Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation applied as the adjuvant treatment of venous leg ulcers - preliminary study.

IF 1.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-02 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1080/15368378.2024.2325414
Jarosław Pasek, Sebastian Szajkowski, Grzegorz Cieślar
{"title":"Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation applied as the adjuvant treatment of venous leg ulcers - preliminary study.","authors":"Jarosław Pasek, Sebastian Szajkowski, Grzegorz Cieślar","doi":"10.1080/15368378.2024.2325414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Venous leg ulcers are chronic wounds that are difficult to cure. The aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of two methods of physical medicine - magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation, applied as adjuvant treatment in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 81 patients, 37 male (45.6%) and 44 female (54.3%) ones, age range between 45 and 90 years, with venous leg ulcers. The patients were assigned to two study groups: magneto-LED therapy (group 1) or magnetostimulation (group 2). In both groups, a total of 40 daily procedures were performed. Wound healing was evaluated using computerized planimetry and the pain intensity on numeric rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After treatment, the decrease in healing rate in group 1 was statistically significantly higher in comparison to group 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while a statistically significant reduction in the surface area of ulcers was obtained, amounting on the average from 6.34 ± 1.29 cm<sup>2</sup> to 2.31 ± 1.25 cm<sup>2</sup> in group 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and from 6.52 ± 1.20 cm<sup>2</sup> to 4.79 ± 1.17 cm<sup>2</sup> in group 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The percentage changes of ulcers area in group 1 (64.21 ± 17.94%) were statistically significantly greater as compared to group 2 (25.87 ± 14.07%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After treatment, the decrease in pain relief in group 1 was statistically significantly higher in comparison to group 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.006), while pain intensity after treatment decreased statistically significantly in both compared groups of patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation caused significant reduction of surface area of the treated venous leg ulcers and pain intensity, yet magneto-LED therapy was more efficient. Both evaluated methods also significantly reduced pain intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50544,"journal":{"name":"Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2024.2325414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Venous leg ulcers are chronic wounds that are difficult to cure. The aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of two methods of physical medicine - magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation, applied as adjuvant treatment in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Methods: The study included 81 patients, 37 male (45.6%) and 44 female (54.3%) ones, age range between 45 and 90 years, with venous leg ulcers. The patients were assigned to two study groups: magneto-LED therapy (group 1) or magnetostimulation (group 2). In both groups, a total of 40 daily procedures were performed. Wound healing was evaluated using computerized planimetry and the pain intensity on numeric rating scale.

Results: After treatment, the decrease in healing rate in group 1 was statistically significantly higher in comparison to group 2 (p < 0.001), while a statistically significant reduction in the surface area of ulcers was obtained, amounting on the average from 6.34 ± 1.29 cm2 to 2.31 ± 1.25 cm2 in group 1 (p < 0.001), and from 6.52 ± 1.20 cm2 to 4.79 ± 1.17 cm2 in group 2 (p < 0.001). The percentage changes of ulcers area in group 1 (64.21 ± 17.94%) were statistically significantly greater as compared to group 2 (25.87 ± 14.07%) (p < 0.001). After treatment, the decrease in pain relief in group 1 was statistically significantly higher in comparison to group 2 (p = 0.006), while pain intensity after treatment decreased statistically significantly in both compared groups of patients (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation caused significant reduction of surface area of the treated venous leg ulcers and pain intensity, yet magneto-LED therapy was more efficient. Both evaluated methods also significantly reduced pain intensity.

作为静脉性腿部溃疡辅助治疗方法的磁LED疗法和磁刺激疗法的疗效比较--初步研究。
目的:腿部静脉溃疡是一种难以治愈的慢性伤口。研究旨在比较两种物理疗法--磁LED疗法和磁刺激疗法--在治疗腿部静脉溃疡中的辅助治疗效果:研究对象包括 81 名腿部静脉溃疡患者,其中男性 37 名(45.6%),女性 44 名(54.3%),年龄在 45 岁至 90 岁之间。患者被分配到两个研究组:磁LED疗法(第1组)或磁刺激疗法(第2组)。两组患者每天共进行 40 次治疗。使用计算机平面测量法评估伤口愈合情况,并使用数字评分表评估疼痛强度:治疗后,与第二组相比,第一组的伤口愈合率下降明显(第一组为 2.31 ± 1.25 平方厘米,第二组为 4.79 ± 1.17 平方厘米(P = 0.006)),而两组患者治疗后的疼痛强度均明显下降(P 结论:第一组的伤口愈合率明显高于第二组(P = 0.006),而第二组的疼痛强度明显低于第一组(P = 0.006):磁LED疗法和磁刺激疗法可显著减少治疗后腿静脉溃疡的表面积和疼痛强度,但磁LED疗法更有效。两种评估方法都能明显减轻疼痛强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope: Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, publishes peer-reviewed research articles on the biological effects and medical applications of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (from extremely-low frequency to radiofrequency). Topic examples include in vitro and in vivo studies, epidemiological investigation, mechanism and mode of interaction between non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and biological systems. In addition to publishing original articles, the journal also publishes meeting summaries and reports, and reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信