Data Linkages for Wildfire Exposures and Human Health Studies: A Scoping Review

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Geohealth Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1029/2023GH000991
J. Barkoski, E. Van Fleet, A. Liu, S. Ramsey, R. K. Kwok, A. K. Miller
{"title":"Data Linkages for Wildfire Exposures and Human Health Studies: A Scoping Review","authors":"J. Barkoski,&nbsp;E. Van Fleet,&nbsp;A. Liu,&nbsp;S. Ramsey,&nbsp;R. K. Kwok,&nbsp;A. K. Miller","doi":"10.1029/2023GH000991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wildfires are increasing in frequency and intensity, with significant consequences that impact human health. A scoping review was conducted to: (a) understand wildfire-related health effects, (b) identify and describe environmental exposure and health outcome data sources used to research the impacts of wildfire exposures on health, and (c) identify gaps and opportunities to leverage exposure and health data to advance research. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and a sample of 83 articles met inclusion criteria. A majority of studies focused on respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes. Hospital administrative data was the most common health data source, followed by government data sources and health surveys. Wildfire smoke, specifically fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), was the most common exposure measure and was predominantly estimated from monitoring networks and satellite data. Health data were not available in real-time, and they lacked spatial and temporal coverage to study health outcomes with longer latency periods. Exposure data were often available in real-time and provided better temporal and spatial coverage but did not capture the complex mixture of hazardous wildfire smoke pollutants nor exposures associated with non-air pathways such as soil, household dust, food, and water. This scoping review of the specific health and exposure data sources used to underpin these studies provides a framework for the research community to understand: (a) the use and value of various environmental and health data sources, and (b) the opportunities for improving data collection, integration, and accessibility to help inform our understanding of wildfires and other environmental exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000991","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildfires are increasing in frequency and intensity, with significant consequences that impact human health. A scoping review was conducted to: (a) understand wildfire-related health effects, (b) identify and describe environmental exposure and health outcome data sources used to research the impacts of wildfire exposures on health, and (c) identify gaps and opportunities to leverage exposure and health data to advance research. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and a sample of 83 articles met inclusion criteria. A majority of studies focused on respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes. Hospital administrative data was the most common health data source, followed by government data sources and health surveys. Wildfire smoke, specifically fine particulate matter (PM2.5), was the most common exposure measure and was predominantly estimated from monitoring networks and satellite data. Health data were not available in real-time, and they lacked spatial and temporal coverage to study health outcomes with longer latency periods. Exposure data were often available in real-time and provided better temporal and spatial coverage but did not capture the complex mixture of hazardous wildfire smoke pollutants nor exposures associated with non-air pathways such as soil, household dust, food, and water. This scoping review of the specific health and exposure data sources used to underpin these studies provides a framework for the research community to understand: (a) the use and value of various environmental and health data sources, and (b) the opportunities for improving data collection, integration, and accessibility to help inform our understanding of wildfires and other environmental exposures.

Abstract Image

野火暴露和人类健康研究的数据链接:范围审查
野火的发生频率和强度都在增加,对人类健康造成了重大影响。我们进行了一次范围界定审查,以(a) 了解与野火相关的健康影响,(b) 识别并描述用于研究野火暴露对健康影响的环境暴露和健康结果数据来源,以及 (c) 识别利用暴露和健康数据推进研究的差距和机会。在 PubMed 上进行了文献检索,有 83 篇文章符合纳入标准。大多数研究都集中在呼吸系统和心血管疾病的结果上。医院管理数据是最常见的健康数据来源,其次是政府数据来源和健康调查。野火烟雾,特别是细颗粒物(PM2.5),是最常见的暴露测量指标,主要通过监测网络和卫星数据进行估算。健康数据不是实时提供的,而且缺乏时空覆盖范围,无法研究潜伏期较长的健康结果。暴露数据通常可以实时获得,并提供更好的时间和空间覆盖范围,但无法捕捉危险野火烟雾污染物的复杂混合物,也无法捕捉与土壤、家庭灰尘、食物和水等非空气途径相关的暴露。对用于支持这些研究的特定健康和暴露数据源进行的范围审查为研究界提供了一个框架,以便了解:(a) 各种环境和健康数据源的使用情况和价值,以及 (b) 改进数据收集、整合和获取的机会,从而帮助我们了解野火和其他环境暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信