Appropriateness of Use of Streptococcal Pharyngitis Testing and Associated Antibiotic Prescribing in the Urgent Care Setting.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Clinical Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1177/00099228241237908
Michael A Haynes, M'hamed Temkit, Igor Kushner, Diane E Hindman
{"title":"Appropriateness of Use of Streptococcal Pharyngitis Testing and Associated Antibiotic Prescribing in the Urgent Care Setting.","authors":"Michael A Haynes, M'hamed Temkit, Igor Kushner, Diane E Hindman","doi":"10.1177/00099228241237908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary objective was to evaluate Group A streptococcal (GAS) tests performed with a Modified Centor Criteria (MCC) Score < 3 at Urgent Care Clinics (UCC). Secondary objectives included evaluating the MCC sensitivity and specificity, antibiotics prescribed with an MCC score < 3, and association between palatal petechiae and GAS pharyngitis infections. This was a retrospective review from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests (RADTs) on patients with ICD codes associated with pharyngitis. Fifteen hundred patient charts were reviewed. The majority of MCC scores were < 3 at 60.0% (878/1464). Sensitivity of GAS testing (RADT/culture) slightly increased for MCC scores ≥ 3 and was better than the specificity of those scores. In comparison, MCC scores < 3, showed better specificity compared to sensitivity. Over 50% of RADTs performed were inappropriate per clinical guidelines. MCC score < 3 had higher rates of negative test results.</p>","PeriodicalId":10363,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1691-1697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228241237908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective was to evaluate Group A streptococcal (GAS) tests performed with a Modified Centor Criteria (MCC) Score < 3 at Urgent Care Clinics (UCC). Secondary objectives included evaluating the MCC sensitivity and specificity, antibiotics prescribed with an MCC score < 3, and association between palatal petechiae and GAS pharyngitis infections. This was a retrospective review from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests (RADTs) on patients with ICD codes associated with pharyngitis. Fifteen hundred patient charts were reviewed. The majority of MCC scores were < 3 at 60.0% (878/1464). Sensitivity of GAS testing (RADT/culture) slightly increased for MCC scores ≥ 3 and was better than the specificity of those scores. In comparison, MCC scores < 3, showed better specificity compared to sensitivity. Over 50% of RADTs performed were inappropriate per clinical guidelines. MCC score < 3 had higher rates of negative test results.

在急诊护理环境中使用链球菌咽炎检测及相关抗生素处方的适宜性。
首要目标是评估在急诊诊所(UCC)进行的甲组链球菌(GAS)检测中,改良森托标准(MCC)评分小于 3 分的情况。次要目标包括评估 MCC 的灵敏度和特异性、MCC 评分小于 3 分的抗生素处方以及腭部瘀斑与 GAS 咽炎感染之间的关联。这是一项从2018年7月1日至2019年6月30日的回顾性研究,研究对象是ICD代码与咽炎相关的患者的快速抗原检测试验(RADT)。共审查了 1500 份病历。大多数 MCC 评分小于 3,占 60.0%(878/1464)。当 MCC 评分≥3 时,GAS 检测(RADT/培养)的灵敏度会略有增加,并且优于这些评分的特异性。相比之下,MCC评分<3的特异性要好于敏感性。根据临床指南,50% 以上的 RADT 是不适当的。MCC 评分 < 3 的阴性检测结果率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Pediatrics
Clinical Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pediatrics (CLP) a peer-reviewed monthly journal, is a must read for the busy pediatrician. CLP contains state-of-the-art, accurate, concise and down-to earth information on practical, everyday child care topics whether they are clinical, scientific, behavioral, educational, or ethical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信