{"title":"Development of an Index for a Tooth to Receive a Full-Coverage Crown.","authors":"Amit Porwal, Anurag Satpathy","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a system for assessment of the status of a tooth to receive a full coverage crown and depict it on a measurable scale, and to validate its use by assessing examiner reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The index was developed based on the inputs from experts in the field with a consensus on factors (4 periodontal, 2 endodontic, and 4 prosthodontic), stages of severity (stage 1 to stage 4), assigned scores, and relative weights pertaining to varied clinical scenarios. Based on the selection of factor-stage combination, an overall tooth crownability index (TCI) score along with three-factor scores were computed. The validation study included clinical and radiological assessment of cases based on the index criteria by four independent examiners (periodontist, prosthodontist, endodontist, and general practitioner).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty teeth were assessed. The distribution of repeated selection by the examiners was quite identical to the initial (kappa = 0.93). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of examiners in TCI and factorial scores. An excellent agreement between the measurements was observed among the examiners (ICC =0.993; Crohnbach α = 0.993).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A tooth crownability index has been developed for a tooth to receive a full coverage crown which has an excellent agreement and good reproducibility among the examiners. TCI will serve as a baseline tool in treatment plan decision-making based on the status of the teeth and in research for evaluating the efficacy of various treatment options available (standard criteria for outcome assessment).</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a system for assessment of the status of a tooth to receive a full coverage crown and depict it on a measurable scale, and to validate its use by assessing examiner reproducibility.
Methods: The index was developed based on the inputs from experts in the field with a consensus on factors (4 periodontal, 2 endodontic, and 4 prosthodontic), stages of severity (stage 1 to stage 4), assigned scores, and relative weights pertaining to varied clinical scenarios. Based on the selection of factor-stage combination, an overall tooth crownability index (TCI) score along with three-factor scores were computed. The validation study included clinical and radiological assessment of cases based on the index criteria by four independent examiners (periodontist, prosthodontist, endodontist, and general practitioner).
Results: Forty teeth were assessed. The distribution of repeated selection by the examiners was quite identical to the initial (kappa = 0.93). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of examiners in TCI and factorial scores. An excellent agreement between the measurements was observed among the examiners (ICC =0.993; Crohnbach α = 0.993).
Conclusions: A tooth crownability index has been developed for a tooth to receive a full coverage crown which has an excellent agreement and good reproducibility among the examiners. TCI will serve as a baseline tool in treatment plan decision-making based on the status of the teeth and in research for evaluating the efficacy of various treatment options available (standard criteria for outcome assessment).