Selection of speech processor in cochlear implant patients: experience in a tertiary hospital.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2024.2318762
Sung-Min Park, Yejun Chun, Byung Yoon Choi
{"title":"Selection of speech processor in cochlear implant patients: experience in a tertiary hospital.","authors":"Sung-Min Park, Yejun Chun, Byung Yoon Choi","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2318762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are two types of speech processors used in CI devices: behind-the-ear (BTE) and off-the-ear (OTE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients and revision cases in relation to the type of speech processors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 452 ears that underwent CI was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with severe inner ear anomalies (91.7%) more frequently preferred BTE speech processors than those without severe inner ear anomalies (<i>p</i> = .000). The magnet strength used in OTE speech processor users was significantly higher than in BTE speech processor users (<i>p</i> = .002). In cochlear implantees who underwent surgery before 12 months of age, the magnet strength in the revision group was greater than in the non-revision group (<i>p</i> = .025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when choosing the type of speech processor and modifying the magnet strength of the implant device. The choice between BTE and OTE speech processors led to different required magnet strengths, contributing to the occurrence of skin flap inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2318762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are two types of speech processors used in CI devices: behind-the-ear (BTE) and off-the-ear (OTE).

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients and revision cases in relation to the type of speech processors.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 452 ears that underwent CI was performed.

Results: Children with severe inner ear anomalies (91.7%) more frequently preferred BTE speech processors than those without severe inner ear anomalies (p = .000). The magnet strength used in OTE speech processor users was significantly higher than in BTE speech processor users (p = .002). In cochlear implantees who underwent surgery before 12 months of age, the magnet strength in the revision group was greater than in the non-revision group (p = .025).

Conclusions and significance: Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when choosing the type of speech processor and modifying the magnet strength of the implant device. The choice between BTE and OTE speech processors led to different required magnet strengths, contributing to the occurrence of skin flap inflammation.

人工耳蜗植入患者语音处理器的选择:一家三级医院的经验。
背景:用于 CI 设备的语音处理器有两种类型:耳后式(BTE)和耳外式(OTE):本研究旨在调查患者和翻修病例的特征与语音处理器类型的关系:对接受过 CI 的 452 只耳朵进行了回顾性研究:结果:与无严重内耳异常的儿童相比,有严重内耳异常的儿童(91.7%)更倾向于使用 BTE 语音处理器(p = .000)。OTE 语音处理器使用者使用的磁铁强度明显高于 BTE 语音处理器使用者(p = .002)。在 12 个月前接受手术的人工耳蜗植入者中,翻修组的磁铁强度高于非翻修组(p = .025):总之,我们的研究结果表明,在选择语音处理器类型和修改植入设备的磁力强度时应考虑一些因素。选择 BTE 和 OTE 语音处理器会导致所需的磁强不同,从而导致皮瓣炎症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信