Relationship between Treatment Choices according to the Modified Osteoporotic Fracture Score and Posttreatment Radiographic Outcomes.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.31616/asj.2023.0319
Shinya Tokunaga, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Koki Mitani, Tomoo Inoue, Ryo Kanematsu, Manabu Minami, Izumi Suda, Sho Nakamura, Junya Hanakita
{"title":"Relationship between Treatment Choices according to the Modified Osteoporotic Fracture Score and Posttreatment Radiographic Outcomes.","authors":"Shinya Tokunaga, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Koki Mitani, Tomoo Inoue, Ryo Kanematsu, Manabu Minami, Izumi Suda, Sho Nakamura, Junya Hanakita","doi":"10.31616/asj.2023.0319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the modified osteoporotic fracture (mOF) scores in three treatment groups and compare imaging findings in patients treated and not treated according to the mOF score-based treatment recommendation.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>The osteoporotic fracture (OF) score was established by the AO Spine to guide therapeutic decisions. To enhance its applicability, a mOF score was recently introduced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients diagnosed with OFs at Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital were divided into three groups: nonsurgical therapy, balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), and open surgery groups. The mOF score was calculated, and the levels of independence and posttreatment imaging data were compared between patients treated and not treated according to the mOF score-based treatment recommendation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 118 patients were included (nonsurgical therapy, n=57; BKP, n=48; open surgery, n=13), of whom 100 (85%) received treatment consistent with the mOF score-based treatment recommendation. In the BKP and open surgery groups, the mOF scorebased treatment recommendations were consistent with the actual treatment in 93% of the patients. However, in the nonsurgical group, the mOF score-based treatment recommendation was not consistent with the actual treatment in 25% of the patients. In this group, patients not treated according to the mOF score had significantly shorter vertebral body height, greater local kyphosis, and smaller sacral slope after treatment than patients treated according to the mOF score-based treatment recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the BKP and open surgery groups, the mOF scores were consistent with actual clinical selection. In the nonsurgical therapy group, patients not treated according to the mOF score-based treatment recommendation exhibited severe vertebral body deformity and a less well-balanced spine shape after treatment. The mOF score may help in selecting suitable treatments for OFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"251-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2023.0319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective observational study.

Purpose: To evaluate the modified osteoporotic fracture (mOF) scores in three treatment groups and compare imaging findings in patients treated and not treated according to the mOF score-based treatment recommendation.

Overview of literature: The osteoporotic fracture (OF) score was established by the AO Spine to guide therapeutic decisions. To enhance its applicability, a mOF score was recently introduced.

Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with OFs at Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital were divided into three groups: nonsurgical therapy, balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), and open surgery groups. The mOF score was calculated, and the levels of independence and posttreatment imaging data were compared between patients treated and not treated according to the mOF score-based treatment recommendation.

Results: In total, 118 patients were included (nonsurgical therapy, n=57; BKP, n=48; open surgery, n=13), of whom 100 (85%) received treatment consistent with the mOF score-based treatment recommendation. In the BKP and open surgery groups, the mOF scorebased treatment recommendations were consistent with the actual treatment in 93% of the patients. However, in the nonsurgical group, the mOF score-based treatment recommendation was not consistent with the actual treatment in 25% of the patients. In this group, patients not treated according to the mOF score had significantly shorter vertebral body height, greater local kyphosis, and smaller sacral slope after treatment than patients treated according to the mOF score-based treatment recommendation.

Conclusions: In the BKP and open surgery groups, the mOF scores were consistent with actual clinical selection. In the nonsurgical therapy group, patients not treated according to the mOF score-based treatment recommendation exhibited severe vertebral body deformity and a less well-balanced spine shape after treatment. The mOF score may help in selecting suitable treatments for OFs.

根据改良骨质疏松性骨折评分做出的治疗选择与治疗后放射学结果之间的关系。
研究设计:回顾性观察研究:目的:评估三个治疗组的 mOF 评分,并比较根据基于 mOF 评分的治疗建议进行治疗和未进行治疗的患者的影像学结果:骨质疏松性骨折(OF)评分由 AO 脊柱协会制定,用于指导治疗决策。为了提高其适用性,最近推出了修正的 OF(mOF)评分:方法:将富士田平成纪念医院确诊的 OF 患者分为三组:非手术治疗组、球囊椎体成形术(BKP)组和开放手术组。根据基于 mOF 评分的治疗建议,计算 mOF 评分,并比较治疗和非治疗患者的独立性水平和治疗后的影像学数据:结果:共纳入 118 例患者(非手术疗法,57 例;BKP,48 例;开放手术,13 例),其中 100 例(85%)接受了与基于 mOF 评分的治疗建议一致的治疗。在 BKP 和开放手术组中,基于 mOF 评分的治疗建议与 93% 患者的实际治疗一致。然而,在非手术组中,有 25% 的患者基于 mOF 评分的治疗建议与实际治疗不一致。在这组患者中,未根据 mOF 评分进行治疗的患者与根据基于 mOF 评分的治疗建议进行治疗的患者相比,治疗后的椎体高度明显较短、局部后凸较大、骶骨斜度较小:在 BKP 组和开放手术组,mOF 评分与实际临床选择一致。结论:在 BKP 组和开放手术组中,mOF 评分与实际临床选择一致;在非手术治疗组中,未根据基于 mOF 评分的治疗建议进行治疗的患者在治疗后表现出严重的椎体畸形和不太平衡的脊柱形状。mOF 评分有助于选择合适的 OF 治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信