Total Replacement of Soybean Meal with Sundried Soymilk Residue in the Total Mixed Ration has a Negative Impact on Intake, Digestibility, and Milk Production in Dairy Goats

IF 1.9 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Thaintip Kraiprom, S. Jantarat, Suphawadee Yaemkong, Narakamol Laorodphan, Nithat Wichasit, Muhammad Khan, John Mauck, Juan J. Loor, T. Incharoen
{"title":"Total Replacement of Soybean Meal with Sundried Soymilk Residue in the Total Mixed Ration has a Negative Impact on Intake, Digestibility, and Milk Production in Dairy Goats","authors":"Thaintip Kraiprom, S. Jantarat, Suphawadee Yaemkong, Narakamol Laorodphan, Nithat Wichasit, Muhammad Khan, John Mauck, Juan J. Loor, T. Incharoen","doi":"10.1155/2024/7441866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate whether total replacement of soybean meal (SBM) with sundried soymilk residue (SSR) in a total mixed ration (TMR) affects intake, digestibility, milk production, and blood metabolites in dairy goats. A total of 12 healthy Saanen dairy goats (40.12 ± 5.80 kg of BW) in midlactation (31.23 ± 10.12 days) were used in a randomized complete design (n = 4 goats/group). Dietary treatments were based on a TMR as follows: control TMR without SSR (CON) or SBM-based TMR with 50% or 100% of SSR replacing SBM (SSR-50 and SSR-100, respectively). All goats had ad libitum access to feed and clean water throughout the experiment. The dry matter (DM) intake decreased (p < 0.05) with the increasing replacement ratio of SBM and was lowest in the SSR-100 group. Similarly, organic matter (OM) digestibility was lowest (p < 0.05) in the SSR-100 group. However, the digestibility of DM, CP, NDF, and ADF did not change (p > 0.05) by dietary treatments. Compared with CON, the milk yield decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with increasing replacement ratio of SBM. In contrast, milk composition such as total solids, solids-not-fat, milk fat, lactose, protein, and pH were not influenced (p > 0.05) by feeding dietary SSR. Compared with other treatments, blood glucose concentration was lower (p < 0.05) in the SSR-100 group. In contrast, packed cell volume, glucose, and plasma urea nitrogen concentrations did not differ (p > 0.05). The results indicated that SSR could replace SBM in a TMR at less than 50%. Thus, the present study provides support for further investigation to enhance the utilization of soybean waste as an alternative protein source in the TMR for dairy goats and potentially other ruminants.","PeriodicalId":23503,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7441866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate whether total replacement of soybean meal (SBM) with sundried soymilk residue (SSR) in a total mixed ration (TMR) affects intake, digestibility, milk production, and blood metabolites in dairy goats. A total of 12 healthy Saanen dairy goats (40.12 ± 5.80 kg of BW) in midlactation (31.23 ± 10.12 days) were used in a randomized complete design (n = 4 goats/group). Dietary treatments were based on a TMR as follows: control TMR without SSR (CON) or SBM-based TMR with 50% or 100% of SSR replacing SBM (SSR-50 and SSR-100, respectively). All goats had ad libitum access to feed and clean water throughout the experiment. The dry matter (DM) intake decreased (p < 0.05) with the increasing replacement ratio of SBM and was lowest in the SSR-100 group. Similarly, organic matter (OM) digestibility was lowest (p < 0.05) in the SSR-100 group. However, the digestibility of DM, CP, NDF, and ADF did not change (p > 0.05) by dietary treatments. Compared with CON, the milk yield decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with increasing replacement ratio of SBM. In contrast, milk composition such as total solids, solids-not-fat, milk fat, lactose, protein, and pH were not influenced (p > 0.05) by feeding dietary SSR. Compared with other treatments, blood glucose concentration was lower (p < 0.05) in the SSR-100 group. In contrast, packed cell volume, glucose, and plasma urea nitrogen concentrations did not differ (p > 0.05). The results indicated that SSR could replace SBM in a TMR at less than 50%. Thus, the present study provides support for further investigation to enhance the utilization of soybean waste as an alternative protein source in the TMR for dairy goats and potentially other ruminants.
在全混合日粮中用干豆渣完全替代豆粕对奶山羊的摄入量、消化率和产奶量有负面影响
本研究旨在评估在全混合日粮(TMR)中用干豆渣(SSR)完全替代豆粕(SBM)是否会影响奶山羊的摄入量、消化率、产奶量和血液代谢物。采用随机完全设计法(n = 4 只/组),共饲养了 12 只处于泌乳中期(31.23 ± 10.12 天)的健康萨能奶山羊(体重 40.12 ± 5.80 千克)。日粮处理基于以下TMR:不含SSR的对照TMR(CON)或基于SBM的TMR,其中SSR取代SBM的比例分别为50%或100%(SSR-50和SSR-100)。在整个实验过程中,所有山羊都可以自由采食饲料和饮用干净的水。干物质(DM)摄入量随着 SBM 替代率的增加而减少(p < 0.05),SSR-100 组的干物质摄入量最低。同样,SSR-100 组的有机物(OM)消化率也最低(p < 0.05)。但是,日粮处理对 DM、CP、NDF 和 ADF 的消化率没有影响(p > 0.05)。与 CON 相比,随着 SBM 替代率的增加,产奶量显著下降(p < 0.05)。相比之下,日粮 SSR 不影响牛奶成分,如总固形物、固形物-非脂肪、乳脂肪、乳糖、蛋白质和 pH 值(p > 0.05)。与其他处理相比,SSR-100 组的血糖浓度较低(p < 0.05)。相比之下,包装细胞体积、葡萄糖和血浆尿素氮浓度没有差异(p > 0.05)。研究结果表明,SSR 可在 TMR 中替代 SBM 的比例低于 50%。因此,本研究支持进一步研究如何提高大豆废料的利用率,将其作为奶山羊和其他反刍动物TMR的替代蛋白质来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine International
Veterinary Medicine International Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles and review articles in all areas of veterinary research. The journal will consider articles on the biological basis of disease, as well as diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信