The impact of water rights trading on water resource use efficiency: Evidence from China's water rights trading pilots

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ruiwen Yan , Nan Zhao , Yongyu Wang , Xiaojie Liu
{"title":"The impact of water rights trading on water resource use efficiency: Evidence from China's water rights trading pilots","authors":"Ruiwen Yan ,&nbsp;Nan Zhao ,&nbsp;Yongyu Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaojie Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.wre.2024.100241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the increasing conflict between the supply and demand of water resources, enhancing water resource use efficiency has gradually become a focus of attention. As a new way to manage water resources, water rights trading pilots have been implemented in China. It is important to explore the impact of water rights trading on regional water resource use efficiency and possible impact paths. This paper employs a global nonradial directional distance function (GNDDF) model to measure water resource use efficiency, which is more accurate and reliable. To discern the effect of China's water rights trading pilot policy on enhancing regional water resource use efficiency, we apply the regression control method (RCM) for counterfactual analysis and test the possible pathways through which the water rights trading policy affects water resource use efficiency. This article draws the following conclusions. (i) China's overall water resource use efficiency has not reached a high level over the past decade, and water resource use efficiency has exhibited substantial regional disparities. (ii) There is some evidence to suggest that the water rights trading policy may have a positive impact on improving water resource use efficiency in the pilot provinces. However, the improvement effect exhibits regional variations, which are likely attributed to the initial water resource use levels in the pilot provinces and the specific implementation modes of water rights trading. (iii) Water rights trading policies can enhance water resource use efficiency through two pathways, including facilitating reclaimed water reuse and promoting water use restructuring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48644,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Economics","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428424000057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing conflict between the supply and demand of water resources, enhancing water resource use efficiency has gradually become a focus of attention. As a new way to manage water resources, water rights trading pilots have been implemented in China. It is important to explore the impact of water rights trading on regional water resource use efficiency and possible impact paths. This paper employs a global nonradial directional distance function (GNDDF) model to measure water resource use efficiency, which is more accurate and reliable. To discern the effect of China's water rights trading pilot policy on enhancing regional water resource use efficiency, we apply the regression control method (RCM) for counterfactual analysis and test the possible pathways through which the water rights trading policy affects water resource use efficiency. This article draws the following conclusions. (i) China's overall water resource use efficiency has not reached a high level over the past decade, and water resource use efficiency has exhibited substantial regional disparities. (ii) There is some evidence to suggest that the water rights trading policy may have a positive impact on improving water resource use efficiency in the pilot provinces. However, the improvement effect exhibits regional variations, which are likely attributed to the initial water resource use levels in the pilot provinces and the specific implementation modes of water rights trading. (iii) Water rights trading policies can enhance water resource use efficiency through two pathways, including facilitating reclaimed water reuse and promoting water use restructuring.

Abstract Image

水权交易对水资源利用效率的影响:来自中国水权交易试点的证据
随着水资源供需矛盾的日益突出,提高水资源利用效率逐渐成为人们关注的焦点。作为一种新的水资源管理方式,水权交易试点已在中国开展。探讨水权交易对区域水资源利用效率的影响及可能的影响路径具有重要意义。本文采用全球非径向距离函数(GNDDF)模型来衡量水资源利用效率,该模型更加准确可靠。为探讨中国水权交易试点政策对提高区域水资源利用效率的影响,我们运用回归控制法(RCM)进行了反事实分析,检验了水权交易政策影响水资源利用效率的可能路径。本文得出以下结论。(i) 近十年来,中国水资源利用效率总体上没有达到较高水平,水资源利用效率呈现出较 大的地区差异。(ii) 有证据表明,水权交易政策对试点省份水资源利用效率的提高有积极作用。然而,改善效果表现出地区差异,这可能与试点省份最初的水资源利用水平和水权交易的具体实施模式有关。(iii) 水权交易政策可以通过促进再生水回用和推动用水结构调整两个途径提高水资 源利用效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources and Economics
Water Resources and Economics Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Water Resources and Economics is one of a series of specialist titles launched by the highly-regarded Water Research. For the purpose of sustainable water resources management, understanding the multiple connections and feedback mechanisms between water resources and the economy is crucial. Water Resources and Economics addresses the financial and economic dimensions associated with water resources use and governance, across different economic sectors like agriculture, energy, industry, shipping, recreation and urban and rural water supply, at local, regional and transboundary scale. Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to) the economics of: Aquatic ecosystem services- Blue economy- Climate change and flood risk management- Climate smart agriculture- Coastal management- Droughts and water scarcity- Environmental flows- Eutrophication- Food, water, energy nexus- Groundwater management- Hydropower generation- Hydrological risks and uncertainties- Marine resources- Nature-based solutions- Resource recovery- River restoration- Storm water harvesting- Transboundary water allocation- Urban water management- Wastewater treatment- Watershed management- Water health risks- Water pollution- Water quality management- Water security- Water stress- Water technology innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信