{"title":"Painful differences between different pain scale assessments: The outcome of assessed pain is a matter of the choices of scale and statistics.","authors":"Elisabeth Svensson, Iréne Lund","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Perceived pain is a multi-factorial subjective variable, commonly measured by numeric rating scales, verbal descriptive scales (VDS), or by a position on an analogue line (VAS). A major question is whether an individual's VAS and VDS pain assessments, on the same occasion, could be comparable. The aim was to compare continuous and discretized VAS pain data with verbal descriptive pain datasets from the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) in paired pain datasets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The measurement level of data from any type of scale assessments is ordinal, having rank-invariant properties only. Non-parametric statistical methods were used. Two ways of discretizing the VAS-line to VAS-intervals to fit the number of the comparing VDS-categories were used: the commonly used (equidistant VAS,VDS)-pairs and the (unbiased VAS,VDS)-pairs of pain data. The comparability of the (VAS,VDS)-pairs of data of perceived pain was studied by the bivariate ranking approach. Hence, each pair will be regarded as ordered, disordered, or tied with respect to the other pairs of data. The percentage agreement, PA, the measures of disorder, <i>D</i>, and of order consistency, MA, were calculated. Total interchangeability requires PA = 1 and MA = 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wide range of overlapping of (VAS,VDS)-pairs indicated that the continuous VAS data were not comparable to any of the VDS pain datasets. The percentage of agreement, PA; in the (equidistant VAS,ODI) and (equidistant VAS, EQ-5D) pairs were 38 and 49%, and the order consistency, MA, was 0.70 and 0.80, respectively. Corresponding results for the (unbiased VAS,VDS)-pairs of pain data were PA: 54 and 100%, and MA: 0.77 and 1.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results confirmed that perceived pain is the individual's subjective experience, and possible scale-interchangeability is only study-specific. The pain experience is not possible to be measured univocally, but is possible for the individual to rate on a scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Perceived pain is a multi-factorial subjective variable, commonly measured by numeric rating scales, verbal descriptive scales (VDS), or by a position on an analogue line (VAS). A major question is whether an individual's VAS and VDS pain assessments, on the same occasion, could be comparable. The aim was to compare continuous and discretized VAS pain data with verbal descriptive pain datasets from the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) in paired pain datasets.
Methods: The measurement level of data from any type of scale assessments is ordinal, having rank-invariant properties only. Non-parametric statistical methods were used. Two ways of discretizing the VAS-line to VAS-intervals to fit the number of the comparing VDS-categories were used: the commonly used (equidistant VAS,VDS)-pairs and the (unbiased VAS,VDS)-pairs of pain data. The comparability of the (VAS,VDS)-pairs of data of perceived pain was studied by the bivariate ranking approach. Hence, each pair will be regarded as ordered, disordered, or tied with respect to the other pairs of data. The percentage agreement, PA, the measures of disorder, D, and of order consistency, MA, were calculated. Total interchangeability requires PA = 1 and MA = 1.
Results: The wide range of overlapping of (VAS,VDS)-pairs indicated that the continuous VAS data were not comparable to any of the VDS pain datasets. The percentage of agreement, PA; in the (equidistant VAS,ODI) and (equidistant VAS, EQ-5D) pairs were 38 and 49%, and the order consistency, MA, was 0.70 and 0.80, respectively. Corresponding results for the (unbiased VAS,VDS)-pairs of pain data were PA: 54 and 100%, and MA: 0.77 and 1.0.
Conclusion: Our results confirmed that perceived pain is the individual's subjective experience, and possible scale-interchangeability is only study-specific. The pain experience is not possible to be measured univocally, but is possible for the individual to rate on a scale.
目的:知觉疼痛是一个多因素主观变量,通常通过数字评分量表、口头描述量表(VDS)或模拟线(VAS)上的位置来测量。一个主要问题是,在同一场合,个人的 VAS 和 VDS 疼痛评估是否具有可比性。我们的目的是将连续和离散的 VAS 疼痛数据与来自奥斯韦特里残疾指数(Oswestry Disability Index,ODI)和欧洲生活质量量表(EQ-5D)的口头描述性疼痛数据集在配对疼痛数据集中进行比较:方法:任何量表评估数据的测量水平都是序数,只具有秩变异特性。使用了非参数统计方法。使用两种方法将 VAS 线离散为 VAS 间隔,以适应比较 VDS 类别的数量:常用的(等距 VAS、VDS)对和(无偏 VAS、VDS)对疼痛数据。通过双变量排序法研究了(VAS,VDS)疼痛感数据对的可比性。因此,相对于其他数据对,每对数据将被视为有序、无序或并列。我们计算了一致性百分比 PA、无序度 D 和顺序一致性 MA。完全互换性要求 PA = 1 和 MA = 1:结果:(VAS,VDS)对的重叠范围很大,表明连续 VAS 数据与任何 VDS 疼痛数据集都不具有可比性。等距 VAS、ODI)对和(等距 VAS、EQ-5D)对的一致性百分比 PA 分别为 38% 和 49%,顺序一致性 MA 分别为 0.70 和 0.80。疼痛数据(无偏 VAS、VDS)对的相应结果为 PA:54 和 100%,MA:0.77 和 1.0:我们的研究结果证实,感知疼痛是个人的主观体验,可能的量表互换性只是研究的特异性。疼痛体验不可能被统一测量,但个人可以通过量表进行评分。