Conscientious Objection and Institutional Objection to Voluntary Assistance in Dying: An Ethico-legal Critique.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Ian Kerridge, Cameron Stewart, Jackie Leach Scully, Mary Chiarella, Julie Hamblin, Adam Johnson, Christopher Ryan, Linda Sheahan, George Skowronski
{"title":"Conscientious Objection and Institutional Objection to Voluntary Assistance in Dying: An Ethico-legal Critique.","authors":"Ian Kerridge, Cameron Stewart, Jackie Leach Scully, Mary Chiarella, Julie Hamblin, Adam Johnson, Christopher Ryan, Linda Sheahan, George Skowronski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This column examines conscientious objection and institutional objection in Australian voluntary assistance in dying. It reviews the current legislative regimes and then examines these practices from an ethical perspective, and raises particular concerns and suggestions with how conscientious objection and institutional objection should be operationalised.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 4","pages":"806-821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This column examines conscientious objection and institutional objection in Australian voluntary assistance in dying. It reviews the current legislative regimes and then examines these practices from an ethical perspective, and raises particular concerns and suggestions with how conscientious objection and institutional objection should be operationalised.

对临终自愿协助的良心反对和机构反对:伦理-法律批判》。
本专栏探讨了澳大利亚自愿临终关怀中的良心反对和机构反对。它回顾了当前的立法制度,然后从伦理学的角度对这些做法进行了研究,并就如何实施良心反对和机构反对提出了特别关注的问题和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信