Gender classification of Korean personal names: Deep neural networks versus human judgments

IF 1.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Hyesun Cho
{"title":"Gender classification of Korean personal names: Deep neural networks versus human judgments","authors":"Hyesun Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In many languages, female and male names have different phonotactic characteristics. The name–gender relationship is probabilistic; therefore, it can be captured more adequately using stochastic models than deterministic phonological theories. In this study, a total of 6,000 most commonly used names (3,000 for each gender) in Korean were used to train a deep neural network (DNN), which is an ensemble model of recurrent neural networks and convolution neural networks. The phonotactic learner (PL) was used as the baseline model. The DNN and PL models predicted the gender of 50 test names compiled from low-frequency names. The models’ predictions were compared with human judgments on the gender of the test names. The models’ predicted labels matched the names’ actual labels, with a higher accuracy in the DNN (90%) than in the PL (76%). The predictions also matched the labels assigned by human subjects with a higher accuracy for the DNN (86%) than the PL (72%). The DNN model correlated more closely with human judgments (<em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.743) than the PL (<em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.312). Considering the similarity of responses between the DNN and humans, these results suggest that neural network models should be incorporated into phonological studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384124000329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many languages, female and male names have different phonotactic characteristics. The name–gender relationship is probabilistic; therefore, it can be captured more adequately using stochastic models than deterministic phonological theories. In this study, a total of 6,000 most commonly used names (3,000 for each gender) in Korean were used to train a deep neural network (DNN), which is an ensemble model of recurrent neural networks and convolution neural networks. The phonotactic learner (PL) was used as the baseline model. The DNN and PL models predicted the gender of 50 test names compiled from low-frequency names. The models’ predictions were compared with human judgments on the gender of the test names. The models’ predicted labels matched the names’ actual labels, with a higher accuracy in the DNN (90%) than in the PL (76%). The predictions also matched the labels assigned by human subjects with a higher accuracy for the DNN (86%) than the PL (72%). The DNN model correlated more closely with human judgments (r2 = 0.743) than the PL (r2 = 0.312). Considering the similarity of responses between the DNN and humans, these results suggest that neural network models should be incorporated into phonological studies.

韩国人名的性别分类:深度神经网络与人类判断
在许多语言中,女性和男性的名字具有不同的语音特征。姓名与性别之间的关系是概率性的,因此,使用随机模型比使用确定性语音理论能更充分地捕捉到这种关系。在本研究中,共使用了 6000 个最常用的韩语姓名(男女各 3000 个)来训练深度神经网络(DNN),该网络是递归神经网络和卷积神经网络的集合模型。发音学习器(PL)被用作基线模型。DNN 和 PL 模型预测了 50 个由低频名称组成的测试名称的性别。模型的预测结果与人类对测试名称性别的判断进行了比较。模型预测的标签与姓名的实际标签相吻合,其中 DNN 的准确率(90%)高于 PL 的准确率(76%)。预测结果也与人类受试者分配的标签相吻合,DNN 的准确率(86%)高于 PL 的准确率(72%)。DNN 模型与人类判断的相关性(r2 = 0.743)高于 PL 模型(r2 = 0.312)。考虑到 DNN 与人类反应的相似性,这些结果表明神经网络模型应被纳入语音研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lingua
Lingua Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信