Decision-making process regarding passive euthanasia: Theory of planned behavior framework.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1177/09697330241238346
Ronit Tsemach, Anat Amit Aharon
{"title":"Decision-making process regarding passive euthanasia: Theory of planned behavior framework.","authors":"Ronit Tsemach, Anat Amit Aharon","doi":"10.1177/09697330241238346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses have an essential role in caring for end-of-life patients. Nevertheless, the nurse's involvement in the passive euthanasia decision-making process is insufficient and lower than expected.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore factors associated with nurses' intention to be involved in non-treatment decisions (NTD) regarding passive euthanasia decision-making versus their involvement in the palliative care of patients requesting euthanasia, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) framework.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study utilizing a random sample.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>The study was conducted in one of the largest hospitals in Israel among 125 nurses employed in internal and surgical care wards. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews between March and April 2019.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A closed structured questionnaire was developed according to TPB instructions. A paired sample <i>t</i> test and two multiple hierarchical regressions were conducted. Variance explained (R<sup>2</sup>) and the significance of F change were calculated for each regression. The study used the STROBE statement guideline.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The study was approved by the hospital's Helsinki Committee (#20.11.2017).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A paired sample <i>t</i> test revealed that nurses' involvement in the palliative care of patients requesting passive euthanasia was significantly higher than in NTD regarding euthanasia. Regression analyses revealed that nurses' position and attitudes explain their intention to be involved in decision-making; attitudes and perceived behavioral control explain nurses' intention to be involved in the care of patients requesting euthanasia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the TPB, nurses' attitudes explained their intention to participate in decision-making regarding passive euthanasia. It is recommended to enhance open discussion of this complex issue to encourage nurses' willingness to participate in NTD decision-making regarding euthanasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"399-411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241238346","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurses have an essential role in caring for end-of-life patients. Nevertheless, the nurse's involvement in the passive euthanasia decision-making process is insufficient and lower than expected.

Objectives: To explore factors associated with nurses' intention to be involved in non-treatment decisions (NTD) regarding passive euthanasia decision-making versus their involvement in the palliative care of patients requesting euthanasia, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) framework.

Design: A cross-sectional study utilizing a random sample.

Participants and research context: The study was conducted in one of the largest hospitals in Israel among 125 nurses employed in internal and surgical care wards. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews between March and April 2019.

Method: A closed structured questionnaire was developed according to TPB instructions. A paired sample t test and two multiple hierarchical regressions were conducted. Variance explained (R2) and the significance of F change were calculated for each regression. The study used the STROBE statement guideline.

Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the hospital's Helsinki Committee (#20.11.2017).

Findings: A paired sample t test revealed that nurses' involvement in the palliative care of patients requesting passive euthanasia was significantly higher than in NTD regarding euthanasia. Regression analyses revealed that nurses' position and attitudes explain their intention to be involved in decision-making; attitudes and perceived behavioral control explain nurses' intention to be involved in the care of patients requesting euthanasia.

Conclusions: According to the TPB, nurses' attitudes explained their intention to participate in decision-making regarding passive euthanasia. It is recommended to enhance open discussion of this complex issue to encourage nurses' willingness to participate in NTD decision-making regarding euthanasia.

被动安乐死的决策过程:计划行为理论框架。
背景:护士在护理临终病人方面发挥着重要作用。然而,护士在被动安乐死决策过程中的参与度不足,且低于预期:采用计划行为理论(TPB)框架,探讨护士是否有意参与被动安乐死决策中的非治疗决策(NTD),以及是否参与对请求安乐死患者的姑息治疗的相关因素:设计:采用随机抽样的横断面研究:研究在以色列最大的医院之一进行,有 125 名护士受雇于内科和外科护理病房。数据是在 2019 年 3 月至 4 月期间通过面对面访谈收集的:根据 TPB 说明编制了封闭式结构问卷。进行了配对样本 t 检验和两次多重分层回归。每次回归都计算了解释的方差(R2)和 F 变化的显著性。研究采用了 STROBE 声明指南:该研究获得了医院赫尔辛基委员会的批准(2017 年 11 月 20 日):配对样本t检验显示,护士对要求被动安乐死患者的姑息治疗参与度明显高于NTD对安乐死的参与度。回归分析显示,护士的立场和态度解释了其参与决策的意向;态度和感知行为控制解释了护士参与要求安乐死患者护理的意向:根据 TPB,护士的态度解释了其参与被动安乐死决策的意愿。建议加强对这一复杂问题的公开讨论,以鼓励护士参与新农合安乐死决策的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信