Identification of Protein–Protein Interaction Associated Functions Based on Gene Ontology

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Yu-Hang Zhang, FeiMing Huang, JiaBo Li, WenFeng Shen, Lei Chen, KaiYan Feng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai
{"title":"Identification of Protein–Protein Interaction Associated Functions Based on Gene Ontology","authors":"Yu-Hang Zhang,&nbsp;FeiMing Huang,&nbsp;JiaBo Li,&nbsp;WenFeng Shen,&nbsp;Lei Chen,&nbsp;KaiYan Feng,&nbsp;Tao Huang,&nbsp;Yu-Dong Cai","doi":"10.1007/s10930-024-10180-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) involve the physical or functional contact between two or more proteins. Generally, proteins that can interact with each other always have special relationships. Some previous studies have reported that gene ontology (GO) terms are related to the determination of PPIs, suggesting the special patterns on the GO terms of proteins in PPIs. In this study, we explored the special GO term patterns on human PPIs, trying to uncover the underlying functional mechanism of PPIs. The experimental validated human PPIs were retrieved from STRING database, which were termed as positive samples. Additionally, we randomly paired proteins occurring in positive samples, yielding lots of negative samples. A simple calculation was conducted to count the number of positive samples for each GO term pair, where proteins in samples were annotated by GO terms in the pair individually. The similar number for negative samples was also counted and further adjusted due to the great gap between the numbers of positive and negative samples. The difference of the above two numbers and the relative ratio compared with the number on positive samples were calculated. This ratio provided a precise evaluation of the occurrence of GO term pairs for positive samples and negative samples, indicating the latent GO term patterns for PPIs. Our analysis unveiled several nuclear biological processes, including gene transcription, cell proliferation, and nutrient metabolism, as key biological functions. Interactions between major proliferative or metabolic GO terms consistently correspond with significantly reported PPIs in recent literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":793,"journal":{"name":"The Protein Journal","volume":"43 3","pages":"477 - 486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Protein Journal","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10930-024-10180-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) involve the physical or functional contact between two or more proteins. Generally, proteins that can interact with each other always have special relationships. Some previous studies have reported that gene ontology (GO) terms are related to the determination of PPIs, suggesting the special patterns on the GO terms of proteins in PPIs. In this study, we explored the special GO term patterns on human PPIs, trying to uncover the underlying functional mechanism of PPIs. The experimental validated human PPIs were retrieved from STRING database, which were termed as positive samples. Additionally, we randomly paired proteins occurring in positive samples, yielding lots of negative samples. A simple calculation was conducted to count the number of positive samples for each GO term pair, where proteins in samples were annotated by GO terms in the pair individually. The similar number for negative samples was also counted and further adjusted due to the great gap between the numbers of positive and negative samples. The difference of the above two numbers and the relative ratio compared with the number on positive samples were calculated. This ratio provided a precise evaluation of the occurrence of GO term pairs for positive samples and negative samples, indicating the latent GO term patterns for PPIs. Our analysis unveiled several nuclear biological processes, including gene transcription, cell proliferation, and nutrient metabolism, as key biological functions. Interactions between major proliferative or metabolic GO terms consistently correspond with significantly reported PPIs in recent literature.

Abstract Image

基于基因本体的蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用相关功能的鉴定。
蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)涉及两种或两种以上蛋白质之间的物理或功能接触。一般来说,能相互作用的蛋白质总是有特殊的关系。之前的一些研究报告指出,基因本体(GO)术语与 PPIs 的判定有关,提示了 PPIs 中蛋白质的 GO 术语的特殊模式。本研究探讨了人类 PPIs 的特殊 GO 术语模式,试图揭示 PPIs 的潜在功能机制。我们从 STRING 数据库中检索了经过实验验证的人类 PPIs,并将其称为阳性样本。此外,我们还将阳性样本中出现的蛋白质随机配对,产生了大量阴性样本。我们进行了简单的计算,统计了每对 GO 术语的阳性样本数量,其中样本中的蛋白质分别由这对术语中的 GO 术语注释。由于阳性样本和阴性样本的数量差距很大,因此也对阴性样本的类似数量进行了计算和进一步调整。计算上述两个数字的差值以及与阳性样本数字相比的相对比率。这一比率精确地评估了阳性样本和阴性样本中 GO 术语对的出现情况,显示了 PPIs 的潜在 GO 术语模式。我们的分析揭示了几个核生物过程,包括基因转录、细胞增殖和营养代谢,这些都是关键的生物功能。主要增殖或代谢 GO 术语之间的相互作用与近期文献中报道的 PPIs 一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Protein Journal
The Protein Journal 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Protein Journal (formerly the Journal of Protein Chemistry) publishes original research work on all aspects of proteins and peptides. These include studies concerned with covalent or three-dimensional structure determination (X-ray, NMR, cryoEM, EPR/ESR, optical methods, etc.), computational aspects of protein structure and function, protein folding and misfolding, assembly, genetics, evolution, proteomics, molecular biology, protein engineering, protein nanotechnology, protein purification and analysis and peptide synthesis, as well as the elucidation and interpretation of the molecular bases of biological activities of proteins and peptides. We accept original research papers, reviews, mini-reviews, hypotheses, opinion papers, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信