A Pilot Study of the Coping Together Virtual Family Intervention: Exploring Changes in Family Functioning and Individual Well-Being.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Savannah L Johnson, Amber D Rieder, Justin M Rasmussen, Mahgul Mansoor, Kaitlin N Quick, Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell, Wanda J Boone, Eve S Puffer
{"title":"A Pilot Study of the Coping Together Virtual Family Intervention: Exploring Changes in Family Functioning and Individual Well-Being.","authors":"Savannah L Johnson, Amber D Rieder, Justin M Rasmussen, Mahgul Mansoor, Kaitlin N Quick, Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell, Wanda J Boone, Eve S Puffer","doi":"10.1007/s10802-024-01183-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this pilot study, we tested a virtual family strengthening and mental health promotion intervention, Coping Together (CT), during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored changes at the family and individual levels, as well as mechanisms of change. Participants included 18 families (24 caregivers, 24 youth) with children aged 7 to 18 years. Community health workers delivered the 8-session CT intervention using videoconferencing software. We used qualitative semi-structured interviews with 14 of the families to explore changes and mechanisms of change using a thematic content analysis approach. We also administered pre-post surveys with the 18 families to explore the direction of changes, using only descriptive statistics in this small sample. Qualitative findings supported positive changes across family and individual level outcomes including family functioning, relationship quality, and individual psychosocial well-being. Results also confirmed several hypothesized mechanisms of change with improved communication providing the foundation for increased hope and improved problem solving and coping. Pre-post survey results were mixed, showing positive, but very small, changes in family closeness, caregiver-child communication, and levels of hope; almost no change was observed on measures of caregiver and child mental health. Families reported few problems at baseline quantitatively despite qualitative descriptions of pre-intervention difficulties. Results provide preliminary support for benefits of CT with the most consistent improvements seen across family relationships. Findings were mixed related to individual-level mental health benefits. Results have implications for revising content on mental health coping strategies and suggest the need to revise the quantitative measurement strategy for this non-clinical sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01183-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this pilot study, we tested a virtual family strengthening and mental health promotion intervention, Coping Together (CT), during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored changes at the family and individual levels, as well as mechanisms of change. Participants included 18 families (24 caregivers, 24 youth) with children aged 7 to 18 years. Community health workers delivered the 8-session CT intervention using videoconferencing software. We used qualitative semi-structured interviews with 14 of the families to explore changes and mechanisms of change using a thematic content analysis approach. We also administered pre-post surveys with the 18 families to explore the direction of changes, using only descriptive statistics in this small sample. Qualitative findings supported positive changes across family and individual level outcomes including family functioning, relationship quality, and individual psychosocial well-being. Results also confirmed several hypothesized mechanisms of change with improved communication providing the foundation for increased hope and improved problem solving and coping. Pre-post survey results were mixed, showing positive, but very small, changes in family closeness, caregiver-child communication, and levels of hope; almost no change was observed on measures of caregiver and child mental health. Families reported few problems at baseline quantitatively despite qualitative descriptions of pre-intervention difficulties. Results provide preliminary support for benefits of CT with the most consistent improvements seen across family relationships. Findings were mixed related to individual-level mental health benefits. Results have implications for revising content on mental health coping strategies and suggest the need to revise the quantitative measurement strategy for this non-clinical sample.

共同应对》虚拟家庭干预试点研究:探索家庭功能和个人福祉的变化。
在这项试点研究中,我们在 COVID-19 大流行期间测试了一种名为 "共同应对"(CT)的虚拟家庭强化和心理健康促进干预措施。我们探讨了家庭和个人层面的变化以及变化的机制。参与者包括 18 个家庭(24 名照顾者和 24 名青少年),他们的孩子年龄在 7 到 18 岁之间。社区卫生工作者使用视频会议软件进行了为期 8 次的 CT 干预。我们对其中 14 个家庭进行了半结构化定性访谈,采用主题内容分析法探讨了变化和变化机制。我们还对 18 个家庭进行了事后调查,以探索变化的方向,在这一小样本中仅使用了描述性统计。定性研究结果支持家庭和个人层面的积极变化,包括家庭功能、关系质量和个人社会心理健康。结果还证实了几种假设的变化机制,即沟通的改善为希望的增加以及问题解决和应对能力的提高奠定了基础。事后调查的结果好坏参半,在家庭亲密程度、照顾者与孩子的沟通以及希望水平方面都有积极的变化,但变化非常小;在照顾者和孩子的心理健康方面几乎没有观察到变化。尽管定性描述了干预前的困难,但家庭报告的基线问题很少。结果初步证明了 CT 的益处,其中家庭关系的改善最为一致。关于个人层面的心理健康益处,结果不一。结果对修改心理健康应对策略的内容有一定的影响,并表明有必要对这一非临床样本的定量测量策略进行修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Psychology-Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信