Centre variation in home dialysis uptake: A survey of kidney centre practice in relation to home dialysis organisation and delivery in England.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Peritoneal Dialysis International Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1177/08968608241232200
Sarah Damery, Mark Lambie, Iestyn Williams, David Coyle, James Fotheringham, Ivonne Solis-Trapala, Kerry Allen, Jessica Potts, Lisa Dikomitis, Simon J Davies
{"title":"Centre variation in home dialysis uptake: A survey of kidney centre practice in relation to home dialysis organisation and delivery in England.","authors":"Sarah Damery, Mark Lambie, Iestyn Williams, David Coyle, James Fotheringham, Ivonne Solis-Trapala, Kerry Allen, Jessica Potts, Lisa Dikomitis, Simon J Davies","doi":"10.1177/08968608241232200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in home dialysis uptake across England suggest inequity and unexplained variation in access. We surveyed staff at all English kidney centres to identify patterns in service organisation/delivery and explore correlations with home therapy uptake, as part of a larger study ('Inter-CEPt'), which aims to identify potentially modifiable factors to address observed variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June and September 2022, staff working at English kidney centres were surveyed and individual responses combined into one centre-level response per question using predetermined data aggregation rules. Descriptive analysis described centre practices and their correlation with home dialysis uptake (proportion of new home dialysis starters) using 2019 UK Renal Registry 12-month home dialysis incidence data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 180 responses were received (50/51 centres, 98.0%). Despite varied organisation of home dialysis services, most components of service delivery and practice had minimal or weak correlations with home dialysis uptake apart from offering assisted peritoneal dialysis and 'promoting flexible decision-making about dialysis modality'. Moderate to strong correlations were identified between home dialysis uptake and centres reporting supportive clinical leadership (correlation 0.32, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.05-0.55), an organisational culture that values trying new initiatives (0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.73); support for reflective practice (0.38, 95% CI: 0.11-0.60), facilitating research engagement (0.39, 95% CI: 0.13-0.61) and promoting continuous quality improvement (0.29, 95% CI: 0.01-0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uptake of home dialysis is likely to be driven by organisational culture, leadership and staff attitudes, which provide a supportive clinical environment within which specific components of service organisation and delivery can be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"265-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241232200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disparities in home dialysis uptake across England suggest inequity and unexplained variation in access. We surveyed staff at all English kidney centres to identify patterns in service organisation/delivery and explore correlations with home therapy uptake, as part of a larger study ('Inter-CEPt'), which aims to identify potentially modifiable factors to address observed variations.

Methods: Between June and September 2022, staff working at English kidney centres were surveyed and individual responses combined into one centre-level response per question using predetermined data aggregation rules. Descriptive analysis described centre practices and their correlation with home dialysis uptake (proportion of new home dialysis starters) using 2019 UK Renal Registry 12-month home dialysis incidence data.

Results: In total, 180 responses were received (50/51 centres, 98.0%). Despite varied organisation of home dialysis services, most components of service delivery and practice had minimal or weak correlations with home dialysis uptake apart from offering assisted peritoneal dialysis and 'promoting flexible decision-making about dialysis modality'. Moderate to strong correlations were identified between home dialysis uptake and centres reporting supportive clinical leadership (correlation 0.32, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.05-0.55), an organisational culture that values trying new initiatives (0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.73); support for reflective practice (0.38, 95% CI: 0.11-0.60), facilitating research engagement (0.39, 95% CI: 0.13-0.61) and promoting continuous quality improvement (0.29, 95% CI: 0.01-0.53).

Conclusions: Uptake of home dialysis is likely to be driven by organisational culture, leadership and staff attitudes, which provide a supportive clinical environment within which specific components of service organisation and delivery can be effective.

家庭透析使用率的中心差异:英国肾脏中心有关家庭透析组织和实施的实践调查。
背景:英格兰各地家庭透析接受率的差异表明存在不公平和无法解释的差异。我们对英格兰所有肾脏中心的工作人员进行了调查,以确定服务组织/提供的模式,并探索与家庭治疗接受率的相关性,这是一项大型研究("Inter-CEPt")的一部分,该研究旨在确定潜在的可调整因素,以解决观察到的差异:2022 年 6 月至 9 月期间,我们对英国肾脏中心的工作人员进行了调查,并使用预先确定的数据汇总规则将每个问题的个人答复合并为一个中心层面的答复。利用2019年英国肾脏登记处12个月的家庭透析发生率数据,对中心的做法及其与家庭透析吸收率(新开始家庭透析的比例)的相关性进行描述性分析:共收到 180 份回复(50/51 个中心,98.0%)。尽管家庭透析服务的组织形式各不相同,但除了提供辅助腹膜透析和 "促进透析方式的灵活决策 "外,大多数服务提供和实践内容与家庭透析接受率的相关性很小或很弱。家庭透析使用率与报告支持性临床领导的中心(相关性为 0.32,95% 置信区间 (CI):0.05-0.55)、重视尝试新举措的组织文化(相关性为 0.57,95% CI:0.34-0.73)、支持反思性实践(0.38,95% CI:0.11-0.60)、促进研究参与(0.39,95% CI:0.13-0.61)和促进持续质量改进(0.29,95% CI:0.01-0.53):家庭透析的使用率可能受到组织文化、领导力和员工态度的影响,这些因素提供了一个支持性的临床环境,在此环境中,服务组织和提供的特定组成部分可以发挥有效作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信