Effectiveness of Trauma-Informed Care Implementation in Health Care Settings: Systematic Review of Reviews and Realist Synthesis.

Q2 Social Sciences
The Permanente journal Pub Date : 2024-03-15 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.7812/TPP/23.127
Ellen Goldstein, Binny Chokshi, G J Melendez-Torres, Anna Rios, Martina Jelley, Annie Lewis-O'Connor
{"title":"Effectiveness of Trauma-Informed Care Implementation in Health Care Settings: Systematic Review of Reviews and Realist Synthesis.","authors":"Ellen Goldstein, Binny Chokshi, G J Melendez-Torres, Anna Rios, Martina Jelley, Annie Lewis-O'Connor","doi":"10.7812/TPP/23.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the ubiquity of traumatic exposures and the profound impact of trauma on health, a trauma-informed care (TIC) approach in health care is critical. TIC seeks to promote safety within health care and prevent retraumatization. The lack of systems-level data has been a major barrier to TIC implementation. This study aimed to understand the mechanisms and outcomes effective in implementing TIC across health systems using a systematic review of reviews and realist synthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Applied Social Science Index & Abstracts identified reviews addressing TIC in health care published in the last 10 years in peer-reviewed journals. Realist synthesis methodology was used to develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Thematic analysis was performed to generate a framework for the mechanisms of implementation that produce successful TIC outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen articles featuring varied review types were included. The results, highlighting the strategies that lead to improved outcomes for patients and systems, were mapped to SAMHSA's 10 TIC implementation domains, including engagement and involvement; training and workforce development; cross-sector collaboration; screening, assessment, and treatment services; governance and leadership; policy; evaluation; progress monitoring and quality assurance; financing; and physical environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support the use of SAMHSA's 10 implementation domains in varied health care contexts to facilitate effective TIC processes. Future work should continue to evaluate the effectiveness of TIC approaches and may consider how health equity and strengths-based approaches fit within SAMHSA's framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"135-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/23.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Given the ubiquity of traumatic exposures and the profound impact of trauma on health, a trauma-informed care (TIC) approach in health care is critical. TIC seeks to promote safety within health care and prevent retraumatization. The lack of systems-level data has been a major barrier to TIC implementation. This study aimed to understand the mechanisms and outcomes effective in implementing TIC across health systems using a systematic review of reviews and realist synthesis.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Applied Social Science Index & Abstracts identified reviews addressing TIC in health care published in the last 10 years in peer-reviewed journals. Realist synthesis methodology was used to develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Thematic analysis was performed to generate a framework for the mechanisms of implementation that produce successful TIC outcomes.

Results: Sixteen articles featuring varied review types were included. The results, highlighting the strategies that lead to improved outcomes for patients and systems, were mapped to SAMHSA's 10 TIC implementation domains, including engagement and involvement; training and workforce development; cross-sector collaboration; screening, assessment, and treatment services; governance and leadership; policy; evaluation; progress monitoring and quality assurance; financing; and physical environment.

Conclusion: The findings support the use of SAMHSA's 10 implementation domains in varied health care contexts to facilitate effective TIC processes. Future work should continue to evaluate the effectiveness of TIC approaches and may consider how health equity and strengths-based approaches fit within SAMHSA's framework.

在医疗机构实施创伤知情护理的有效性:系统性综述和现实主义综合。
目的:鉴于创伤无处不在以及创伤对健康的深远影响,在医疗保健中采用创伤知情护理(TIC)方法至关重要。创伤知情护理(TIC)旨在促进医疗保健的安全性,防止再次造成创伤。缺乏系统层面的数据一直是实施创伤知情护理的主要障碍。本研究旨在通过系统性综述和现实主义综合,了解在各医疗系统中有效实施 TIC 的机制和结果:方法:通过对 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) 和 Applied Social Science Index & Abstracts 进行系统检索,确定了过去 10 年中在同行评审期刊上发表的有关医疗保健领域 TIC 的综述。采用现实主义综合方法来开发背景-机制-结果配置。通过主题分析,为产生成功的技术信息与交流成果的实施机制制定了一个框架:结果:共收录了 16 篇文章,其审查类型各不相同。研究结果强调了能够为患者和系统带来更好结果的策略,并将其与萨姆卫生署的 10 个 TIC 实施领域进行了映射,包括参与和介入;培训和劳动力发展;跨部门合作;筛查、评估和治疗服务;管理和领导;政策;评估;进展监测和质量保证;融资;以及物理环境:研究结果支持在不同的医疗保健环境中使用 SAMHSA 的 10 个实施领域,以促进有效的 TIC 进程。未来的工作应继续评估 TIC 方法的有效性,并可考虑如何将健康公平和基于优势的方法纳入 SAMHSA 的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信