Recall characteristics and food safety process control

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Michael Ollinger
{"title":"Recall characteristics and food safety process control","authors":"Michael Ollinger","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) initiated 1,073 recalls of meat and poultry products that could cause severe illness or death over 2000–2019. These recalls led to substantial drops in demand that vary by the characteristics of the recall (<span>Zhou and Liu, 2023</span>) and incentivized firms to invest in food safety (<span>Ollinger and Houser, 2020</span>, <span>Ollinger and Bovay, 2020</span>). Following <span>Zhou and Liu (2023)</span> and <span>Ollinger and Houser, 2020</span>, <span>Ollinger and Bovay, 2020</span>, this paper examines differences in food safety process control for establishments with different recall characteristics and contrasts that performance with establishments without recalls. Results show that (1) Salmonella share relative to an establishment’s own mean Salmonella share outperforms Salmonella share alone in estimating the likelihood of a recall, (2) 27 percent rather than 12 percent of establishments would have failed to meet the Salmonella standard if a proposed but not yet mandated more stringent standard had been in effect, and (3) most establishments return to normal operating conditions after a recall, but establishments with multiple recalls struggle to regain control of food safety, suggesting they may benefit from an audit of their food safety systems by FSIS or an auditor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102618"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000290","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) initiated 1,073 recalls of meat and poultry products that could cause severe illness or death over 2000–2019. These recalls led to substantial drops in demand that vary by the characteristics of the recall (Zhou and Liu, 2023) and incentivized firms to invest in food safety (Ollinger and Houser, 2020, Ollinger and Bovay, 2020). Following Zhou and Liu (2023) and Ollinger and Houser, 2020, Ollinger and Bovay, 2020, this paper examines differences in food safety process control for establishments with different recall characteristics and contrasts that performance with establishments without recalls. Results show that (1) Salmonella share relative to an establishment’s own mean Salmonella share outperforms Salmonella share alone in estimating the likelihood of a recall, (2) 27 percent rather than 12 percent of establishments would have failed to meet the Salmonella standard if a proposed but not yet mandated more stringent standard had been in effect, and (3) most establishments return to normal operating conditions after a recall, but establishments with multiple recalls struggle to regain control of food safety, suggesting they may benefit from an audit of their food safety systems by FSIS or an auditor.

召回特点和食品安全过程控制
食品安全检验局(FSIS)在 2000-2019 年间对可能导致严重疾病或死亡的肉类和家禽产品实施了 1,073 次召回。这些召回导致需求大幅下降,而需求的下降因召回的特点而异(Zhou 和 Liu,2023 年),并激励企业投资于食品安全(Ollinger 和 Houser,2020 年;Ollinger 和 Bovay,2020 年)。继 Zhou 和 Liu(2023 年)、Ollinger 和 Houser,2020 年、Ollinger 和 Bovay,2020 年之后,本文研究了具有不同召回特征的企业在食品安全流程控制方面的差异,并将其表现与未召回的企业进行对比。结果表明:(1) 在估计召回的可能性方面,沙门氏菌比例相对于企业自身的平均沙门氏菌比例要优于单纯的沙门氏菌比例;(2) 如果建议但尚未强制实施的更严格标准生效,27%而不是 12%的企业会不符合沙门氏菌标准、(3) 大多数企业在召回后会恢复到正常的经营状态,但多次召回的企业很难重新控制食品安全,这表明它们可能会受益于食品安全局或审计员对其食品安全系统的审计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信