Are In-the-Moment Resilience Processes Predicted by Questionnaire-Based Measures of Resilience?

IF 3.5 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1177/10731911241234220

Daniel Ventus, Patrik Söderberg

{"title":"Are In-the-Moment Resilience Processes Predicted by Questionnaire-Based Measures of Resilience?","authors":"Daniel Ventus, Patrik Söderberg","doi":"10.1177/10731911241234220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on resilience is a growing field, and resilience has been conceptualized and operationalized in multiple ways. The aim of this study was to compare the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS), a conventional measure of resilience, with within-person process indicators derived from experience sampling method (ESM). A sample of 177 teachers from southern Finland participated in the study, commencing with a startup session followed by an 8-day ESM period. Through twice-daily prompts, participants reported their immediate positive and negative affect as well as recent stressors encountered, such as workload and challenging social interactions. As expected, within-person variation in affect was predicted by stressors. However, contrary to expectations, individual differences in affective reactivity to stressors were not predicted by BRCS (βpositive affect [95% CI] = -.20, [-.51, .11]; βnegative affect = .33, [-.07, .69]). Item response theory analyses of the BRCS revealed problems with precision. The results call into question the validity of measuring resilience using single administrations of retrospective self-report questionnaires such as the BRCS.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1615-1625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241234220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on resilience is a growing field, and resilience has been conceptualized and operationalized in multiple ways. The aim of this study was to compare the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS), a conventional measure of resilience, with within-person process indicators derived from experience sampling method (ESM). A sample of 177 teachers from southern Finland participated in the study, commencing with a startup session followed by an 8-day ESM period. Through twice-daily prompts, participants reported their immediate positive and negative affect as well as recent stressors encountered, such as workload and challenging social interactions. As expected, within-person variation in affect was predicted by stressors. However, contrary to expectations, individual differences in affective reactivity to stressors were not predicted by BRCS (β_{positive affect} [95% CI] = -.20, [-.51, .11]; β_{negative affect} = .33, [-.07, .69]). Item response theory analyses of the BRCS revealed problems with precision. The results call into question the validity of measuring resilience using single administrations of retrospective self-report questionnaires such as the BRCS.

查看原文本刊更多论文

以问卷为基础的复原力测量能预测当下的复原力过程吗？

抗逆力研究是一个不断发展的领域，抗逆力的概念和操作方法多种多样。本研究的目的是比较简明抗逆力应对量表（BRCS）和经验取样法（ESM）得出的人内过程指标，简明抗逆力应对量表是一种传统的抗逆力测量方法。来自芬兰南部的 177 名教师参加了这项研究，他们首先参加了启动课程，然后参加了为期 8 天的体验取样法。通过每天两次的提示，参与者报告了他们即时的积极和消极情绪，以及最近遇到的压力，如工作量和具有挑战性的社会交往。不出所料，压力因素会导致人与人之间的情感差异。然而，与预期相反的是，BRCS 并不能预测个体对压力源的情绪反应差异（β 积极情绪 [95% CI] = -.20, [-.51, .11]; β 消极情绪 = .33, [-.07, .69]）。对 BRCS 的项目反应理论分析表明，其精确性存在问题。这些结果使人们对使用单次施测的回顾性自我报告问卷（如 BRCS）来测量抗逆力的有效性产生了质疑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

8.90

自引率

2.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.