Translation, contextual adaptation, and reliability of the Danish Concept of Pain Inventory (COPI-Adult (DK)) - A self-reported outcome measure.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-03-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0092
Bettina Eiger, Christian L Straszek, Joshua W Pate, Michael Skovdal Rathleff
{"title":"Translation, contextual adaptation, and reliability of the Danish Concept of Pain Inventory (COPI-Adult (DK)) - A self-reported outcome measure.","authors":"Bettina Eiger, Christian L Straszek, Joshua W Pate, Michael Skovdal Rathleff","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pain is a growing concern globally, and an individual and societal burden. Pain science education (PSE) is a promising avenue for managing chronic pain, but targeted PSE is needed. The Concept of Pain Inventory for Adults (COPI-Adult) is a newly developed self-reported outcome measure aimed at targeting PSE. It is currently unavailable in Danish and has unknown reliability. The aims of this study were (1) to translate and contextually adapt to Danish and (2) to determine reliability in terms of test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and measurement error.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Step (1) was as follows: a dual panel approach was used to translate, contextually adapt into a Danish version. Step (2) was follows: a heterogenic sample of Danish adults >18 years (<i>n</i> = 150) was included in the test-retest analysis, test interval between 7 and 14 days, both answered via REDCap-link. Based on COSMIN recommendations, the following reliabilities were estimated: the test-retest using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>2.1</sub>) and internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha level. Measurement error in terms of standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Step (1) was as follows: the first panel reached 100% consensus on the wording of the COPI-Adult (DK), with no alterations by the second panel. Step (2) was as follows: good to excellent test-retest reliability was found with ICC<sub>2.1</sub> value (95% confidence interval) 0.88 (0.84-0.91), excellent internal consistency for the 13-item COPI-Adult (DK) with α = 0.939, SEM of 2.53, and SDC of 7.02.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The COPI-Adult (DK) was successfully translated and contextually adapted. It is a reliable questionnaire with excellent internal consistency. The COPI-Adult (DK) shows promise in research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pain is a growing concern globally, and an individual and societal burden. Pain science education (PSE) is a promising avenue for managing chronic pain, but targeted PSE is needed. The Concept of Pain Inventory for Adults (COPI-Adult) is a newly developed self-reported outcome measure aimed at targeting PSE. It is currently unavailable in Danish and has unknown reliability. The aims of this study were (1) to translate and contextually adapt to Danish and (2) to determine reliability in terms of test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and measurement error.

Methods: Step (1) was as follows: a dual panel approach was used to translate, contextually adapt into a Danish version. Step (2) was follows: a heterogenic sample of Danish adults >18 years (n = 150) was included in the test-retest analysis, test interval between 7 and 14 days, both answered via REDCap-link. Based on COSMIN recommendations, the following reliabilities were estimated: the test-retest using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2.1) and internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha level. Measurement error in terms of standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were calculated.

Results: Step (1) was as follows: the first panel reached 100% consensus on the wording of the COPI-Adult (DK), with no alterations by the second panel. Step (2) was as follows: good to excellent test-retest reliability was found with ICC2.1 value (95% confidence interval) 0.88 (0.84-0.91), excellent internal consistency for the 13-item COPI-Adult (DK) with α = 0.939, SEM of 2.53, and SDC of 7.02.

Discussion: The COPI-Adult (DK) was successfully translated and contextually adapted. It is a reliable questionnaire with excellent internal consistency. The COPI-Adult (DK) shows promise in research and clinical practice.

丹麦疼痛概念量表(COPI-Adult (DK))的翻译、环境适应性和可靠性--一种自我报告的结果测量法。
目的:疼痛是全球日益关注的问题,也是个人和社会的负担。疼痛科学教育(PSE)是管理慢性疼痛的一个很有前景的途径,但需要有针对性的疼痛科学教育。成人疼痛概念量表(COPI-Adult)是一种新开发的自我报告结果测量方法,旨在开展有针对性的 PSE。目前还没有丹麦语版本,其可靠性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是:(1) 翻译并根据丹麦语语境进行调整;(2) 从测试再测可靠性、内部一致性和测量误差等方面确定可靠性:步骤(1)如下:采用双小组方法翻译并根据具体情况调整为丹麦语版本。步骤(2)如下:将年龄大于 18 岁的丹麦成年人(n = 150)纳入重复测试分析,测试间隔为 7 至 14 天,均通过 REDCap-link 进行回答。根据 COSMIN 的建议,对以下可靠性进行了估算:使用类内相关系数(ICC2.1)对重测进行估算,使用 Cronbach's alpha 水平对内部一致性进行估算。以测量标准误差(SEM)和可检测到的最小变化(SDC)为单位计算测量误差:步骤(1)如下:第一小组就 COPI-成人(DK)的措辞达成了 100% 的共识,第二小组未作任何修改。步骤(2)如下:ICC2.1 值(95% 置信区间)为 0.88(0.84-0.91),13 项 COPI-Adult (DK) 的内部一致性极佳,α = 0.939,SEM 为 2.53,SDC 为 7.02:COPI-Adult (DK) 已被成功翻译并根据实际情况进行了调整。它是一份可靠的问卷,具有良好的内部一致性。COPI-Adult (DK) 在研究和临床实践中大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信