An analysis of the NCAA college football playoff team selections using an Elo ratings model

Benjamin Lucas
{"title":"An analysis of the NCAA college football playoff team selections using an Elo ratings model","authors":"Benjamin Lucas","doi":"arxiv-2403.03862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In December 2023 the Florida State Seminoles became the first Power 5 school\nto have an undefeated season and miss selection for the College Football\nPlayoff. In order to assess this decision, we employed an Elo ratings model to\nrank the teams and found that the selection committee's decision was justified\nand that Florida State were not one of the four best teams in college football\nin that season (ranking only 11th!). We extended this analysis to all other\nyears of the CFP and found that the top four teams by Elo ratings differ\ngreatly from the four teams selected in almost every year of the CFP's\nexistence. Furthermore, we found that there have been more egregious\nnon-selections including when Alabama was ranked first by Elo ratings in 2022\nand were not selected. The analysis suggests that the current criteria are too\nsubjective and a ratings model should be implemented to provide transparency\nfor the sport, its teams, and its fans.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.03862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In December 2023 the Florida State Seminoles became the first Power 5 school to have an undefeated season and miss selection for the College Football Playoff. In order to assess this decision, we employed an Elo ratings model to rank the teams and found that the selection committee's decision was justified and that Florida State were not one of the four best teams in college football in that season (ranking only 11th!). We extended this analysis to all other years of the CFP and found that the top four teams by Elo ratings differ greatly from the four teams selected in almost every year of the CFP's existence. Furthermore, we found that there have been more egregious non-selections including when Alabama was ranked first by Elo ratings in 2022 and were not selected. The analysis suggests that the current criteria are too subjective and a ratings model should be implemented to provide transparency for the sport, its teams, and its fans.
使用 Elo 评分模型分析 NCAA 大学橄榄球季后赛球队选拔情况
2023 年 12 月,佛罗里达州立大学塞米诺尔队成为第一支赛季保持不败,但未能入选大学橄榄球季后赛的五强学校。为了对这一决定进行评估,我们采用了 Elo 评分模型对各支球队进行了排名,结果发现选拔委员会的决定是合理的,佛罗里达州立大学并不是该赛季大学橄榄球赛事中最好的四支球队之一(仅排名第 11 位!)。我们将这一分析扩展到 CFP 的其他年份,发现 Elo 评分排名前四的球队与 CFP 几乎每年选出的四支球队都有很大不同。此外,我们还发现出现了更严重的落选情况,包括 2022 年阿拉巴马队在 Elo 评分中排名第一却落选。分析表明,目前的标准过于主观,应该实施一种评级模式,为这项运动、球队和球迷提供透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信