A quantitative assessment of crop vulnerability to tephra hazard at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador: understanding the effect of volcanic and biological factors

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Noa Ligot, William Viera, Diego Peñaherrera, Benjamin Bernard, Patrick Bogaert, Pierre Delmelle
{"title":"A quantitative assessment of crop vulnerability to tephra hazard at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador: understanding the effect of volcanic and biological factors","authors":"Noa Ligot, William Viera, Diego Peñaherrera, Benjamin Bernard, Patrick Bogaert, Pierre Delmelle","doi":"10.1007/s00445-024-01710-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crops are regularly impacted by tephra from explosive volcanic eruptions, causing significant economic losses and jeopardising farmers’ livelihood at the local to regional scales. Crop vulnerability to tephra remains poorly understood, impeding the construction of robust risk models for agriculture. Previous studies of crop vulnerability to tephra are semi-quantitative and consider tephra accumulation as the only hazard intensity metric. Here, we provide a robust evaluation of crop vulnerability based on the analysis of 700 sets of quantitative data, allowing for the assessment of the influence of various volcanic and non-volcanic factors. We collected farmers’ perceptions of damage to fodders, root and tuber crops, leafy crops, legumes, cereals, tree fruits, non-tree fruits, and estimations of their yield loss due to the August 16–17, 2006, October–November, 2015, and February–March, 2016, eruptions of Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador. Crop yield loss increased with tephra loads (48 ± 35, 69 ± 33, and 76 ± 34% for &lt; 0.5, 0.5–5, and 5–50 kg m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively), and we found that exposure to tephra led to a greater decline in yield compared to existing predictions. The results further highlight the plant phenological stage as a key factor of vulnerability. Exposure to tephra during the flowering period of legumes, cereals, and tree fruits caused a median yield loss ≥ 80%. Legumes, tree fruits, and non-tree fruits are more vulnerable to tephra than onions. Quantitative knowledge on crop vulnerability to tephra can be obtained from post-eruption impact assessments provided that a large population sample is collected and careful uncertainty analysis is conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":55297,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Volcanology","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Volcanology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-024-01710-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crops are regularly impacted by tephra from explosive volcanic eruptions, causing significant economic losses and jeopardising farmers’ livelihood at the local to regional scales. Crop vulnerability to tephra remains poorly understood, impeding the construction of robust risk models for agriculture. Previous studies of crop vulnerability to tephra are semi-quantitative and consider tephra accumulation as the only hazard intensity metric. Here, we provide a robust evaluation of crop vulnerability based on the analysis of 700 sets of quantitative data, allowing for the assessment of the influence of various volcanic and non-volcanic factors. We collected farmers’ perceptions of damage to fodders, root and tuber crops, leafy crops, legumes, cereals, tree fruits, non-tree fruits, and estimations of their yield loss due to the August 16–17, 2006, October–November, 2015, and February–March, 2016, eruptions of Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador. Crop yield loss increased with tephra loads (48 ± 35, 69 ± 33, and 76 ± 34% for < 0.5, 0.5–5, and 5–50 kg m−2, respectively), and we found that exposure to tephra led to a greater decline in yield compared to existing predictions. The results further highlight the plant phenological stage as a key factor of vulnerability. Exposure to tephra during the flowering period of legumes, cereals, and tree fruits caused a median yield loss ≥ 80%. Legumes, tree fruits, and non-tree fruits are more vulnerable to tephra than onions. Quantitative knowledge on crop vulnerability to tephra can be obtained from post-eruption impact assessments provided that a large population sample is collected and careful uncertainty analysis is conducted.

Abstract Image

厄瓜多尔通古拉瓦火山作物易受火山碎屑危害程度的定量评估:了解火山和生物因素的影响
农作物经常受到火山爆发产生的火山碎屑的影响,造成重大经济损失,危及当地乃至区域范围内农民的生计。人们对农作物易受火山碎屑影响的程度仍然知之甚少,这阻碍了建立健全的农业风险模型。以往对作物易受表土影响程度的研究都是半定量的,并将表土累积作为唯一的灾害强度指标。在此,我们根据对 700 组定量数据的分析,对作物的脆弱性进行了稳健的评估,从而可以评估各种火山和非火山因素的影响。我们收集了农民对 2006 年 8 月 16 日至 17 日、2015 年 10 月至 11 月以及 2016 年 2 月至 3 月厄瓜多尔通古拉瓦火山爆发对饲料、块根和块茎作物、叶类作物、豆类、谷物、木本水果、非木本水果造成的损害的看法,以及对其产量损失的估计。作物产量损失随着表土负荷的增加而增加(< 0.5、0.5-5 和 5-50 kg m-2 分别为 48 ± 35、69 ± 33 和 76 ± 34%),我们发现,与现有预测相比,表土暴露导致的产量下降幅度更大。研究结果进一步凸显了植物物候期是影响产量的关键因素。在豆科植物、谷物和林果的开花期暴露于热灰岩,造成的产量损失中位数≥ 80%。与洋葱相比,豆科植物、木本水果和非木本水果更容易受到表土的影响。只要收集大量人口样本并进行仔细的不确定性分析,就可以从火山爆发后的影响评估中获得作物易受火山碎屑影响的定量知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Volcanology
Bulletin of Volcanology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Volcanology was founded in 1922, as Bulletin Volcanologique, and is the official journal of the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI). The Bulletin of Volcanology publishes papers on volcanoes, their products, their eruptive behavior, and their hazards. Papers aimed at understanding the deeper structure of volcanoes, and the evolution of magmatic systems using geochemical, petrological, and geophysical techniques are also published. Material is published in four sections: Review Articles; Research Articles; Short Scientific Communications; and a Forum that provides for discussion of controversial issues and for comment and reply on previously published Articles and Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信