Facing ethical concerns in the age of precise gene therapy: Outlook on inherited arrhythmias.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Federico Carbone, Fabrizio Montecucco
{"title":"Facing ethical concerns in the age of precise gene therapy: Outlook on inherited arrhythmias.","authors":"Federico Carbone, Fabrizio Montecucco","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v16.i2.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This editorial, comments on the article by Spartalis <i>et al</i> published in the recent issue of the <i>World Journal of Cardiology</i>. We here provide an outlook on potential ethical concerns related to the future application of gene therapy in the field of inherited arrhythmias. As monogenic diseases with no or few therapeutic options available through standard care, inherited arrhythmias are ideal candidates to gene therapy in their treatment. Patients with inherited arrhythmias typically have a poor quality of life, especially young people engaged in agonistic sports. While genome editing for treatment of inherited arrhythmias still has theoretical application, advances in CRISPR/Cas9 technology now allows the generation of knock-in animal models of the disease. However, clinical translation is somehow expected soon and this make consistent discussing about ethical concerns related to gene editing in inherited arrhythmias. Genomic off-target activity is a known technical issue, but its relationship with ethnical and individual genetical diversity raises concerns about an equitable accessibility. Meanwhile, the cost-effectiveness may further limit an equal distribution of gene therapies. The economic burden of gene therapies on healthcare systems is is increasingly recognized as a pressing concern. A growing body of studies are reporting uncertainty in payback periods with intuitive short-term effects for insurance-based healthcare systems, but potential concerns for universal healthcare systems in the long term as well. Altogether, those aspects strongly indicate a need of regulatory entities to manage those issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"16 2","pages":"64-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i2.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This editorial, comments on the article by Spartalis et al published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Cardiology. We here provide an outlook on potential ethical concerns related to the future application of gene therapy in the field of inherited arrhythmias. As monogenic diseases with no or few therapeutic options available through standard care, inherited arrhythmias are ideal candidates to gene therapy in their treatment. Patients with inherited arrhythmias typically have a poor quality of life, especially young people engaged in agonistic sports. While genome editing for treatment of inherited arrhythmias still has theoretical application, advances in CRISPR/Cas9 technology now allows the generation of knock-in animal models of the disease. However, clinical translation is somehow expected soon and this make consistent discussing about ethical concerns related to gene editing in inherited arrhythmias. Genomic off-target activity is a known technical issue, but its relationship with ethnical and individual genetical diversity raises concerns about an equitable accessibility. Meanwhile, the cost-effectiveness may further limit an equal distribution of gene therapies. The economic burden of gene therapies on healthcare systems is is increasingly recognized as a pressing concern. A growing body of studies are reporting uncertainty in payback periods with intuitive short-term effects for insurance-based healthcare systems, but potential concerns for universal healthcare systems in the long term as well. Altogether, those aspects strongly indicate a need of regulatory entities to manage those issues.

面对精确基因治疗时代的伦理问题:遗传性心律失常展望。
这篇社论对 Spartalis 等人发表在最近一期《世界心脏病学杂志》上的文章进行了评论。我们在此就基因疗法未来在遗传性心律失常领域的应用可能涉及的伦理问题进行展望。遗传性心律失常是一种单基因疾病,没有或很少有标准治疗方法可供选择,因此基因疗法是治疗遗传性心律失常的理想选择。遗传性心律失常患者的生活质量通常很差,尤其是从事激烈运动的年轻人。虽然基因组编辑治疗遗传性心律失常在理论上仍有应用前景,但随着 CRISPR/Cas9 技术的发展,现在已经可以制作出基因敲入的动物模型。然而,临床转化预计很快就会实现,这使得人们对基因编辑治疗遗传性心律失常的伦理问题进行了一致的讨论。基因组脱靶活动是一个已知的技术问题,但它与种族和个体基因多样性的关系引发了对公平可及性的担忧。同时,成本效益可能会进一步限制基因疗法的平等分配。基因疗法对医疗保健系统造成的经济负担日益被视为一个紧迫的问题。越来越多的研究报告指出,投资回收期存在不确定性,对以保险为基础的医疗保健系统具有直观的短期影响,但对全民医疗保健系统的长期影响也存在潜在隐忧。总之,这些方面强烈表明监管实体需要管理这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信