Ruhsan Müdüroğlu Adigüzel, Abdelrahman Mustafa, Bahar Füsun Oduncuoğlu, Mer Ç Y Çolak, Ayşe Gülşahi, Nesl Han Arhun
{"title":"Effect of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation on shear bond strength of resin composite to enamel: An in vitro study.","authors":"Ruhsan Müdüroğlu Adigüzel, Abdelrahman Mustafa, Bahar Füsun Oduncuoğlu, Mer Ç Y Çolak, Ayşe Gülşahi, Nesl Han Arhun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess and compare the effects of sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation on shear bond strength (SBS) and investigate the influence of adhesive system application modes (etch&rinse/self-etch) on SBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this experimental study, 45 extracted sound human molars were selected. Mesial and distal surfaces of the teeth were abraded until 90 smooth enamel surfaces were obtained. Specimens were divided into two groups, with half (N= 45) conditioned in etch&rinse mode and the remaining (N= 45) in self-etch mode using Tetric N Bond Universal. Composite resin discs were produced on these surfaces by filling Teflon molds. All specimens were aged via thermocycling. Each group was further divided into three more groups (n= 15) according to the type of periodontal instrumentation (ultrasonic, sonic or none). SBS values were recorded and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Fracture sites were examined under a stereomicroscope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of periodontal instrumentation had no significant effect on SBS values, whether sonic, ultrasonic or their absence (P= 0.945). The type of adhesive system mode had a significant influence on the shear bond strength values. Etch&rinse groups had significantly higher shear bond strength values than self-etch groups (P< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study reassures practitioners that sonic and ultrasonic instruments are safe for enamel bonding and highlights the importance of selecting adhesive techniques for optimal restorative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 1","pages":"24-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess and compare the effects of sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation on shear bond strength (SBS) and investigate the influence of adhesive system application modes (etch&rinse/self-etch) on SBS.
Methods: In this experimental study, 45 extracted sound human molars were selected. Mesial and distal surfaces of the teeth were abraded until 90 smooth enamel surfaces were obtained. Specimens were divided into two groups, with half (N= 45) conditioned in etch&rinse mode and the remaining (N= 45) in self-etch mode using Tetric N Bond Universal. Composite resin discs were produced on these surfaces by filling Teflon molds. All specimens were aged via thermocycling. Each group was further divided into three more groups (n= 15) according to the type of periodontal instrumentation (ultrasonic, sonic or none). SBS values were recorded and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Fracture sites were examined under a stereomicroscope.
Results: The type of periodontal instrumentation had no significant effect on SBS values, whether sonic, ultrasonic or their absence (P= 0.945). The type of adhesive system mode had a significant influence on the shear bond strength values. Etch&rinse groups had significantly higher shear bond strength values than self-etch groups (P< 0.001).
Clinical significance: This study reassures practitioners that sonic and ultrasonic instruments are safe for enamel bonding and highlights the importance of selecting adhesive techniques for optimal restorative outcomes.
目的:评估和比较声波和超声波仪器对剪切粘接强度(SBS)的影响,并研究粘接系统应用模式(蚀刻冲洗/自酸蚀)对 SBS 的影响:在这项实验研究中,选取了 45 颗拔出的人类臼齿。方法:在这项实验研究中,选择了 45 颗拔出的健全人类臼齿,对牙齿的内侧和远端表面进行研磨,直至获得 90 个光滑的珐琅质表面。试样分为两组,一半(N= 45)采用蚀刻和冲洗模式,其余(N= 45)采用 Tetric N Bond Universal 自蚀刻模式。通过填充聚四氟乙烯模具在这些表面制作复合树脂盘。所有试样都经过热循环老化。根据牙周器械的类型(超声波、声波或无),每组又分为三组(n= 15)。记录 SBS 值并使用双向方差分析。在体视显微镜下观察骨折部位:结果:牙周器械的类型对 SBS 值无明显影响,无论是超声波、超声波还是无超声波(P= 0.945)。粘接系统模式的类型对剪切粘接强度值有显著影响。Etch&rinse 组的剪切粘接强度值明显高于自酸蚀组(P< 0.001):这项研究向从业人员保证了声波和超声波器械在釉质粘接中的安全性,并强调了选择粘接技术以获得最佳修复效果的重要性。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.