{"title":"Coherence-based channel selection and Riemannian geometry features for magnetoencephalography decoding","authors":"Chao Tang, Tianyi Gao, Gang Wang, Badong Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10085-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Magnetoencephalography (MEG) records the extremely weak magnetic fields on the surface of the scalp through highly sensitive sensors. Multi-channel MEG data provide higher spatial and temporal resolution when measuring brain activities, and can be applied for brain-computer interfaces as well. However, a large number of channels leads to high computational complexity and can potentially impact decoding accuracy. To improve the accuracy of MEG decoding, this paper proposes a new coherence-based channel selection method that effectively identifies task-relevant channels, reducing the presence of noisy and redundant information. Riemannian geometry is then used to extract effective features from selected channels of MEG data. Finally, MEG decoding is achieved by training a support vector machine classifier with the Radial Basis Function kernel. Experiments were conducted on two public MEG datasets to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results from Dataset 1 show that Riemannian geometry achieves higher classification accuracy (compared to common spatial patterns and power spectral density) in the single-subject visual decoding task. Moreover, coherence-based channel selection significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.0002) outperforms the use of all channels. Moving on to Dataset 2, the results reveal that coherence-based channel selection is also significantly (<i>P</i> <0.0001) superior to all channels and channels around C3 and C4 in cross-session mental imagery decoding tasks. Additionally, the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods in motor imagery tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10085-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) records the extremely weak magnetic fields on the surface of the scalp through highly sensitive sensors. Multi-channel MEG data provide higher spatial and temporal resolution when measuring brain activities, and can be applied for brain-computer interfaces as well. However, a large number of channels leads to high computational complexity and can potentially impact decoding accuracy. To improve the accuracy of MEG decoding, this paper proposes a new coherence-based channel selection method that effectively identifies task-relevant channels, reducing the presence of noisy and redundant information. Riemannian geometry is then used to extract effective features from selected channels of MEG data. Finally, MEG decoding is achieved by training a support vector machine classifier with the Radial Basis Function kernel. Experiments were conducted on two public MEG datasets to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results from Dataset 1 show that Riemannian geometry achieves higher classification accuracy (compared to common spatial patterns and power spectral density) in the single-subject visual decoding task. Moreover, coherence-based channel selection significantly (P = 0.0002) outperforms the use of all channels. Moving on to Dataset 2, the results reveal that coherence-based channel selection is also significantly (P <0.0001) superior to all channels and channels around C3 and C4 in cross-session mental imagery decoding tasks. Additionally, the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods in motor imagery tasks.
脑磁图(MEG)通过高灵敏度传感器记录头皮表面极其微弱的磁场。在测量大脑活动时,多通道 MEG 数据可提供更高的空间和时间分辨率,也可用于脑机接口。然而,大量信道会导致计算复杂度增高,并可能影响解码精度。为了提高 MEG 解码的准确性,本文提出了一种新的基于相干性的通道选择方法,该方法能有效识别与任务相关的通道,减少噪声和冗余信息的存在。然后,利用黎曼几何学从 MEG 数据的选定通道中提取有效特征。最后,通过训练具有径向基函数核的支持向量机分类器实现 MEG 解码。我们在两个公开的 MEG 数据集上进行了实验,以验证所提方法的有效性。数据集 1 的结果表明,在单主体视觉解码任务中,黎曼几何达到了更高的分类精度(与普通空间模式和功率谱密度相比)。此外,基于相干性的信道选择明显(P = 0.0002)优于使用所有信道。转到数据集 2,结果显示,在跨时段心理意象解码任务中,基于相干性的通道选择也明显(P <0.0001)优于所有通道以及 C3 和 C4 附近的通道。此外,在运动想象任务中,所提出的方法也优于最先进的方法。
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models.
The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome.
The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged.
1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics.
2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages.
3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.