State‐of‐the‐practice in quality assurance in Java‐based open source software development

Ali Khatami, Andy Zaidman
{"title":"State‐of‐the‐practice in quality assurance in Java‐based open source software development","authors":"Ali Khatami, Andy Zaidman","doi":"10.1002/spe.3321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryTo ensure the quality of software systems, software engineers can make use of a variety of quality assurance approaches, for example, software testing, modern code review, automated static analysis, and build automation. Each of these quality assurance practices have been studied in depth in isolation, but there is a clear knowledge gap when it comes to our understanding of how these approaches are being used in conjunction, or not. In our study, we broadly investigate whether and how these quality assurance approaches are being used in conjunction in the development of 1454 popular open source software projects on GitHub. Our study indicates that typically projects do not follow all quality assurance practices together with high intensity. In fact, we only observe weak correlation among some quality assurance practices. In general, our study provides a deeper understanding of how existing quality assurance approaches are currently being used in Java‐based open source software development. Besides, we specifically zoom in on the more mature projects in our dataset, and generally we observe that more mature projects are more intense in their application of the quality assurance practices, with more focus on their ASAT usage, and code reviewing, but no strong change in their CI usage.","PeriodicalId":21899,"journal":{"name":"Software: Practice and Experience","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software: Practice and Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SummaryTo ensure the quality of software systems, software engineers can make use of a variety of quality assurance approaches, for example, software testing, modern code review, automated static analysis, and build automation. Each of these quality assurance practices have been studied in depth in isolation, but there is a clear knowledge gap when it comes to our understanding of how these approaches are being used in conjunction, or not. In our study, we broadly investigate whether and how these quality assurance approaches are being used in conjunction in the development of 1454 popular open source software projects on GitHub. Our study indicates that typically projects do not follow all quality assurance practices together with high intensity. In fact, we only observe weak correlation among some quality assurance practices. In general, our study provides a deeper understanding of how existing quality assurance approaches are currently being used in Java‐based open source software development. Besides, we specifically zoom in on the more mature projects in our dataset, and generally we observe that more mature projects are more intense in their application of the quality assurance practices, with more focus on their ASAT usage, and code reviewing, but no strong change in their CI usage.
基于 Java 的开源软件开发质量保证的实践现状
摘要为了确保软件系统的质量,软件工程师可以使用各种质量保证方法,例如软件测试、现代代码审查、自动静态分析和构建自动化。这些质量保证方法中的每一种都被单独进行了深入研究,但在了解这些方法是否被结合使用方面,我们还存在明显的知识差距。在我们的研究中,我们广泛调查了 GitHub 上 1454 个流行开源软件项目在开发过程中是否以及如何结合使用这些质量保证方法。我们的研究表明,通常情况下,项目并不会高强度地同时采用所有质量保证方法。事实上,我们只观察到某些质量保证实践之间存在微弱的相关性。总的来说,我们的研究让我们更深入地了解了现有的质量保证方法目前是如何用于基于 Java 的开源软件开发的。此外,我们还特别放大了数据集中较为成熟的项目,总体而言,我们观察到较为成熟的项目在质量保证实践的应用上更为密集,他们更注重 ASAT 的使用和代码审查,但在 CI 的使用上没有很大的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信