Proportionality during Times of Crisis: Precautionary Application of Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Review of Emergency Measures

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1017/s1574019624000051

Pavel Ondřejek, Filip Horák

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need for a standard of review even during times of crisis – proportionality analysis as the ideal and universally applicable standard of review – the problem of excessive stringency of proportionality analysis during an emergency – the principle of in dubio pro libertate as the cause of the problem – adjusting each component of proportionality analysis to the precautionary principle as the solution – the precautionary application of proportionality analysis strikes a more appropriate balance between excessive stringency and insufficient protection of fundamental rights

查看原文本刊更多论文

危机时期的相称性：紧急措施司法审查中相称性分析的预防性应用

即使在危机时期也需要有审查标准--相称性分析是理想的和普遍适用的审查标准--紧急状态下相称性分析过于严格的问题--"疑罪从无 "原则是问题的根源--根据预防原则调整相称性分析的各个组成部分是解决办法--相称性分析的预防性应用在过于严格和基本权利保护不足之间取得了更为适当的平衡

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.