:众所周知,体育锻炼对 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和减少心血管疾病的风险因素有好处。然而,在初级保健中成功实施以体育锻炼为目标的生活方式干预却很困难。智能手机应用程序可为支持体育锻炼提供有用的工具。DiaCert 应用程序是专为整合到初级保健中而设计的,是一种促进日常步行的自动化移动医疗(mHealth)解决方案:本研究旨在调查通过使用 DiaCert 应用程序对瑞典 2 型糖尿病患者进行为期 3 个月的体育锻炼干预的效果。我们的首要目标是评估随访 3 个月后中度到剧烈运动 (MVPA) 的效果。我们的次要目标是评估随访 6 个月时 MVPA 的效果,以及随访 3 个月和 6 个月时 BMI、腰围、血红蛋白 A1c、血脂和血压的效果:我们从 5 个初级保健中心和 1 个专科中心招募了男性和女性 2 型糖尿病患者。参与者按 1:1 随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组接受标准护理,并在基线和 3 个月后使用 DiaCert 应用程序。对照组只接受标准护理。在基线和随访期间对使用加速度计客观测量的体力活动、体重指数、腰围、生物标志物和血压结果进行评估。采用线性混合模型评估组间结果的差异:研究共招募了 181 名参与者,其中男性占 65.7%(119/181),女性占 34.3%(62/181),他们被随机分配到干预组(93 人)或对照组(88 人)。参与者的平均年龄和体重指数分别为 60.0 (SD 11.4) 岁和 30.4 (SD 5.3) kg/m2。我们发现,在 3 个月(β=1.51,95% CI -5.53-8.55)或 6 个月(β=-3.53,95% CI -10.97-3.92)的随访中,干预(组与时间的交互作用)对 MVPA 均无明显影响。我们发现,除了 6 个月时对体重指数(BMI)有显著影响(β=0.52,95% CI 0.20 至 0.84)外,随访时对任何次要结果都没有影响。然而,在 6 个月的随访中,两组的平均体重指数并无差异:我们没有发现证据表明,与接受标准护理的对照组相比,随机使用促进每日步行的应用程序的 2 型糖尿病患者在 3 个月或 6 个月的随访中增加了 MVPA 水平。应用程序对体重指数的影响尚不明确,我们也没有发现对次要结果的影响。要确定哪种类型的移动医疗干预能有效增加 2 型糖尿病患者的体力活动,还需要进一步的研究:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03053336; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03053336.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信