Heterogeneity of outcome measures in depression trials and the relevance of the content of outcome measures to patients: a systematic review.

IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Christopher Veal, Anneka Tomlinson, Andrea Cipriani, Samuel Bulteau, Chantal Henry, Chlöé Müh, Suzanne Touboul, Nikki De Waal, Hana Levy-Soussan, Toshi A Furukawa, Eiko I Fried, Viet-Thi Tran, Astrid Chevance
{"title":"Heterogeneity of outcome measures in depression trials and the relevance of the content of outcome measures to patients: a systematic review.","authors":"Christopher Veal, Anneka Tomlinson, Andrea Cipriani, Samuel Bulteau, Chantal Henry, Chlöé Müh, Suzanne Touboul, Nikki De Waal, Hana Levy-Soussan, Toshi A Furukawa, Eiko I Fried, Viet-Thi Tran, Astrid Chevance","doi":"10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00438-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research waste occurs when randomised controlled trial (RCT) outcomes are heterogeneous or overlook domains that matter to patients (eg, relating to symptoms or functions). In this systematic review, we reviewed the outcome measures used in 450 RCTs of adult unipolar and bipolar depression registered between 2018 and 2022 and identified 388 different measures. 40% of the RCTs used the same measure (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD]). Patients and clinicians matched each item within the 25 most frequently used measures with 80 previously identified domains of depression that matter to patients. Seven (9%) domains were not covered by the 25 most frequently used outcome measures (eg, mental pain and irritability). The HAMD covered a maximum of 47 (59%) of the 80 domains that matter to patients. An interim solution to facilitate evidence synthesis before a core outcome set is developed would be to use the most common measures and choose complementary scales to optimise domain coverage. TRANSLATIONS: For the French and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00438-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research waste occurs when randomised controlled trial (RCT) outcomes are heterogeneous or overlook domains that matter to patients (eg, relating to symptoms or functions). In this systematic review, we reviewed the outcome measures used in 450 RCTs of adult unipolar and bipolar depression registered between 2018 and 2022 and identified 388 different measures. 40% of the RCTs used the same measure (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD]). Patients and clinicians matched each item within the 25 most frequently used measures with 80 previously identified domains of depression that matter to patients. Seven (9%) domains were not covered by the 25 most frequently used outcome measures (eg, mental pain and irritability). The HAMD covered a maximum of 47 (59%) of the 80 domains that matter to patients. An interim solution to facilitate evidence synthesis before a core outcome set is developed would be to use the most common measures and choose complementary scales to optimise domain coverage. TRANSLATIONS: For the French and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

抑郁症试验中结果测量的异质性以及结果测量内容与患者的相关性:系统综述。
当随机对照试验(RCT)结果不一致或忽略了对患者重要的领域(如与症状或功能相关)时,就会出现研究浪费。在这篇系统性综述中,我们回顾了2018年至2022年间登记的450项成人单相和双相抑郁症RCT中使用的结果测量方法,并确定了388种不同的测量方法。40%的RCT使用了相同的测量方法(汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表[HAMD])。患者和临床医生将 25 种最常用的测量方法中的每个项目与之前确定的 80 个与患者息息相关的抑郁领域相匹配。25种最常用的结果测量法未涵盖7个领域(9%)(如精神痛苦和易怒)。HAMD 最多涵盖了患者关注的 80 个领域中的 47 个(59%)。在制定核心结果集之前,促进证据综合的临时解决方案是使用最常用的测量方法并选择补充量表,以优化领域覆盖。翻译:摘要的法文和荷兰文译文见补充材料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Psychiatry
Lancet Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
58.30
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信