Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Use of Local Anaesthetics Among Non-Anaesthesia Healthcare Professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-03-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S428661
Intisar Ahmed Abdi, John Mark Kasumba, Agnes Wabule, Mary T Nabukenya, Joseph Kayongo, Bernadette Kyoheirwe, Abdirizak Abdullahi Sheikdon, Kamaludin D Osman
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Use of Local Anaesthetics Among Non-Anaesthesia Healthcare Professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital.","authors":"Intisar Ahmed Abdi, John Mark Kasumba, Agnes Wabule, Mary T Nabukenya, Joseph Kayongo, Bernadette Kyoheirwe, Abdirizak Abdullahi Sheikdon, Kamaludin D Osman","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S428661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Local anaesthetics (LA) are commonly used in dental and surgical emergency wards by both anaesthesia professionals and non-anaesthesia professionals. Anecdotal evidence shows that non-anaesthesia health-care professionals do not monitor vital signs during the use of local anaesthesia, and there are no standard hospital guidelines on the use of LA and management of LA toxicity by non-anaesthesia professionals.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding local anaesthetic use among non-anaesthesia health-care professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study that utilized a quantitative research approach. The sample size of the study was 43 non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals from the casualty and surgical outpatient wards and Mulago dental ward. Data was collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using STATA 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 66.67% of the Specialist, 76.47% of the senior house officers, 100% of medical officers, and 80% of the clinical orthopedic house officers had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge in Mulago casualty and surgical outpatient wards. 20% of the specialist and 16.67% of the senior house officers had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge in Mulago dental ward. 87.5% of the non-anaesthesia health-care professionals do not give a test dose on a routine basis in Mulago casualty and surgical outpatient wards. A total of 63.64% of the non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals in Mulago dental ward do not sterilize the site of injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-anaesthesia health-care professionals had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge, somewhat good practices, and negative attitudes toward LA use.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"17 ","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10929551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S428661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Local anaesthetics (LA) are commonly used in dental and surgical emergency wards by both anaesthesia professionals and non-anaesthesia professionals. Anecdotal evidence shows that non-anaesthesia health-care professionals do not monitor vital signs during the use of local anaesthesia, and there are no standard hospital guidelines on the use of LA and management of LA toxicity by non-anaesthesia professionals.

Purpose: This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding local anaesthetic use among non-anaesthesia health-care professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital.

Patients and methods: This was a cross-sectional study that utilized a quantitative research approach. The sample size of the study was 43 non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals from the casualty and surgical outpatient wards and Mulago dental ward. Data was collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using STATA 15.

Results: Overall, 66.67% of the Specialist, 76.47% of the senior house officers, 100% of medical officers, and 80% of the clinical orthopedic house officers had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge in Mulago casualty and surgical outpatient wards. 20% of the specialist and 16.67% of the senior house officers had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge in Mulago dental ward. 87.5% of the non-anaesthesia health-care professionals do not give a test dose on a routine basis in Mulago casualty and surgical outpatient wards. A total of 63.64% of the non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals in Mulago dental ward do not sterilize the site of injection.

Conclusion: Non-anaesthesia health-care professionals had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge, somewhat good practices, and negative attitudes toward LA use.

穆拉戈国家转诊医院非麻醉专业医护人员对局部麻醉剂使用的认识、态度和实践。
简介:局部麻醉剂(LA)通常被麻醉专业人员和非麻醉专业人员用于牙科和外科急诊病房。轶事证据显示,非麻醉专业医护人员在使用局麻药期间不会对生命体征进行监测,而且医院也没有关于非麻醉专业人员使用局麻药和处理局麻药中毒的标准指南:这是一项采用定量研究方法的横断面研究。研究样本量为43名非麻醉专业医护人员,分别来自伤科、外科门诊病房和穆拉戈牙科病房。研究采用问卷调查的方式收集数据,并使用 STATA 15 进行分析:总体而言,在 Mulago 伤科和外科门诊病房,66.67% 的专科医生、76.47% 的高级住院医师、100% 的医务人员和 80% 的临床骨科住院医师的知识水平不尽人意。20% 的专科医师和 16.67% 的高级内科医师对 Mulago 牙科病房的知识水平不满意。在穆拉戈急诊室和外科门诊病房,87.5%的非麻醉专业医护人员没有进行常规剂量测试。穆拉戈牙科病房共有63.64%的非麻醉医护人员没有对注射部位进行消毒:结论:非麻醉医护人员对LA使用的知识水平、良好实践和消极态度均不令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信