Implementation of low-intensity thrombolysis monitoring care in routine practice: process evaluation of the Optimal Post rtPA-IV Monitoring in Acute Ischemic Stroke (OPTIMISTmain) study in the United States.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Menglu Ouyang, Francisca González, Michelle Montalbano, April Pruski, Stephen Jan, Xia Wang, Brenda Johnson, Debbie V Summers, Pooja Khatri, Alejandra Malavera, Michael Iacobelli, Roland Faigle, Paula Munoz-Venturelli, Francisca Urrutia Goldsack, Diana Day, Thompson G Robinson, Alice C Durham, Ahtasam Ebraimo, Lili Song, Yi Sui, Wan Asyraf Wan Zaidi, Richard I Lindley, Candice Delcourt, Victor Cruz Urrutia, Craig S Anderson, Hueiming Liu
{"title":"Implementation of low-intensity thrombolysis monitoring care in routine practice: process evaluation of the Optimal Post rtPA-IV Monitoring in Acute Ischemic Stroke (OPTIMISTmain) study in the United States.","authors":"Menglu Ouyang, Francisca González, Michelle Montalbano, April Pruski, Stephen Jan, Xia Wang, Brenda Johnson, Debbie V Summers, Pooja Khatri, Alejandra Malavera, Michael Iacobelli, Roland Faigle, Paula Munoz-Venturelli, Francisca Urrutia Goldsack, Diana Day, Thompson G Robinson, Alice C Durham, Ahtasam Ebraimo, Lili Song, Yi Sui, Wan Asyraf Wan Zaidi, Richard I Lindley, Candice Delcourt, Victor Cruz Urrutia, Craig S Anderson, Hueiming Liu","doi":"10.1159/000538136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ongoing OPTIMISTmain study, an international, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, aims to determine effectiveness and safety of low-intensity versus standard monitoring in thrombolysis-treated patients with mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke (AIS). An embedded process evaluation explored integration and impact of the intervention on care processes at participating US sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach with quantitative and qualitative data were collected between September 2021 and November 2022. Implementer surveys were undertaken at pre- and post-intervention phases to understand the perceptions of low-intensity monitoring strategy. A sample of stroke care nurses were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews at an early stage of post-intervention. Qualitative data were analyzed deductively using the normalization process theory; quantitative data were tabulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews with 21 nurses at 8 hospitals have shown low-intensity monitoring was well accepted, as there were less time constraints and reduced workload for each patient. There were initial safety concerns over missing deteriorating patients and difficulties in changing established routines. Proper training, education, and communication, and changing the habits and culture of care, were key elements to successfully adopting the new monitoring care into routine practice. Similar results were found in the post-intervention survey (42 nurses from 13 hospitals). Nurses reported time being freed up to provide patient education (56%), daily living care (50%), early mobilization (26%), mood/cognition assessment (44%), and other aspects (i.e. communication, family support).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-intensity monitoring for patients with mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke, facilitated by appropriate education and organizational support, appears feasible and acceptable at US hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The ongoing OPTIMISTmain study, an international, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, aims to determine effectiveness and safety of low-intensity versus standard monitoring in thrombolysis-treated patients with mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke (AIS). An embedded process evaluation explored integration and impact of the intervention on care processes at participating US sites.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach with quantitative and qualitative data were collected between September 2021 and November 2022. Implementer surveys were undertaken at pre- and post-intervention phases to understand the perceptions of low-intensity monitoring strategy. A sample of stroke care nurses were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews at an early stage of post-intervention. Qualitative data were analyzed deductively using the normalization process theory; quantitative data were tabulated.

Results: Interviews with 21 nurses at 8 hospitals have shown low-intensity monitoring was well accepted, as there were less time constraints and reduced workload for each patient. There were initial safety concerns over missing deteriorating patients and difficulties in changing established routines. Proper training, education, and communication, and changing the habits and culture of care, were key elements to successfully adopting the new monitoring care into routine practice. Similar results were found in the post-intervention survey (42 nurses from 13 hospitals). Nurses reported time being freed up to provide patient education (56%), daily living care (50%), early mobilization (26%), mood/cognition assessment (44%), and other aspects (i.e. communication, family support).

Conclusions: Low-intensity monitoring for patients with mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke, facilitated by appropriate education and organizational support, appears feasible and acceptable at US hospitals.

在常规实践中实施低强度溶栓监测护理:美国急性缺血性卒中 rtPA-IV 后最佳监测 (OPTIMISTmain) 研究的过程评估。
引言:正在进行的 OPTIMISTmain 研究是一项国际性多中心阶梯式分组随机试验,旨在确定轻度至中度急性缺血性卒中(AIS)溶栓治疗患者接受低强度监测与标准监测的有效性和安全性。一项嵌入式流程评估探讨了该干预措施在美国参与地点的整合情况及其对护理流程的影响:方法:采用混合方法,在 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 11 月期间收集定量和定性数据。在干预前和干预后阶段进行了实施者调查,以了解对低强度监测策略的看法。在干预后的早期阶段,邀请中风护理护士样本参与半结构化访谈。采用归一化过程理论对定性数据进行演绎分析;对定量数据进行列表分析:对 8 家医院的 21 名护士进行的访谈显示,低强度监测的接受度很高,因为时间限制较少,每名患者的工作量也减少了。最初,人们对遗漏病情恶化的病人和改变既定常规的困难存在安全顾虑。适当的培训、教育和沟通,以及改变护理习惯和文化,是成功将新的监测护理纳入常规实践的关键因素。干预后的调查(来自 13 家医院的 42 名护士)也发现了类似的结果。护士们表示,她们可以腾出时间来提供患者教育(56%)、日常生活护理(50%)、早期动员(26%)、情绪/认知评估(44%)以及其他方面(如沟通、家庭支持):结论:对轻度至中度急性缺血性卒中患者进行低强度监测,并辅以适当的教育和组织支持,在美国医院似乎是可行且可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信